It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Disclosure imminent? Look at these headlines from the past few days

page: 10
130
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 12:12 AM
link   
Here's a thought many will find very irritating (LOL) If 'Consciousness is Primary', to borrow from the title of a lecture I watched today (link below) then it would be entirely reasonable for signs of imminent disclosure to show up prior to disclosure itself in the form of a great increase in an awareness of the subject and desire for disclosure.

In short, if our consciousness is ready for and calling for disclosure and our consciousness is what determines if disclosure actually occurs, then expect an ever increasing number of threads at ATS about it and fever pitch focus on it, both here and increasingly in the media and academia, just before it occurs.


Just a thought.



1 of 7




[edit on 27-1-2010 by Malcram]



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 12:40 AM
link   
oh yes i have been noticing these. everyday there is more and more articles.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 02:15 AM
link   
I wonder if anything will be hinted at in Obama's State of the Union Address. The time slot on CNN is for 2 hours, but I looked up averages for these and it comes up to just less than an hour. Also, a "pre-discussion" of the State of the Union Address comes on an hour before. CNN will be talking about it one hour before and after Obama's speech? I never watched any of the Bush ones, so I'm hoping if somebody can fill me in. I know they like to talk about things for a ridiculous amount of time, but wow.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 02:15 AM
link   
Isn't disclosure in the hands of a black budget government that doesn't answer to anybody? The actual government isn't even in control of anything they know or do, right?



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 03:06 AM
link   
reply to post by franspeakfree
 


I agree whole heartedly, DO NOT TRUST WHAT THEY SAY. Use your own judgement and do not believe because you WANT to believe. They would not change their position 180 unless there is something to PROFIT from it.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 03:11 AM
link   
While I think it's important not to put any kind of hopes into something (we all know what happens 100% of the time so far
), it's also important never to have the mind frame "We're doomed, Disclosure will never happen.

Collective consciousness effects the outcome of things, the more positive you are about something the more effect it has for the better
.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 03:37 AM
link   
reply to post by SonicInfinity
 


Yeah, i'm pretty interested. Maybe he will hint on something..



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 03:40 AM
link   
How can anyone NOT know just logically, that we wouldn't be alone by now!

just because someone lives inland and has never seen a whale or dolphin, by now knows they aren't made up, even though they may have never seen one, OR a picutre of, one, just drawings...so what is the difference really??

it seems illiogical to me now. Just because the government put some shame thing on it....it would be the same if they put some shame stigma on whales and dolphins too wouldn't it??


Or if whales and dolphins conflicted with religions, they sure woulde put you through the ringer for seeing one!

If you really think about it...


[edit on 27-1-2010 by mellisamouse]

[edit on 27-1-2010 by mellisamouse]



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 03:55 AM
link   
reply to post by mellisamouse
 


Thats pretty terrible logic to be honest.
In a philosophical sense no they DONT know it exists until they actually experience it themself.

Have you seen a drawing of a unicorn, jersey devil, Spiderman? Or a photograph? So you know they exist right.

If you see a splash in the water, doesnt mean a whale did it. If you see lights in the sky, doesnt mean aliens did it. I have seen lights in the sky, difference between me and most people is I dont jump to conclusions... who knows whats piloting this light or if there even is a pilot!



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 03:59 AM
link   
Even if these headlines do not indicate the announcement of a "disclosure", they will however become the horse's bit. I believe that if such a statement regarding microbes were to be made. . .it's the desensitizing forebearer of disclosure. The film industry has given us many many speculative insights to the world of UFOs, which in turn sometimes makes the diehard sceptic ponder their existence. One day, when they just "show up", the people will all say "I knew it."

To give us little bits of information about how 'aliens' might be among us in the form of microbes, or that perhaps we are the aliens, is clearly a hint of a larger statement.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 04:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ridhya
reply to post by mellisamouse
 


Thats pretty terrible logic to be honest.
In a philosophical sense no they DONT know it exists until they actually experience it themself.

