Lingerie line for kids to be launched

Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by djvexd

 

It's too bad most people are not going to see this. I made no comment on the clothing line itself because what i saw linked wasn't bad. The link in the OP was pretty damn bad though. The whole 10 year old and stripper pole thing freaked me out.

This isn't the first time Hilton has mislead people though. His tactics have gotten him punched in the face a few times.

Agreed 100%

You know the old saying, "If you can't say something nice don't say anything at all"...Well, anything I say about Perez Hilton would probably get me banned.

It's a shame that so many people were mislead by a celebrity wannabee attention whore. However, that does not take away from the fact that these young girls are still dressing like this...

[edit on 4-2-2010 by mitman93]

reply to post by mitman93


to be honest , in many countries she´d loose her children cause of neglect of parenting.

And I thought kids' beauty pageants were wrong, but dressing kids in lengerie is downright despicable! What's with these parents? Can't they see that allowing their kids to dress in this crap is going to attract every sicko on the planet? As for Cyrus, the s.o.b. should be horsewhipped for encouraging this! Something has been missing from our neighbourhoods for some time now, and thats groups of kids playing hopscotch, kick the can, skipping, or any number of games that were once played outdoors by children who knew how to use their imaginations, and never had to rely on computers for entertainment. I remember my own kid sisters pushing their doll prams down the street, clomping and shuffling along in our mother's shoes, and sometimes wearing one of her old dresses, but they were playing, and not trying to make some sort of fashion statement. Kids seem to be growing up much too fast these days, and are missing out on a lot of life's simple pleasures in the process. Where did all the cowboys and indians go, and the slapping of a skipping rope on the sidewalk, accompanied by young voices singing rhymes that sad to say, have all but disappeared, along with Roy Rogers and Dale Evans, the Lone Ranger and Tonto, and all the soldiers and pirates. Boys and girls played together in those days, and now the twisted minds of school councillors and child psychiatrists try to find bad where there was nothing but innocence.
My apologies for getting a bit carried away, but kids do not need their own line of lengerie!

......anybody with a name like "NOAH" , should know better than to

advance the cause of the satanic cult called .... "the family"


................. looks like things are now WORSE than pre-flood times !


HOLDFAST ...... X

This sickens me. the parents should be prosecuted. No doubt this will only enlarge the queue of perverted minds on this sad planet.

reply to post by Zosynspiracy


No, I see skull and cross bones as a statement that we are all here for a purpose and have limited time on this plane of existence.

It is a sign of mans physical mortality.

That is what the meaning in the middle ages was.

It's not satanic or evil.

Read Thanks for the Memories by Brice Taylor (free ebook)universe.jpl.nasa.gov/un010427.pdf

You will never look at butterflies and mickey mouse the same way again.

Like in "Alice In Wonderland", sometimes "Up is down and over there is really here".

reply to post by Crakeur


I enjoyed your post because you were actually there. Most of us can only speculate, but having someone with first hand experience / presence is insightful.

reply to post by telfyr

its not disturbing, it is a beginning of something way more than that.

Well spoken, and you are most correct.

reply to post by Dark Ghost


Most people have to have both parents working just in order to afford to put food on the table and a roof over their heads.

Housing alone costs a fortune.

Medical care? Not if you live in America and aren't full time. Medicine and doctors are another costly issue for most Americans.

No where in the world is the salary difference so exaggerated between the CEO and the "pions" then here in America and the majority of people just don't care enough to do anything about this injustice.

The person who pours your Mc coffee makes squat while the CEO's and "directors" that don't do diddlysquat make hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars a year.

Result: Millions of key latch kids unsupervised and left to fend for themselves.

It's a strong biological urge to "have a baby", "reproduce" but now days it's not a good idea if you're not pulling in some serious money so that one of you can stay at home and keep an eye on the kids.

When I was 8-18 I was watched like a hawk.

But, back then one salary could put a roof over your head and food in your belly.

Now, a cheap apartment where I am at one bedroom, small kitchen & livingroom, one bath is 700.00 a month base starting price.

I stayed at home with my three sons while they were growing up and babysat other people's kids to bring in some money. Worked from 5:00 am to 7 pm most nights at bare minimum wage.

There were tons of 9-10 year olds hanging around my house just for the adult company, some even offered to help just so they could hang around us...........so many key latch thrown away kids.

