It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Absolute proof: A Pentagon picture montage from start to finish

page: 104
250
<< 101  102  103    105  106  107 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:04 PM
link   
NEIT 018 - Describes searching for body parts, airplane fragments and removing debris from the Pentagon, 17-24 September.

NEIT 032 - Saw the plane before it crashed into the Pentagon. Describes his platoon's duties of guarding the interior hallways of the Pentagon and removing debris, including airplane parts, from the building.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by 911files
 


How is this evidence?

We're talking about a picture montage on this thread. I can type up something just as compelling, maybe toss in a few Mom and Apple Pie references, print it, scan it and post it as evidence.

What else you got?
edit on 23-3-2011 by Yankee451 because: TYPO

edit on 23-3-2011 by Yankee451 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by 911files
 



I guess it was a United Airlines or whatever.


See this is how witnesses fill in holes, things that they actually didn't see but guess they did after the fact when more information comes out, true or false.

None mention what is being discussed though. Nothing either says proves a Boeing crashed into the pentagon.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
NEIT 209 - Mark Skipper, fireman at Pentagon helipad at the time of the attack. Saw the plane and suffered burns.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Reheat
Bear in mind that most of the wreckage was buried under the collapsed portion of the roof.


no pictures of that, that's for sure!! I wonder how all that wreckage went through and made the hole in the C-ring if most of it was collapsed in the E-ring...

oh maybe because the airplane had to crash into and collapse a minimum of EIGHT walls, not including any internal office walls, that's just counting open space.

E-ring outer = 1 (pictures available)
E-ring inner = 2
D-ring outer = 3
D-ring inner security wall = 4
D-ring inner security wall to C-ring walkway = 5
D-to-C breezeway wall = 6
C-ring outer = 7
C-ring inner = 8 (pictures available)

I wish you would stop lying and making things up as you go, you're just wasting our time.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by 911files
 


"saw the plane and suffered burns"

Here's a good example of possible propaganda. Why mention he suffered burns, how is that relevant other than going for the emotional impact?



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:29 PM
link   
NEIT 299 - Sean Boger working in helipad tower. Saw plane approach and crash into building.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by 911files
 


Please address the observation that there were likely a sizable amount of intelligence operatives in the ONI, not to mention the Pentagon in general. In this light, is what you offer as evidence simply more obfuscation to confuse and distract readers from the real intent of this thread; namely photographic evidence?



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by 911files
NEIT 299 - Sean Boger working in helipad tower. Saw plane approach and crash into building.


or you could go by one of his other statements recorded in the Center for Military History and know that he saw the plane coming (North of the CITGO) and dove for cover, hearing an explosion...



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thermo Klein

Originally posted by Reheat
Bear in mind that most of the wreckage was buried under the collapsed portion of the roof.


no pictures of that, that's for sure!! I wonder how all that wreckage went through and made the hole in the C-ring if most of it was collapsed in the E-ring...

oh maybe because the airplane had to crash into and collapse a minimum of EIGHT walls, not including any internal office walls, that's just counting open space.

E-ring outer = 1 (pictures available)
E-ring inner = 2
D-ring outer = 3
D-ring inner security wall = 4
D-ring inner security wall to C-ring walkway = 5
D-to-C breezeway wall = 6
C-ring outer = 7
C-ring inner = 8 (pictures available)

I wish you would stop lying and making things up as you go, you're just wasting our time.


Good Lord, you still don't know the construction of the first and second floor of the building. Get a clue, will yea. I DID NOT in any way shape or form indicate that ALL of the wreckage stopped short of the C-Ring wall. You'll pretend that I did just as you have done previously.

Since the first and second floors were open office space where were all of those walls again. You'd better study the construction of those two floors more closely as opposed to the floors above prior to weaseling out of your distorted misconception.


