It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stereovoyaged
Originally posted by sparrowstail
reply to post by stereovoyaged
Can I ask a couple questions? My intent is not to offend. I for one understand the economics and culture of where you live. (I'm a spud)
What are the primary reasons (markets) the seals are killed now a days? How much of the animal is used? Just the pelt? Is there a lot of waste of the meat?
At what stage of the seals life span are they harvested? Is it just the young pups or any stage that is of value?
Just curious.
You have to understand that internationally speaking the seal hunt has a brutal image and support is dying out. Just saying
I completly acknowldge teh fact that they are killed for fur and killed as pups and that its a hard site to behold, don't get me wrong. With that being said, its no more inhumane than any other kiilling of animals. Its not just the pelts being used, I have eaten enough meals of seal to confirm that trust me. These people rely on this income to get through the year and support their family, its not pretty and glamorious but its a way of life. As long as there is a market for fur its gonna happen.
Originally posted by spinkyboo
So you are saying that people will starve if they don't "club" the baby seals?
You are saying that there is no other way for these people to live?
There are NO other options - and that before this practice countless people starved to death -
You are saying that "clubbing" is humane?
[edit on 20-1-2010 by spinkyboo]
Originally posted by The Baby Seal Club
I mean, do sharks and crocs sit around and worry about whether they're eating too many humans?
We are animals, they are animals, and it's called nature.
Originally posted by spinkyboo
reply to post by stereovoyaged
And how did people survive again before they started "clubbing" the baby seals? What did they do for income before that?
I never said it was more inhumane than killing a chicken or a cow.
Although I personally believe that the act of "clubbing" any living thing is seriously distrubing and more unnecessary than I could ever express.
It takes a "special" kind of person doesn't it - that can look any animal in the eye and then take a club to its head countless times if necessary -
or worse yet - know that it will just bleed to death in pain.
Now - do you personally think this is humane?
This was the question I asked -
I didn't ask if it was legal - being legal has nothing to do with it.
[edit on 20-1-2010 by spinkyboo]
Originally posted by solarstorm
reply to post by stereovoyaged
Well may karma ring the bell on your ass in the next life. You seem to be a real tough guy clubbing a defenseless creature that hobbles along trying to survive for "itself". As if there are a million other things to do to make a living and you act so proud to bring this kind of a thread to ATS. May God club you and your glorious "income".
Originally posted by stereovoyaged
I myself have no problem with it. And seeing as a club was probally one of the first tools man used, they probally didnt' do much before they "clubbed" things(see, if you ask a silly question you get a silly asnswer). What would you have them do, change their entire way of life because YOU dont like something they do?? This has been practiced as long as people lived on this island, so in a serious answer to your question we didnt' do anything before this, its all we know and there is no other option. In rural Newfoundland there is no wal mart to go work in, there is no jobs, the town i grew up in has one store. Closest "big" town is over an hour away and we don't go to the grocery store to pick up something for supper. Moose is a much more popular meat than beef in most cases. Again, you are critisizing a way of life you have no understanding of.
CANADIAN SEALERS TESTIMONY - OBTAINED UNDER THE ACCESS to INFORMATION LAWS:
CANADIAN SEALER: "Prior to March most females were killed with the pup inside them. I seen seven pups threw over the side after the female was pelted. I took two out myself. Me and another sealer even agreed that this was shocking and there should be another way to hunt seals. We were in the whelping on March 10/98 because I observed that eight of tens pans of ice had young pups with the after birth and other debris from the birth on the ice. There was once I can remember the young seal watching his parents being hoist aboard. He watched the boat as we steamed away. The pups were not killed but left by themselves on the ice." Sealer's statement, taken by Fergus Foley, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, June 10
-To Anyone who attempts to say that sealers Dont go into whelping grounds, this testimony proves that Sealers admit to it.
To Anyone who says they don't kill babies, this testimony shows that Sealers admit they do kill baby seals.
To Anyone who tries to quote the DFO sponsored "seal hunt is humane" study where DFO escorted observers went along on board sealers ships, can now be shown that study is a fraud, there's admission above that they passed weapons behind the backs of the DFO hired observers, and even the DFO-hired observers got in on the act of throwing baby seals bodies overboard, and even observers participating in the act, tampering with, and getting rid of the evidence.
To Anyone who tries to say the seal hunt is for the meat, above they clearly admit they garbage the meat.
Here is the Evidence sealers stood by and watched them drown. This debunks the myth it is humane.
This also debunks Anyone attempting to bring up 'slaughterhouses' to justify the seal hunt. Slaughter houses DO NOT have what is called "struck & lost" animals! This means, that in the seal hunt, these sealers may either club, or shoot an animal that slips into the water, and it is wounded. This means that animal continues to suffer. Hours, days, who knows how long. That act does not happen in a slaughter house. That situation does in fact happen in the Canadian Seal Hunt! And therefore it can Never compare in the same way to a slaughterhouse, Slaughter houses do Not have struck & lost animals. And thus the Canadian Seal Hunt can Never be certified as humane. It is inherently inhumane.
The above testimony also debunks the myth that it is well-regulated. These violations were allowed to continue.
And this testimony reveals conspiring between the crew, and the so-called DFO observers, all the way up to the Sealing captain.
Originally posted by DaMod
I do not have a problem with hunting animals. I am a hunter myself.
I do have a problem with hunting to endangerment or extinction. That is an atrocity.
Originally posted by grandnic
Originally posted by DaMod
I do not have a problem with hunting animals. I am a hunter myself.
I do have a problem with hunting to endangerment or extinction. That is an atrocity.
The Harp seal is not endangered. I'm all for seal hunts as long as it is controled and done humanely, like any other form of hunt or cattle slaughter.
However, the atlantic cod has been overfished and is now threatened. Spain and Portugal amonst others, have fished the cod schools just outside the limit of canadian water. They did not have any quota to respect. There has been a few incidents between the canadian navy and foreign fishing vessels. If we don't keep the seal population controled, the cod population will never get better.
Nobody care for the cod.
Because nobody see the cod.
Seal meat is quite good, I tried at a resto in Montreal last year. But real fresh atlantic cod is even better it's a shame that they don't take those huge cod like they used to in the 80's and before.
[edit on 20-1-2010 by grandnic]
Guess I was just looking for an excuse to use the new thread button???