It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Unfortunately, there is a large contigent of individuals who prefer to start with a premise, then only selectively choose anything that can be found, in "research", to support that supposition. Whilst ignoring, or discounting, any other evidence that refutes the contention.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
What is necessary here is to point out obvious flaws. NOT that the person who posts them is responsible for the flaws in the first place; rather, that person has likely been duped, led down a wrong path, by poor information.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
This is not an argument. I offer additional research venues for you to consider. IF a person is truly interested in proper research.
Unfortunately, there is a large contigent of individuals who prefer to start with a premise, then only selectively choose anything that can be found, in "research", to support that supposition. Whilst ignoring, or discounting, any other evidence that refutes the contention.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
I suggest we put these people on ignore, and collaborate to make a bunch of new posts, putting them on the defensive. These guys aren't worth a single breath of air or time. Seriously. Why are you wasting your time responding to them and letting them make you dance to their tune?
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Unfortunately, there is a large contigent of individuals who prefer to start with a premise, then only selectively choose anything that can be found, in "research", to support that supposition. Whilst ignoring, or discounting, any other evidence that refutes the contention.
Ironically it seems that you have started with the premise that the official story is true and view everything from that conclusion.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
What is necessary here is to point out obvious flaws. NOT that the person who posts them is responsible for the flaws in the first place; rather, that person has likely been duped, led down a wrong path, by poor information.
Sometimes it is hard to believe that person could have some much information available but still come to a conclusion that contradicts the evidence.
Originally posted by Jezus
Sometimes it is hard to believe that person could have some much information available but still come to a conclusion that contradicts the evidence.