It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by truthquest
But data released by the NTSB is not even close to being compatible with the damage path... it even lists the pilot cabin door as "closed" the entire flight.
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by Thermo Klein
4) That's been explained by dozens of scientists... use google.
Originally posted by ANOK
Locked cabin doors do not make buildings defy physics.
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by dereks
Locked cabin doors have NO relevance to the buildings collapses, which is the ultimate conspiracy, no?
[edit on 1/31/2010 by ANOK]
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by dereks
Locked cabin doors have NO relevance to the buildings collapses, which is the ultimate conspiracy, no?
[edit on 1/31/2010 by ANOK]
So why did your P4T pals bang on about them for so long and so embarrassingly?
This is a constant refrain here. Something is brought up, peddled as truth, then made to look foolish. At that point the ground is not conceded, but instead you jump back to some other trope of 9/11 lore.
I've lost count of the number of times someone has been made to look foolish about some facet of 9/11, only for them to splutter "What about Building 7 though????"
The fact is that most of you have a vague feeling that something isn't right, and you rely on an enormous supply of massed innuendo, most of which collapses when any proper scrutiny is placed on it. Only if you have a gigantic bias can much of this even be countenanced as evidence. Come at it with a vaguely open mind and it looks flimsy, pathetic even.
So if you want to stick to the core 9/11 issues, be my guest. But let's leave off all these tedious evidence-free sideshows.
Originally posted by Sean48
I'll keep it simple for ya trick.....
What the planes were doin at the time of impact, if they were serving fish or chicken , doesn't relate to the collapse of the building.
A little thought before posting saves these little lesson's.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by Sean48
I'll keep it simple for ya trick.....
What the planes were doin at the time of impact, if they were serving fish or chicken , doesn't relate to the collapse of the building.
A little thought before posting saves these little lesson's.
Then I repeat, why did P4T spend so long insisting that the door was of vital importance? It's almost as if they had some kind of preconceived bias...
Still a long way from that definitive "alternative narrative" of 9/11 aren't we?
Oh, and I'd go easy with chucking the patronising little bon mots around if I didn't know how to use a f**king apostrophe.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by Sean48
It is indeed relatively easy. ANOK wishes only to discuss the building collapses. That's entirely his prerogative. But that doesn't mean that others can't talk about the P4T closed cabin door nonsense, or indeed anything else the TM produces that is complete nonsense. There is no privilege given to particular areas of the TM narrative just because you happen to feel that they're more important.