Have you seen a drawing of a unicorn, jersey devil, Spiderman? Or a photograph? So you know they exist right.

If you see a splash in the water, doesnt mean a whale did it. If you see lights in the sky, doesnt mean aliens did it. I have seen lights in the sky, difference between me and most people is I dont jump to conclusions... who knows whats piloting this light or if there even is a pilot!


yes but myself and probly millions of others, (most scared to admit it) HAVE seen craft, NOT just lights in the sky, CLOSE UP, and undeniable, and have also seen the beings, and nordic or whatever you wanna call them who occupy them.....just because we all don't walk around with video cameras every where we go dosen't mean they dont exsist!

I am getting a cell phone soon. I am making damn sure it has a camera plus video, so the next time I can hopefully get some pics at least.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 04:06 AM
link   
I have seen a relatively big amount of "space-life' articles in the Dutch papers as well.


interesting



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 04:18 AM
link   
reply to post by mellisamouse
 


See now thats being productive... if you want other people to believe you need evidence and clear evidence at that. Make sure you get one with a good zoom


And just saying, you saw Nordics? Thats what they call us, though the proper term is Norse
if I was driving that craft would you know the difference?



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 04:44 AM
link   
Many shall trust for it shall be on TV (if it isn't yet). Nobody shall deny the box with people inside. Nobody!



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 05:11 AM
link   
reply to post by DataWraith
 


I know exactly how you feel, everytime something like this happens, we believe that we are on the cusp of disclosure. However, after stepping away for a few months and looking at things differently, I can really sense that something is happening. Although I really want disclosure I am also apprehensive about Blue Beam.

If we think of how TPTB have acted with the banks for the last year or so, these people mean business and will never give up their power without intervention.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 06:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ridhya
reply to post by mellisamouse
 


See now thats being productive... if you want other people to believe you need evidence and clear evidence at that. Make sure you get one with a good zoom


And just saying, you saw Nordics? Thats what they call us, though the proper term is Norse
if I was driving that craft would you know the difference?


I probly wouldn't know the difference, but us being alone in alllll these universes seems silly to me.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 06:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unregistered
Many shall trust for it shall be on TV (if it isn't yet). Nobody shall deny the box with people inside. Nobody!


Apparently when i was little i used to panick all the time and tell my mom... "mommy! mommy!, i have to get in there and help all those little people!!!"



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 07:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Argyll



The Government IS NOT:
A shadowy group of nefarious monsters dedicated to messing with all we hold dear and laughing about it.


Are you sure about that?..........100% sure?

hmmm....Tony Blair....hmmm


A closing "argument" that belongs on the Daily Mail rather than on ATS and something that doesn't actually say anything. Way to be vague, bro!

Do you REALLY think Tony Blair isn't an obvious liar?!



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 07:21 AM
link   
OK, lets say there finally is so called 'disclosure'. What's in it for you and me?

Is that gonna get you a Ferrari? Or a free lifetime golf club membership? Or a free round-the-world cruise on a luxury liner? Or a free trip to the ISS aboard the Shuttle? Or even a trip around the Solar System on that alien spaceship?

So what's all the hullabaloo about? Why are we making such a noise about it? You'd probably be awestruck for a few days and then it'll be back to business as usual - going about your daily chores.

But the millions of pages on the web concerning 'imminent disclosure' and the excitement it is generating makes it look like the ETs are about to take us all to new exotic destinations around the galaxy!!

I'm not holding my breath.



posted on Jan, 27 2010 @ 07:29 AM
link   
reply to post by OrionHunterX
 


Well I for one think it would usher in a new era of human civilization. The conformation that we are not alone in the universe would have profound effects on the advancment of the scientific knowledge of our species and which directions research takes afterwards.

It would be philosophically and theologically revolutionary and again open up avenues which have not yet been explored (imagine studying an E.T. religion for example, fascinating!).

I think that the discovery/disclosure of that information would drastically alter society, the progress of our civilization and it's cultures and to think that it wouldn't, in my opinion, is a little naive.



new topics

top topics



 
130
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join