Floor Space Between Facade and C-Ring is Mostly Unobstructed On the first and second floors, the Pentagon has continuous interior space extending from the facade to the inner-facing wall of the C-Ring, joining the C-, D-, and E-Rings. This is because the light wells between the C- and D-Rings and between the D- and E-Rings only descend to the bottom of the third floor. The only structural elements interrupting this space are columns apparently spaced on 10-foot centers along the direction perpendicular to the facade, with each first-floor column having a square cross-section measuring 21 inches on a side.


Where were those multiple holes again?



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thermo Klein

Originally posted by 911files
NEIT 299 - Sean Boger working in helipad tower. Saw plane approach and crash into building.


or you could go by one of his other statements recorded in the Center for Military History and know that he saw the plane coming (North of the CITGO) and dove for cover, hearing an explosion...


Not paying attention. That is his Center for Military History statement, "I am watching the plane go all the way into the building".

FYI ... I am the one who invested 2 years working with the Center for Military History to get them released and into the public domain. Some of us actually do real research.

NEIT 489 – Helped with rescue efforts. Describes debris outside C-ring ‘punch-out’ hole.
edit on 23-3-2011 by 911files because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thermo Klein

Originally posted by 911files
NEIT 299 - Sean Boger working in helipad tower. Saw plane approach and crash into building.


or you could go by one of his other statements recorded in the Center for Military History and know that he saw the plane coming (North of the CITGO) and dove for cover, hearing an explosion...


Good grief, you're gullible enough to swallow Craig Ranke's crap? No wonder you're eaten up with conspiracy. You are referring to one of the most toxic and discredited cult just short of Judy Wood's Space Beams and Dustification. You've repeatedly shown you'll believe anything as long as it's conspiracy fantasy. It's no wonder you still don't understand the events even after over 9 years.
edit on 23-3-2011 by Reheat because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2011 by Reheat because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2011 by Reheat because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by 911files
NEIT 209 - Mark Skipper, fireman at Pentagon helipad at the time of the attack. Saw the plane and suffered burns.


All quotes from the replied-to BCR link, Mark Skipper, unless noted otherwise.

"and that's when we saw the plane, and (incident) hit then started to run away from the building"

"I just started to run. Heard the horrible crash behind me. Saw the next big orange glow (inaudible) on the ground."

[interviewer] "What does it look like to you as you go toward the building?"

"(inaudible) lots of airplane burning, some high trees, and glass flying..."

"My God, this is -- look at all this jet fuel around us."
"I've been on plenty of airplane crashes before, in the Marine Corps."

"I never even made entry into the building until (inaudible)."
end of interview quotations.


So here we have a guy who has been to "plenty of airplane crashes", sees "(inaudible) lots of airplane burning" and didn't even get "into the building until" (inaudible; mentioned on page 7 of 10)

Where did it all go???

Here's a guy we should be trusting, he was on the scene, has experience with airplane crashes and burning jet fuel, and says he sees lots of airplane debris... if so, why is all this being suppressed?

also, I know without a doubt that many OSers will challenge me on this, because you do on every other statement I make... why does it NOT bother you that this alleged airplane debris, which would have serial numbers, and all sorts of forensic evidence on it, NOT be made public? You ask for proof?... it's being withheld by your government.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Reheat

Floor Space Between Facade and C-Ring is Mostly Unobstructed On the first and second floors, the Pentagon has continuous interior space extending from the facade to the inner-facing wall of the C-Ring, joining the C-, D-, and E-Rings. This is because the light wells between the C- and D-Rings and between the D- and E-Rings only descend to the bottom of the third floor. The only structural elements interrupting this space are columns apparently spaced on 10-foot centers along the direction perpendicular to the facade, with each first-floor column having a square cross-section measuring 21 inches on a side.


Where were those multiple holes again?


Dude!! reheat, you just brought some actual evidence to the thread!!!!


I'm inclined to believe you but would like to see a link or source for this; please provide the source for your info.
Looks like I was wrong.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thermo Klein
why does it NOT bother you that this alleged airplane debris, which would have serial numbers, and all sorts of forensic evidence on it, NOT be made public? You ask for proof?... it's being withheld by your government.


