It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Whatever. It's really no big deal.
Right. It really wasn't. But the big deal for all to see is how people in this particular forum act.
Just because someone percieves someone else as a "truther" nothing they say is correct. Which is the definition of fundamentalism.
Originally posted by Nutter
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
That is the problem with fundamentalism. A fundamentalist can never admit they were wrong.
Good bye to you and Joey. Neither of you are worth the time and/or aggravation
[edit on 21-7-2010 by Nutter]
Originally posted by wmd_2008
All the ENGINEERS I am in daily contact with are like above and my background is 30+ in the construction industry and when I left school my first job was an apprentinceship in the design/drawing office of a STRUCTURAL STEELWORK FABRICATOR so I do have a pretty good idea what is REQUIRED!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Nutter
all I'm saying is that architects have the ability, education and reasoning to do structural calculations.
Originally posted by Nutter
You can't critique something that you don't have the data for.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
You've lost the debate right there.
You're admitting that AE doesn't have data to base their statements on, therefore you are admitting that it is nothing more than an appeal to authority.
Does this bother you in the slightest?
Originally posted by Nutter
It would actually work in NIST's and the government's favor to be transparent
But they don't. Why?
This doesn't bother you?