It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Gun Grab Is On Schedule & Hillary Is On Board!

page: 1
9
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 04:15 PM
link   

The United Nations and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are moving forward with their plan to confiscate your guns.

The United States joined 152 other countries in support of the Arms Trade Treaty Resolution, which establishes the dates for the 2012 UN conference intended to attack American sovereignty by stripping Americans of the right to keep and bear arms.

Working groups of anti-gun countries will begin scripting language for the conference this year, creating a blueprint for other countries when they meet at the full conference. The stakes couldn’t be higher. Former United Nation’s ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners about the Arms Trade Treaty and says the UN “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there’s no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

Establishing the dates for the Arms Trade Treaty Conference is just the first step toward their plans for total gun confiscation. The worldwide gun control mob will ensure the passage of an egregious, anti-gun treaty… . . .and that’s where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton steps in. Once the UN Gun Ban is passed by the General Assembly of the United Nations it must be ratified by each nation, including the United States.

As an arch enemy of gun owners, Clinton has pledged to push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. She will push for passage of this outrageous treaty designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU. That’s why it’s vital you sign the special petition I’ve made up for your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty.” So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps. But looking at previous versions of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.

Don’t let any of the “experts” lull you to sleep by saying “Oh, we have it handled” or “Until you know exactly what’s in the treaty you can’t fight against it.” Judging by Ambassador Bolton’s comments — who certainly knows what to expect from the American-freedom-hating international crowd that infests the U.N. — we are certain the treaty’s going to address the private ownership of firearms.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate (which is where we must ultimately make our stand), the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE national governments to: *** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally; *** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course); *** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons; *** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.


Source

Admittedly, I don't know much about this website (NAGR)...But I do know if 10% of it is true....it's 10% too much.

It's happening right before our eyes folks.

You think they can do whatever they want now? Just wait until the guns are rounded up. You haven't seen anything yet.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 04:27 PM
link   
Obama was the cause of a huge rise in firearms sales. More and more people are seeing the US government as the mobsters they are. IF they ever do try and confiscate it will be a bloodbath.....but i highly doubt it would ever come to that....there's other craftier ways to render firearms obsolete.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 04:31 PM
link   
They can have the guns....

But they have to take the lead first.

Come get it



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 04:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Romans 10:9
but i highly doubt it would ever come to that....


That's wanted I've wanted to believe for years. But, I don't know anymore. They know we the people are not happy. TPTB must do everything possible to prevent an uprising. What better way to stifle it?

MSM is full, more than ever, of news stories about shootings. Conditioning.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 04:41 PM
link   
One word...

CLINTON.

Sorry for the short post, but we all know how fond the Clintons are of Gun Owners.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 04:54 PM
link   
COLD DEAD HANDS

Why do they not understand what the constitution is?



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:12 PM
link   
You need bullets to be able to use a gun. All the government has to do is clamp down and control the sale of ammo in the US. Although corrupt and tyrannical the people running our country are not stupid. They are cunning and crafty.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
You need bullets to be able to use a gun. All the government has to do is clamp down and control the sale of ammo in the US. Although corrupt and tyrannical the people running our country are not stupid. They are cunning and crafty.


Agreed. California has proposed legislation to register ammo.

However, I think TPTB are afraid there's already more than enough (way more) ammo in the public's hands....

So go after the identifiable problem...the guns.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Signals
 


I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to be the voice of reason. This is just more fear mongering. Does anyone know how the Obama administration was rated by the leading gun CONTROL lobby??

He received across the board F's for gun control from the most renowned advocates of tighter rules on gun ownership (Brady):

www.bradycampaign.org...

www.politico.com...


It seems to me that gun and ammo ownership is at an all-time high, largely thanks to the fear-mongering by conservative media outlets aligned with the NRA. That's just reality, right? Short of handing out military weapons to every household, I'm not sure else you want Obama to do.....

Best,
Skunknuts



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Lophe
 





Why do they not understand what the constitution is?

Oh they understand. Just the same as our forefathers did. You can believe
they know the enemy.That's how they're able to undermine it.

Who is going to be doing the confiscations?
The police?
The military?
Foreign troops?
All police and sheriffs dept.s could come together nation wide, via their
unions, and send a message to politicians across the globe. We will
support by force if necessary. The American citizens right to keep and
bare arms. As guaranteed by the constitution of these United States of
America, The same of which we are sworn to uphold.


SnF

[edit on 2-2-2010 by randyvs]



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:25 PM
link   
See, the world does end in 2012 just like they have been saying because it will take a freaking nuclear holocaust to disarm the citizens of the US.

And what is the UN's plan if the American people go completely bat guano crazy? I mean the US has a very considerable nuclear arsenal that is insignificantly guarded in a total pandemonium situation. I could see some countries finding themselves no longer remaining on a map at the hands of some very upset Bubba and Billy Ray's should it come right down to it.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


You think the police are in favor of increased laxity when it comes to restrictions on guns? Are you insane? They are on the front lines, and they are some of the staunchest advocates for reasonable gun control laws.