If you're thinking of "starting a family" do it right, do it when you have the time and money and can be with your kid.

Once they hit 10-17 that is the crucial time when they really need to be watched and be with.

So many kids are left to fend for themselves now days. sad.

Our children are our legacy, we are all interconnected.

If your neighbors kids are home alone and up to mischief, left to quandry life on their own or with the help of the media available this will affect you, your neighborhood and the rest of us.

I think why this thread has so many people's knickers in a bind is because we see the underlying problem and it's a major one, a whole generation not raised by parents but by the corporate media and that is scary.

[edit on 5-2-2010 by ofhumandescent]

I just want to trhow this into the mix... who says this benefits paedophiles at all? It all depends on what makes a paedophile...

If it is a genuine sexuality no different to heterosexuality, then yes this could perhaps excite paedophiles. But even then, to what extent? I don't particulalry find lingerie 'sexy', I find normal underwear much 'nicer' for lack of a better word.

And so if paedophilia is a genuine sexuality it still wont even excite all paedophiles. Some yes, but not all.

And if it's a genuine sexuality we should not be treating paedophiles as we do... if this is the case we should be keeping them away from children yes, but not in prisons, at least not in the way they are now.


Though most people across the world see it more as some form of sick fetish, and if it is a fetish I wouldn't see how lingerie would excite a paedophile at all. If its a fetish I would assume they would enjoy the innocence of the child...which lingerie completely removes and would therefore remove their lust for the child...

I find this idea rather sickening, and I wont deny that many paedophiles will be turned on by this, but monsters or not paedophiles ARE people, and should still not all be lumped into the same group. After all, guys that like lingerie don't all start abusing women who wear it do they?

[controversial..Yes But still, nobody else is going to say it]

I don't care whether these clothes are referred to as "lingerie" or not, the fact of the matter is I would NOT let my child dress like that. The super short skirts and lacy bolero jackets? Um, no, it makes your child look like a hooker. Just like those ridiculous pageants with the kids all dressed up in frilly bikinis and ten gallons of makeup plastered to their faces. It's just wrong! It's like putting a friggin sign on your child saying "HEY CREEPY GUY IN THE VAN, I'LL TAKE THAT FREE CANDY!"

I weep for little girls these days. I mean even their dolls are slutty. Look at those Bratz things! Sheesh! They even whored up Littlest Pet Shop toys. I used to love those!

One thing that I don't understand is why does everyone look at pedophiles as people who conform to one set of criteria. As if all pedophiles are psychological clones of each other.

Pedos don't do this, they do that!
As if what makes a pedo a pedo is written in stone.

It's NOT written in stone, nothing on this planet is written in stone, the only constant in this universe is change.

It's important to realize that while considering the impact of these images.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by LiquidMirage

 

So, it's a political issue now?

And it's all the liberals' fault?

Look, little girls have been wearing petticoats forever. That's all these are.

Tutus and Tiaras
Kaiya Eve
Pettiskirt Style

It's hard for me to understand the problem people have with this. But I guess I'll just let it go.

Enjoy your outrage.

ohh, besides the fact that they have them posing around a fkn STRIPPER POLE?? either your blind or you just dont give a shat.

so, a 9 year old, not only knowing what a dominatrix is, but actually wanting to emulate one, and then doing it? Nothing wrong there eh?

posing a group of young girls around a stripper pole, (yes, its a "stripper pole" ) or wait,, maybe its a "firemans pole"? with all the fire station scenery and outfits in scene, yeah?
nothing wrong with putting them around a stripper pole?

parents actually being stupid enough to be ok with this? nothing wrong with that eh?

whoever cant see that this is fukt..

WAKE UP!! THIS IS FUKT!!
Seriously. fkn retarded.


and you, enjoy your nap.

[edit on 5-2-2010 by Ahmose]

[edit on 5-2-2010 by Ahmose]

reply to post by Ahmose


I find it quite ironic that you find this immoral and innapropriate.. yet your post is riddled with insults and what is commonly considered to be highly offensive language; and therefore immoral behaviour. You're kind of.. "pulluting your own drinking water" to put it nicely. Maybe you could find a more civil way of expressing yourself?

btw. I do not agree with little girls posing with stripper poles either.

