Pentagon + Global Hawk = 911 attack

Originally posted by weedwhacker
The information you seek is THERE, but removed from public viewing....BECAUSE of the nature of the criminal investigation!!!!

Funny though how they could have everything else but the part and serial numbers in the report.

get hired and go to work for the Government, and get assigned to this case....THEN (unlikely, but just maybe) you will have access to this info.

I already work for the government. I have access to a lot more then most people on here.

Originally posted by ImAPepper
Isn't that the handbook for ACCIDENT investigations? Roger, do you think the plane crashes on 9/11 were accidents?

The crashes on 9/11 were not accident but the NTSB is still going to use the protocols from the handbook as it still covers aircraft crashes.

The FBI will be the ones who have to change over the criminal investigation team.

reply to post by REMISNE

Funny though how they could have everything else but the part and serial numbers in the report.

It is there - just not for your to see!

You are not special.

You are not the measure of all things.

You are not the definition of reality.

Originally posted by hooper
It is there - just not for your to see!

If they posted everything else they posted there is no reason they cannot post the part and serial numbers.

There is also no reason why they will not release the information through FOIA request.



[edit on 22-2-2010 by REMISNE]

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by thedman

They have

Problem is none really showed anything of interest, some captured the
smoke cloud from the impact. Most were aimed in direction away from the Pentagon and didn't capture any useful images.

Then why were they confiscated?

Why were certain cameras removed?

.................

And why are they not open to inspection by others yet?
I simply cannot believe that NO ONE, or any of the many fixed cameras around failed to capture the 757 - incredible!!

I really DON'T want to believe that a government would be capable of perpetrating such an act on it's own people, but too many things about 911 just don't add up.

I'm from the UK and feel for you guys over this, I just hope we're wrong and they were not involved, but I have my doubts....







[edit on 22-2-2010 by anomoly2]

Originally posted by REMISNE
I already work for the government. I have access to a lot more then most people on here.

Then why don't you share some of that information with us?

Since you seem to know more than we do please enlighten us.

Originally posted by COOL HAND

Then why don't you share some of that information with us?

Well the problem is that if i do that i will get a lot of complants because others will not be able to access the information to verify it.

I have already done it before and was attacked and insulted.

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well the problem is that if i do that i will get a lot of complants because others will not be able to access the information to verify it.

I am sure that someone else here has access to the same stuff that you do and could verify your claims.

Unless the stuff is specifically classified there is no reason why you could not upload and we can make our own conclussions.

I have already done it before and was attacked and insulted.

Join the club. Credibility around here is not highly regarded.

reply to post by COOL HAND

Credibility around here is not highly regarded.

AMEN to that!!!!

I CAN attest!!!!

(and I'm not a religious person, at all....hum......)

Originally posted by COOL HAND
I am sure that someone else here has access to the same stuff that you do and could verify your claims.

Unless the stuff is specifically classified there is no reason why you could not upload and we can make our own conclussions.

I have access to government sites on a secure intranet.

reply to post by REMISNE

I have access to government sites on a secure intranet.

So tell us, how much does the Officers Mess at Davis-Monthan spend on french fries each year?

reply to post by rnaa

...how much does the Officers Mess ... spend on french fries ...

You meant to write "freedom fries", right???

or, is that nonsense over by now???

Originally posted by weedwhacker

Tell me something. How can you believe the official story when it states things like the EPA blaming radiation at the Pentagon is Depleted Uranium from the plane?

Even though you and i both know the 757 does not cary DU.

reply to post by REMISNE

Tell me something. How can you believe the official story when it states things like the EPA blaming radiation at the Pentagon is Depleted Uranium from the plane?

Please tell us which of your bodily orifices you pulled that one from.

Originally posted by rnaa
Please tell us which of your bodily orifices you pulled that one from.

Its called research, you should try it sometime.

www.mindfully.org...
The EPA has verified that depleted uranium was in the plane that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 and that the crash site was contaminated.

[edit on 27-2-2010 by REMISNE]

reply to post by REMISNE

Its called research, you should try it sometime.

You need to provide your source when you make assertions like this. I shouldn't have to do research to find your source. If you can't provide a source, then you are just pulling it out of your butt and you know it. It isn't that hard to post a link.

It gets really boring calling people out on this.

The link you finally posted leads to a story by Leuren Moret that isn't about 9/11 or the Pentagon. The Pentagon crash is mentioned in passing, and the claim that the EPA confirmed DU on the plane is backed up with reference to two articles: one is surprise, surprise, another article by the same author and the other is in German. Neither is available on the net for further review. There is no reference to any EPA source, no press release, no testimony, no documentation. In other words, the author just pulled the claim out of her butt. (Moret is an anti-DU campaigner, which is just fine by me, but she has made some glaring errors in her campaign, and this one does not add to her credibility)

Furthermore, I did do my own research on this while I was waiting for your link. I found no evidence what-so-ever, none, zilch, nada, that there has ever been any 'official' claim or confirmation that unusual radiation, whether from Depleted Uranium or any other source, was detected at the crash site at the Pentagon on 9/11.

If you can find any such evidence, then please enlighten us. But remember, you said it was part of the 'Official Story', so you need to provide evidence that it is part of the 'Official Story', that is, the info needs to come from official sources.

Edit: grammar

[edit on 27/2/2010 by rnaa]

Originally posted by rnaa
Furthermore, I did do my own research on this while I was waiting for your link. I found no evidence what-so-ever, none, zilch, nada, that there has ever been any 'official' claim or confirmation that unusual radiation, whether from Depleted Uranium or any other source, was detected at the crash site at the Pentagon on 9/11.

Your research is either no good or you are afraid to do real research.

www.atlanticfreepress.com... -illegal-use-of-canadian-uranium-in-du-weapons-in-non-compliance-with-canadian-law.html
DU & 9/11

Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001. Two days after 9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) confirmed that the crash site rubble was radioactive and that it was probably Depleted Uranium (DU) contaminating the Pentagon crash site rubble.

[edit on 28-2-2010 by REMISNE]

reply to post by REMISNE

Your research is either no good or you are afraid to do real research.

You apparently don't understand English very well. You are claiming that radiation was detected at the Pentagon, and that the EPA confirms that it was DU.

You have given several links to assertions by Leuren Moret, but no evidence to support those assertions. I acknowledge Moret is making those claims, and that you are just parroting her ideas, you don't have to convince me that she is doing that.

As I said before:

But remember, you said it was part of the 'Official Story', so you need to provide evidence that it is part of the 'Official Story', that is, the info needs to come from official sources.

Moret's assertions are NOT official sources.

Please provide official sources for your assertions or acknowledge that it isn't part of the 'official story' you are so desperate to disprove.



[edit on 28/2/2010 by rnaa]

Originally posted by rnaa
You are claiming that radiation was detected at the Pentagon, and that the EPA confirms that it was DU.

Yes, and i can keep posting sites that state this.

Either the EPA were lying about the radiation being from the plane that hit the Pentagon or something other then a 757 hit the Pentagon.

www.americanfreepress.net...
Bill Bellinger, then head of the EPA’s Radiation Program for Region III, which includes Virginia, told AFP that he had received information of elevated radiation levels and contacted EPA officials at the Pentagon.

“I was concerned about that,” Bellinger said. “I didn’t disregard it at all.”

Bellinger told AFP that he thought the radiation was from DU in the aircraft.

This to me is dead on the nail! it should be sent strait away to the lawyer's who are handling this case against these Ba$^+%s!