It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Antichrist — Energy of the Will aspect of God, in its involutionary phase, which destroys the old forms and relationships, for example at the end of an age, to prepare the way for the building forces of the Christ Principle. Manifested in Roman times through the emperor Nero and in modern times through Hitler and six of his associates.
Q. When Maitreya presents Himself to the world, how do you think people will react to Him?
A. Well, it depends who they are. It depends on their religious background. It depends, I think, whether they are Piscean or Aquarian in their thinking. The world is divided into two: those who compete and those who co-operate. He is for co-operation, but those who cannot live without competing, those of Piscean consciousness, will tend to reject the idea of sharing and justice in the world as a condition for peace. It does not mean that they want war, but they certainly do not want peace if it means giving up anything. They do not see that you cannot for ever have a just society if in some parts of the world there is the very opposite. The world is one, and the sooner all peoples realize that the sooner we will have a decent world to live in.
The Prayer for the New Age
I am the creator of the universe.
I am the father and mother of the universe.
Everything comes from me.
Everything shall return to me.
Mind, spirit and body are my temples,
For the Self to realize in them My supreme Being and Becoming.
Benjamin Creme writes:
The Prayer for the New Age, given by Maitreya, the World Teacher, is a great mantram or affirmation with an invocative effect. It will be a powerful tool in the recognition by us that man and God are One, that there is no separation. The ‘I’ is the Divine Principle behind all creation. The Self emanates from, and is identical to, the Divine Principle. The most effective way to use this mantram is to say or think the words with focused will, while holding the attention at the ajna centre between the eyebrows. When the mind grasps the meaning of the concepts, and simultaneously the will is brought to bear, those concepts will be activated and the mantram will work. If it is said seriously every day, there will grow inside you a realization of your true Self. (Maitreya’s Teachings – The Laws of Life)
Originally posted by Dasher
reply to post by Neo__
Please stop projecting your own beliefs onto that of Creme's.
He specifically teaches what is corrupt, even more so, suggests that repetitious words will make what is untrue become true.
From: www.share-international.org...
The Prayer for the New Age
I am the creator of the universe.
I am the father and mother of the universe.
Everything comes from me.
Everything shall return to me.
Mind, spirit and body are my temples,
For the Self to realize in them My supreme Being and Becoming.
Benjamin Creme writes:
The Prayer for the New Age, given by Maitreya, the World Teacher, is a great mantram or affirmation with an invocative effect. It will be a powerful tool in the recognition by us that man and God are One, that there is no separation. The ‘I’ is the Divine Principle behind all creation. The Self emanates from, and is identical to, the Divine Principle. The most effective way to use this mantram is to say or think the words with focused will, while holding the attention at the ajna centre between the eyebrows. When the mind grasps the meaning of the concepts, and simultaneously the will is brought to bear, those concepts will be activated and the mantram will work. If it is said seriously every day, there will grow inside you a realization of your true Self. (Maitreya’s Teachings – The Laws of Life)
And I suppose that if, every day, he bawks like a chicken while focusing on his arms as though they are wings that he will also lay an egg.....
Q. You use the word God quite frequently. Could you give your view of what you mean by God? Can you define God?
A. Curiously enough, we don't often get this question. This is probably the most difficult question to answer. Who am I to say what God is? If I can say anything about it at all, I would say that in a sense there is no such thing as God, God does not exist. And in another sense, there is nothing else but God -- only God exists.
In asking me for a definition of God, you have asked for the impossible, but I shall attempt it. God, to me (I am speaking intellectually now, from which angle one cannot know God) is the sum total of all the laws, and all the energies governed by these laws, which make up the whole of the manifested and unmanifested universe. Everything we know and see and hear and touch and everything we don't know or hear or see or touch; everywhere, in the totality of cosmos, every manifested phenomenon is part of God. And the space between these manifested phenomena is God.