[edit on 5-2-2010 by riley]

reply to post by Vitchilo


Well now. Its pretty much the law that we read all posts in a thread... sorry but NO , theres no point. Im just going to say what I need to say , and get on with my day.
This , right here... is BULLCRAP! We ALREADY have an oversexed generation in the making, we do NOT need a new gaggle of image obsessed freaks roaming the world in too little clothing!
Just put the line in the sand down NOW before all hell breaks loose!

Originally posted by riley
reply to post by Ahmose

 

I find it quite ironic that you find this immoral and innapropriate.. yet your post is riddled with insults and what is commonly considered to be highly offensive language; and therefore immoral behaviour. You're kind of.. "pulluting your own drinking water" to put it nicely. Maybe you could find a more civil way of expressing yourself?

btw. I do not agree with little girls posing with stripper poles either.

[edit on 5-2-2010 by riley]

agreed, riley.
my apologies for getting out of hand there.
I am rather embarrassed for lashing out in such a way.. (kinda) lol
but I have just had it up to here ( indicates somewhere far above top of cranium), with all of the stupidity and ignorance everywhere, (by so called :"adults"),

I had a weak moment, and let my own ignorance seep through. I am sorry.

Originally posted by ModernAcademia
One thing that I don't understand is why does everyone look at pedophiles as people who conform to one set of criteria. As if all pedophiles are psychological clones of each other.

Pedos don't do this, they do that!
As if what makes a pedo a pedo is written in stone.

It's NOT written in stone, nothing on this planet is written in stone, the only constant in this universe is change.

It's important to realize that while considering the impact of these images.

Even the definition of a pedo is in constant flux! Is my friend that was dating a 15 year old when he was 17 a pedo. The court says he is, and that he can not be within 500 feet of her even though they are both of age and still in love?

In many cultures 15 is ok, or 16, or 17. In our culture it is entirely up to a prosecutor! A 17 year old may be legal today with his 15 year old girlfriend, but tomorrow they decide to try him as an adult? At the same time, in Mississippe a 16 year old can get married to a 50 year old even without parental consent?

I think we can all agree that 9 year olds should not be strutting around in sexy lingerie, but personally I don't see a problem with a tutu and stretch pants. I watch the Chipmunks cartoon with my young kids all the time and I think that showing the panties of the Chipettes while they gyrate and dance in their little skirts is a little odd and sickening, but I don't see anybody complaining about that?

reply to post by Ahmose


thankyou and no probs. I'm not always well behaved either.

Imo underage girls aren't allowed to work at strip joints so that pic in the OP really sends the wrong message. I vaguely remember there being a pole dancing toy set that got banned.. maybe I imagined it? I hope so.

Online game lets 5-year-old girls play prostitute

In addition, girls as young as five or younger – should they have the computer know-how – can immediately trade in online points to "purchase" for their avatar lingerie, nipple tassels, condoms and "antibaby" pills among other choice items on their way to the top of their own fashion empire.

My-Minx had already generated controversy last week – before revelation of the game's prostitution play – over a feature that allowed the avatars to adopt celebrity children, such as members of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's family.

At the time, parents groups in Great Britian, where the game is produced, expressed outrage:

"Having them getting virtual condoms or morning after pills will not make them any less promiscuous. As regards child adoption, this game encourages them to think that they don't need to worry about morals or ethics," spokesman Andy Hibberd of Parentkind told London's Daily Mail. "It is sending out all the wrong messages, and the only reason its creators have made it is to make money. They are exploiting children for profit. Children's innocence is very precious."

Disgraceful, but no doubt there will be those who'll say it's just a game.

www.wnd.com...

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I don't know what the big deal is... Is it the word "lingerie"? Because these are just frilly, ruffled dresses for little girls, perfectly acceptable in public. By the way, this company has been around for 5 years.

Ooh! La, La! Couture

It must be the word Lingerie that's got everyone's panties in a twist (excuse the pun).

I think the problem is little girls in sexually suggestive clothing. WTF is wrong with you? just clicking that link made me feel dirty. This is not funny. there are rapists/child molesters the world over that will have a field day with this. it will help to fuel their sickness, and somebody's child will be raped/killed because of it, albeit indirectly. I'm starting to understand while Miley has the rep she does in this town, if this is what billy ray lets his daughters get up to..

Edit: just saw the story is false. what's funny is how fast a story can travel, and get everyone riled up, only to have it be complete BS. Dunno if perez is behind it or not.

[edit on 5-2-2010 by dragonseeker]