It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Shanksville forest damage conflicts with official story?

page: 9
12
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2010 @ 02:07 PM
link   
How many times do I have to ask you guys to

stop derailing this thread?



posted on Mar, 21 2010 @ 12:19 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 02:21 AM
link   
Thought,

Why was there more fire damage to the forest than the crater and grassy field surrounding the crater?



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 07:02 AM
link   




Without refering to any "staged" event, can you possibly speculate on why the fire from the fuel explosion would assume the pattern that you percieve that it did?



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 07:25 AM
link   




Possible shoot down patteren.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 07:35 AM
link   




OK, possibly the plane was shot down. So how would that affect the burn patterns at the impact site?



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 07:38 AM
link   




Well could make more of a spread pattern instead of a local patern.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 07:48 AM
link   




Fine. How so? Because the plane was in mulitple pieces before it hit the ground maybe?



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 07:52 AM
link   




No, could be because fuel was leaking out from holes in the airframe.

But we do not knww for sure since we do not have all the facts and reports.



[edit on 12-4-2010 by REMISNE]



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 07:57 AM
link   




Besides a shoot down, can you think of any other reason that fire would assume one pattern and not another? I don't think we need to see the FBI crime scene reports to think about this. Don't even know that they could tell you anyway.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:05 AM
link   




Sorry but i do not go on theories or what i have been told i go by facts and evidence.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:11 AM
link   




Fine, then work with what you got. Look at the photos that have been released. All of them, organize a theory that would explain all the information you have and then create a test of that theory. Don't just sit and yearn for what you don't have.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   




Well i would if most of the photos were proper photos with proper sources.

Funny how i can post photos with sources but others cannot.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   




Well i would if most of the photos were proper photos with proper sources.

Funny how i can post photos with sources but others cannot.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:22 AM
link   




What about the photos from the Mossaoui trial or are they not sourced "properly" enough for you? I mean submitted and stipulated as to by all parties in a US Federal Court of Law. Please post just one thing that you percieved to be properly sourced and explain.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:37 AM
link   




Well i have not seen the sources for the photos at the trial. That trail was for a person and not the official story.

Here is an example of a photo with proper sources.


www.fema.gov...

Location: Arlington, Virginia
Photographer: Jocelyn Augustino
Photo Date: 09/15/2001 ID: 4600
Original filename: va_pentagon_0901_321.jpg » Download original photo
Size: 1,356.9 KB Dimensions: 2000x1312
Disasters: Virginia Terrorist Attack (DR-1392)

Categories: Terrorism



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:43 AM
link   




Per your standard, please state and show for the record how this is properly sourced? How have you affirmatively eliminated the agenda possibility?

And we have been over this before. The official story is what was to be tried or tested, not the person. That's how the judicial system works in this country. We don't "try" persons, we try the evidence against or for them.



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:49 AM
link   
I still have seen no photos of the excavation of the plane. I guess they decided to stop taking photos? It does not use much bandwith to post a link to one, Mr. OS?



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 08:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
And we have been over this before. The official story is what was to be tried or tested, not the person. That's how the judicial system works in this country. We don't "try" persons, we try the evidence against or for them.


Sorry but the trial DID NOT have reports from the 9/11 commission report other agencies or from the major media.

Aslo the trial was for a person not the OS.



[edit on 12-4-2010 by REMISNE]



posted on Apr, 12 2010 @ 09:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by earthdude
I still have seen no photos of the excavation of the plane. I guess they decided to stop taking photos? It does not use much bandwith to post a link to one, Mr. OS?


Actually, I have seen at least one, I think it may have been on the EPA website. I'll see if I can find it again.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join