And what else did you just say? Foreign troops banding together to take Americans' guns???? Whaaaaa??!!

Best,
Skunknuts

[edit on 2/2/2010 by skunknuts]

[edit on 2/2/2010 by skunknuts]



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by skunknuts
 


Why Cops Do Not Support Gun Control

Does Gun Control Benefit LE?

Cops Vs. Gun Control

A Police Perspective on Gun Control

[edit on 2-2-2010 by thisguyrighthere]


The first article is written by one guy, who claims cash, not true beliefs regarding their own personal safety, is why police groups support gun laws.

The second article is more balanced, and I think worth reading. The comments, many by disparate police officers. should certainly be read. These guys are w/o agenda, mostly, and thus can be learned from....

Best,
Skunknuts



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:43 PM
link   


Are you insane?
reply to post by skunknuts
 

Well yes, but what does that have to do with anything? I realise all the points of your retort and more. I still said what I said .
What did I say again? I'm simply refering to what the police Should do,
as far as their sworn duty to defend the constitution and keeping themselves from being played like pawns to bare the brunt of what these spoiled punks are trying to do. I was hoping you would just get it.
With out all the extra writing.

Guess not!

You also need to understand the United Nations is involved so they can send in foreign troops if that's what is needed. k




[edit on 2-2-2010 by randyvs]

[edit on 2-2-2010 by randyvs]



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 05:49 PM
link   
You see, many of my neighbors and family will not have to worry about "Registered" ammo. November when Obama got elected, we went to the St. Louis gun show and I personally bought 1,750 .223 rounds for my AR-15. That crate wont be touched unless it is direly needed. its still in storage with plastic wrap over it.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 06:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Lophe
 



Why do they not understand what the constitution is?

Oh they understand. Just the same as our forefathers did. You can believe
they know the enemy.That's how they're able to undermine it.

Who is going to be doing the confiscations?
The police?
The military?
Foreign troops?
All police and sheriffs dept.s could come together nation wide, via their
unions, and send a message to politicians across the globe. We will
support by force if necessary. The American citizens right to keep and bare arms. As guaranteed by the constitution of these United States of America, The same of which we are sworn to uphold.


Isn't interesting how these lines come up again and again?

Lets see what those lines have anything to do with what I am going to say besides the outstanding patriotic happiness it brings.

We start with red..
Yes its granted under the constitution that We have the right to bare arms to keep a well regulated militia. and also to keep out government in line. so they say....

Now to white..
You people bring Jefferson, Adams, Jackson in here like its a big thing.. Actually they would be screaming at you today if they knew half the crap you let our government do today..

Off to Blue..
Ya its guaranteed Under the Constitution but that isnt stopping anyone from stripping people of thier rights.. There are a few that come to mind off hand..

Right to free speech, Ever hear of zones for so called free speech, Look it up.

Right to press, I really dont have to say anything about this now do I?

Right to peaceful assembly... Ya we see how this goes.. Check out RNC 04 (NYC) and DNC(Denver I think) last yr I think... And the popular G20 in pgh.

Unlawful search and seizure... Umm ya, if you have something out of place you are getting searched.

Thanks for playing How Patriotic am I? On the next episode we shall show how shredding the constitution leads to torture of people.

[edit on 2/2/2010 by ThichHeaded]



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 06:14 PM
link   
I don't think Hillary or any other group or person would dare try to seize the arms from US citizens, it would be a complete disaster and would result in the deaths of a lot of people, both government and civilian. The only way America will become gunless is by peaceful and logical disassociation



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 06:17 PM
link   
reply to post by ThichHeaded
 


Which is why the whole "constitution grants us" crap is just that.

It doesnt grant us anything. Our rights come from "god." They are self-evident. Requiring no document or government to acknowledge them or accept them.

It's people who keep referring to the gov or that goddamned piece of paper as some sort of cure-all panacea that will lead to total tyranny.

Too many people dont seem to get that. Gov and docs cant give us or grant us anything. They can only take things away.

A man doesnt ask for freedom. He doesnt beg anyone to tolerate him. (Which is my biggest peeve about this whole gay marriage nonsense.) A man simply has freedom. And if somebody should come by and try to take that freedom a man either stops him or goes and takes it back.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by skunknuts
reply to post by Signals
 


I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to be the voice of reason. This is just more fear mongering. Does anyone know how the Obama administration was rated by the leading gun CONTROL lobby??

He received across the board F's for gun control from the most renowned advocates of tighter rules on gun ownership (Brady):

www.bradycampaign.org...

www.politico.com...


It seems to me that gun and ammo ownership is at an all-time high, largely thanks to the fear-mongering by conservative media outlets aligned with the NRA. That's just reality, right? Short of handing out military weapons to every household, I'm not sure else you want Obama to do.....

Best,
Skunknuts


Thank you for contributing to this discussion. You can call it more fear mongering if you wish...I call it wake up America! We should be afraid....fear is motivation in this case. That's all we may have left to make people understand!

As far as B.O. receiving F's....that's called SPIN...he's getting F's because those groups would have had us disarmed already! The administration is acting too slow in their opinion!



new topics

top topics



 
9
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join