What parts have serial numbers? All of them? What would you do with a serial number if you know it. Are serial numbers required for all aircraft crashes? Are they normally released to the public?

You don't believe the DNA, nor do you believe any of the other FACTUAL information from any Government Agency. Who are you trying to kid that you would believe serial numbers?

Quite frankly, I hope they are never release any more material than has not already been released. Why? ... just so they can be termed shills, OSers, liars or a number of other terms commonly used in your world, .
edit on 23-3-2011 by Reheat because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2011 by Reheat because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2011 by Reheat because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I'm inclined to believe you but would like to see a link or source for this; please provide the source for your info.
Looks like I was wrong.


You find it.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Reheat
You are referring to one of the most toxic and discredited cult just short of Judy Wood's Space Beams and Dustification. You've repeatedly shown you'll believe anything as long as it's conspiracy fantasy. It's no wonder you still don't understand the events even after over 9 years.


You can watch Sean Boger say it in his own words, while seeing his face during the interview...

I'd source it but your ludicrous and insulting attempt at discrediting a live interview doesn't give me any reason to do your work for you.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Reheat

Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I'm inclined to believe you but would like to see a link or source for this; please provide the source for your info.
Looks like I was wrong.


You find it.


It's actually not that difficult. Best way to do it is go to the link where you got the information, copy teh link.
then use this formula beginning with a "



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Thermo Klein
 


Humans and there lil mortal baseless theories, and untamed imaginatation.

The only reason why you all keep going on about this, is because you all think the wings are suppose to go through the cement and form some type of cartoon picture which shows the plane wings and the body itself to show on the pentagon wall, your thinking in your head that both wings are suppose to show up on both side of the pentagon ,the wings broke off entering the pentagon, stop thinking the wings are suppose to show ,or go through the wall.
Between the explosion, and the weight of the wing ,let alone speed, let alone the infrastructure of the pentagon and


WAIT THE HELL A MINUTE!!!!,your a believer not a DAMN debunker.

YEA,stay off our side,we dont want you!!

Wait Wait,so your saying immortal,that it was plane>REAALLY?

SAY ITS NOT SO!!

We are all doomed,the day when the immortal joined the side of

LOOK,im bringing the truth, it was a plane ,thats it ,i dont want to hear no more about it,we off this subject,lets go.

so your saying no portal wars.

nope

no alien gravitation used?

nope

no missle

nope

so can i ask one logical question mortal child of the mother of all knowing?

sure.

SO YOUR FREAKING TELLING US,THAT THE WINGS DIDNT EVEN MAKE A CENTIMETER OF DAMAGE,LET ALONE AN INCH...REALLY,BECAUSE IF YOUR TELLING ME THAT,THEN I HAVE LOST ALL RESPECT FOR YOU,AND I WILL CALL MY AGENT AT ONCE,REALLY!

a centimeter?

YEA!!

a centimeter or an inch.

BOTH IMMORTAL>INCH, HALF A INCH,HALF A METER,HALF A WORM,HALF OF AN ANT,HALF OF A

OKAY OKAY OKAY,i got your point.



edit on 23-3-2011 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2011 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2011 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thermo Klein

Originally posted by Reheat
You are referring to one of the most toxic and discredited cult just short of Judy Wood's Space Beams and Dustification. You've repeatedly shown you'll believe anything as long as it's conspiracy fantasy. It's no wonder you still don't understand the events even after over 9 years.


You can watch Sean Boger say it in his own words, while seeing his face during the interview...

I'd source it but your ludicrous and insulting attempt at discrediting a live interview doesn't give me any reason to do your work for you.


If you understood the topography of the area you'd understand why it's deceptive. Now, he said he saw the aircraft hit the building and then dove for cover. It's Ranke who says he dove first and didn't see anything.

Have you seen Ranke's raw videos of his interviews and know what was edited and what was not. He has been proven to have LIED repeatedly. CIT is a blatant FRAUD.



new topics

top topics



 
250
<< 101  102  103    105  106  107 >>

log in

join