It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VenusOnTheHalfShell
The studies on water molecules by Masaru Emoto show absolutely that concentrated thoughts on water affect its reality. Greg Braden lists many examples of scientific evidence accumulated lately that support the human mind and emotion affect outcomes.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
The spoon is a part of your body...
No it is not. But thanks for the review on the effects of positive thinking and mental conditioning mixed in with the insults.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
The guy claiming the "money trick" (his words) did not seem to be referring to mental conditioning and if he were, his "positive thinking visualizations" only amounted to correlating two unrelated events as I had already stated.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
The claimed power of belief or faith even by your own explanation still has no tangible effect on the actions of the external world and serves only to make a self-conceived correlation more plausible.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Also, spoons are not part of anyone's body, nor can they be bent using simply the power of the mind. And you know what I was referring to since I referenced Uri Geller and there was no need to make the point that your mind has to affect your hand and fingers to actually bend one. I'm uncertain what the point of that statement even was.
Originally posted by warpcrafter
I personally believe that it should be taken a step farther. Research psi potential until a method has been discovered to awaken its full potential in everyone, without living as a monk for 50 years first. If we were all so empowered, the people behind the scenes would be powerless.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
I didn't insult anyone.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by djbj597922
Show me some scientific fact that says the observer doesn't change things. Because I can show you the double slit experiment that proves it does.
There are all kinds of experiments that display and reveal the mysteries of quantum mechanics and I'm not here to debunk them. I will however demand citations and proofs from those who exploit such mysteries to validate their mystical claims and beliefs. Perhaps you were confused about my posts.
Originally posted by OnceReturned
reply to post by ALLis0NE
In response to your story:
This is the kind of thing that I have a problem with when people set out to "prove" their powers, or whatever you would like to call them. All the evidence is anecdotal. None of this stuff can be proven in under controlled experimental conditions.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by constantwonder
Perhaps all of you who like to throw around the "observer effect" and the double slit experiment should take a moment to learn what is actually meant by observer. The human mind isn't some magical "observer" and it is certainly not the only "observer"
Originally posted by OnceReturned
reply to post by ALLis0NE
In response to your story:
This is the kind of thing that I have a problem with when people set out to "prove" their powers, or whatever you would like to call them. All the evidence is anecdotal. None of this stuff can be proven in under controlled experimental conditions.
Originally posted by OnceReturned
What about all the times you wished for something and it didn't come true? Hasn't that happened way more than instances like this meal story? Of course it has, it's just that you remember the meal story because it is in agreement with your belief system, and you forget all the times your powers fail you because those instances disagree with you belief system. This is called confirmation bias. If the effect was real, it would work every time. Real things that are actually true are consistantly true.
Originally posted by OnceReturned
What about physics? What about the way that science has explained the world so successfully? Every experiment ever done supports in a general way the scientific world view; that reality is a process of cause and effect and the effects are linked to the causes by physical processes. What you are suggesting is that reality actually works in an entirely different way, and the evidence that you are offering is this story and others like it. That does not stack up against the mountains of evidence supporting the picture of the world painted by the conventional physical sciences.
Originally posted by OnceReturned
How do you propose that your thoughts effected the cook at the restraunt? What actually caused him to make the wrong meal? There has to be some chain of causaly related physical properties that actually led to him putting the wrong ingredients in the oven. How did your thoughts make it out of your head and into his?
...Imagine if the entire world knew the power it held?
It would be a massacre.
Everyone does not have the same mindset as you do, or I do.
Imagine if murderers, thieves, rapists knew how to change the world around them.
What would the rest of us be? Superheroes?
We must be careful who we let in on these "secrets." Otherwise, they will fall into the wrong hands.