The new paradigm by which archeology and biology base their assumptions is that planet earth settled from it's chaotic birth much faster than earlier
thought. Shown by research:
Scientists have been able to reconstruct detailed information about the planet's past. The earliest dated Solar System material is dated to
4.5672 ± 0.0006 billion years ago,[16] and by 4.54 billion years ago (within an uncertainty of 1%)[12] the Earth and the other planets in the Solar
System formed out of the solar nebula—a disk-shaped mass of dust and gas left over from the formation of the Sun. This assembly of the Earth through
accretion was largely completed within 10–20 million years.[17] Initially molten, the outer layer of the planet Earth cooled to form a solid crust
when water began accumulating in the atmosphere. The Moon formed shortly thereafter, 4.53 billion years ago.[18]
Full Page
So. The moon was forming at 4.53 billion years ago. Tidal activity began almost immediately, forming sedimentation as well as amassing large
quantities of various minerals and nutrients in certain regions. A perfect set up for bacterial life that was brought in initially through the impact
between Terra and
Theia.
If the new information about panspermiatic origins proves accurate, and many major players in the science community are openly discussing and
endorsing this idea, which is saying a lot considering science's inherent skepticism; than we are looking at a shift of view. A shift from the idea
that bacterial life took a billion + years to reach even its infancy, to the idea that bacterial life arrived fully formed. Merely adapting to our
environment and progressing along evolutionary pathways. If this IS the case, and I'm not saying it is, than our whole timeline needs to be
redrawn.
The dinosaurs were around for millions of years, we've been around for a hundred thousand give or take another hundred thousand years, at least
according to current anthropological opinions. And even before the dinosaurs, how much time was there for other types of life, perhaps mammals rose
first and died off making way for the dino's. All I'm saying is, look what we accomplished in such a short span of time. Don't rule out the
possibility that we are 'unique' in our intellectual capacity for reason, understanding, and culture. I cannot fathom a world where the ONLY life
was trilobites for a couple of eons. There was definitely continental life, since i doubt plants crawled from the ocean.
In my humble opinion, its foolish to believe we jumped from blue-green algae to dinosaurs without other life leading TO the dinosaurs. Nothing comes
from nowhere. That being said, it would also be arrogant to assume that this life would be anything like us. The earth may as well have been an
alien world to what it is today, life would have been different, and as such it would not exist now, precisely for the same reason. Anything is
possible when you realize that 1/2 the last 4.3 billion years, the earth really wasn't sitting there bubbling away and cooling, and that this process
ended much much much much MUCH earlier.
However back to the topic at hand, human civilizations rise and fall. Always have, always will. To think otherwise is to be unprepared for change.
No doubt that about 10 000 years ago something knocked civilization off it's axis. We forgot our bond to nature, we forgot our languages. The
earliest civilizations in Egypt, Sumer, and South America (Peru, Nazca etc.), carried immense knowledge that was 'preserved' and not learned. The
Egyptians for instance emerged as a full fledged civilization, rather baffling to most archeologists. Perhaps because we are looking at it the wrong
way, maybe they weren't building, maybe they were
re-building.
Food for thought!
Cheers