Norway Spiral : Case reopened - the anatomy of an event

reply to post by tauristercus


Why in all of the photos you have presented not a single one of them displays the obvious rocket trail that is hidden behind the mountains?

[edit on 2-2-2010 by Phlegmi]

Originally posted by Phlegmi
reply to post by tauristercus

 

Why in all of the photos you have presented not a single one of them displays the obvious rocket trail that is hidden behind the mountains?

[edit on 2-2-2010 by Phlegmi]

Hmmmm ... guess you missed this particular photo then ?
No mountain and an obvious rocket trail.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6c090b48b912.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by Helmkat

Don't get too excited. Many people are finding his mathematics to be quite incorrect.

reply to post by EvolvedMinistry

 

EM can you point out where the math is incorrect?

The "many people" you speak of don't seem to be on this thread and I am sure the OP would love the chance to correct his math.

Thanks in advance

Most definitively I'd be interested to see the results from these "many people" that are being mentioned and how they reached their conclusions that "his mathematics are quite incorrect".

reply to post by afterschoolfun


Pynchon is a brilliant writer in my opinion. possibly my favorite author of fiction!

great thread by the way, can you answer me this?

if this was a missile launch at what angle was it launched from?
at what height do you calculate the first sign of the ploom at?
was the missile launched from upright or at an angle? maybe
from a mobile launcher. the trajectory seems very shallow.

reply to post by PhotonEffect


I totally understand your point, but what if, say, hypothetically, David Wilcock made a claim that was actually 'true'? Should we then wait, and not mention that 'truth' until it is uttered by another source? How about things that are commonly accepted by most people as 'true'? Should we slightly disregard that, if the same assessment is shared by David Wilcock, or by somebody he is in support of? Has he been caught lying so much, that everything he says must by default be a lie?
I actually wouldn't know, because I don't know the guy, although I'd be the first to admit that some of the stuff he claims seems a bit out there, to be saintly about it. That still doesn't mean he's incapable of being an occasional exponent of 'truth'. Even if his agenda was to hypnotize you into buying all his books and then loose 'em and buy 'em all over again, ad infinitum, to make him the wealthiest person in the world, he would still be a potential candidate for telling the 'truth' every once in a while. Even when my rationality wants to commit suicide over the total madness and surrealism I'm hearing, I might actually be hearing the 'truth'. The 'truth' does not conform to our petty notions of it, just as little as the verbal formulation of laws of physics can change how physics work on a fundamental level. Where would modern physics be today, if all experimental results perceived as 'mindboggling' by the experimenters was simply swept under the rug at face value? We would have no quantum physics, to put it that way. Everybody is capable of stumbling upon the 'truth' every now and then, and who doesn't have an agenda these days anyways?

reply to post by tauristercus
Hi Tauris,
Brilliant stuff, I can really appreciate the amount of work in everything, from the theory to the presentation. The spirals themselves appear to shadow upon one another, and after the initial surprise I began to think it was a missile based on the shadows. I did not know where to go after that, although I thought it was a missile test, either not failed or most likely failed. There was one thing though, I did think that the missile system was originally a scratch one, but had to be modified, or at least the purpose-built subs had to be modified.

reply to post by pyrodin123321


That's real interesting! Like a mutant explanation. Half russian rocket, half science fiction wave noodlery, genetically spliced to form one überteori! I love it! Not even being sarcastic for the moment! But be warned, not all here believe in that moon conspiracy. I personally don't believe in the moon. It's clearly a fake, and a bad one at that.

WOW! Would you look at that! It's mindboggling!
What's even more mindboggling, is that all those years those poor science fiction special efx designers have been trying to create the perfect visual representation of alien spacecraft spacewarping their way into terran airspace, all they managed to come up with was the optical effect of a russian rocket malfunctioning? Says all about the creative 'talent' in hollywood, I guess.

[edit on 2-2-2010 by brageboogie]

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Not this again

Dont you get it was done by HARRP?


I cant believe your still believing the media side version of it.

Sorry even by your so called thread i still cant see this as a missile test.
why jumping the bandwagon with the media version?

[edit on 31-1-2010 by Agent_USA_Supporter]

HAARP is in Alaska! The blue trail does not originate in Alaska!

reply to post by tauristercus


How do you insert images into your posts like that? Is that some sort of privilege, or have I just encountered another indication that I'm technically retarded?

Originally posted by brageboogie
reply to post by tauristercus

 

How do you insert images into your posts like that? Is that some sort of privilege, or have I just encountered another indication that I'm technically retarded?

Special privileges ? I wish !

Very simple and straightforward ....

1. Go into your Picture Gallery area and upload a jpeg
2. Once it's uploaded and added, you should see it's thumbnail ... click on the image thumbnail
3. The image will shortly appear full size and you'll see 3 options below the image ... the one we want is the option "Embed on ATS"
4. Now highlight the entire [atsimg] entry and copy
5. Go back to your post and insert ... when you preview your post you will (hopefully) see the image.

Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
When I saw this was another thread on the Norway Spiral, I thought "oh no....here we go again!". But, as so many of you have pointed out, it's been one of the best researched and put together threads I've read on ATS!

Good job OP! It was definitively worth the time to read.

*this* is why I signed up and became a member of ATS!!

freestone wilson

reply to post by tauristercus


Thank you! so far, I have only posted some replies, didn't really know I had all that stuff! Will check out more thoroughly before the next time I exhibit my ignorance!

reply to post by brageboogie


brageboogie Please check your U2U inbox.

reply to post by brageboogie


Agreed thank you for the well thought out comment. Hit me up anytime. It seems we have a few things in common.

reply to post by EvolvedMinistry


glad you appreciated it!

reply to post by Jbird


thanks for the notice ; )

Excellent, don’t lesson to the” bandwagoneers “that talk about alien intervention or whatever they can come up with for their lonely life’s. You used mathematics to give your hypothesis a stable foundation. Bravo.. That is so much better that most on this site. I applaud you. Excellent!!!! Its amazing that some will beat into their heads that its aliens or HARPP and when the evidence is in their face still say “And you offer no evidence to refute.” What do you offer some crack pot idea that someone else put in your mind?? I mean just because Alex Jones says its real does not mean it is. Evidence is truth, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth!!!

Holy crap.

That is all.