So, in a very real sense, there isn't anything else . You are God. I am God. This microphone is God. This table is God. All is God. And because all is God, there is no God. God is not someone that you can point to and say, "That is God". God is everything that you have ever known or could ever know and everything beyond your level of knowing. That God, unmanifested, uncreated; desires to know itself in all its possibilities, its possible aspects, and takes incarnation gradually; gradually involves itself in that opposite pole of itself which we call matter. Spirit and matter are two poles of reality or God. Both are part of the same totality. But as they go further and further in polarity distance from themselves, we get the pairs of opposites. We get good and evil, we get night and day, we get spirit and matter, and soon we are locked in the dilemma of the pairs of opposites.
Through the meditational process which takes us eventually into the knowledge of, and at-one-ment with, the soul aspect of ourselves, the divine aspect, we can resolve these two apparent opposites. In that resolution we stand between the two. That is where the knower stands, knowing that there is neither good nor evil, knowing that there is only one, there is only God. So you can come to know God in a certain way but no one can talk about it!
God cannot be known from the level from which I am speaking now. It is impossible. God can, I believe, be sensed and apprehended as an experience, from moment to moment only, as That which IS when we go beyond our thought and abide in that state of unthinking awareness of the totality, without sense of self. Then we can know God. Most of us, at the stage where we are, can know it perhaps for a fraction of a second or a few moments, but that second or few moments will give one the sense of its immortality and its infinity. That is all one can say about that experience afterwards. You cannot describe it. As soon as you describe it you are describing a memory, you are describing an experience which is no longer God.
It is something which cannot be talked about, it can only be known from moment to moment. Certain individuals, the Christ for example, can show you what God is like. This is what Christ in Palestine and the Buddha showed. They showed what God is like, in certain aspects. Only aspects -- even the Christ can only show aspects. He comes now to show a higher aspect than even the Love aspect which He showed before. It is a greater aspect, a more inclusive aspect of God, which He will reveal to mankind. This is the new revelation.
Originally posted by Dasher
reply to post by Neo__
4. God came into the flesh [in order to pass on to Their Children their ability to master the flesh. Their Children are promised such resurrection]. All contrary teachings are anti-christ.
Originally posted by skajkingdom
Originally posted by Dasherreply to post by Neo__
4. God came into the flesh [in order to pass on to Their Children their ability to master the flesh. Their Children are promised such resurrection]. All contrary teachings are anti-christ.
Even John you are quoting there does not say that GOD came into flesh. It says JESUS came into flesh.
The idea alone that God, a divine being, would become human, is preposterous - if God entered his Creation, and became human, then he became subject to his own laws governing his creation, thus CEASED TO BE GOD. And he was KILLED. If they killed God, who was running the universe?? ....
Sanat Kumara — The Lord of the World; the etheric-physical expression of our Planetary Logos Who dwells on Shamballa. A great Being, originally from Venus, Who sacrificed Himself to become the personality vehicle for the ensouling Deity of our planet 18.5 million years ago. The nearest aspect of God that we can know.
... It is the Physical Presence upon our planet of such recognized spiritual figures as the Lord of the World, the Ancient of Days; the seven Spirits Who are before the Throne of God; the Buddha, the spiritual leader of the East; and the Christ, the spiritual leader of the West – all of Whom are brought at this climaxing time to our attention.
Originally posted by Neo__If one is not open minded and detached then suffering occurs. This is, apparently, not a promise but more a natural law of life.
Originally posted by Amun86You never read something without a predisposition. So it is quite easy to read selectively what you want to read, what you want to believe, and ignore the interpretations or passages, which refer to something outside your comfort zone. There is nothing wrong with this because it is nearly inevitable. What you can do about it, is being critical. However, you do need to be open to other interpretations beforehand. Which might be the most difficult task.
Originally posted by skajkingdom
Christianity has really really gone too far. Your "God" is nothing like the Old Testament God - and all your TWISTING words where you try to reconcile your INVENTED 4th century doctrine with the REAL message of God is just inexcusable!
YOU MADE UP YOUR GOD!
You took a SERVANT of God - as is Jesus called MANY MANY TIMES - including the words "Son of God" you now find in your ENGLISH bibles, although the original hebrew word used for that term actually means SERVANT of GOD - and this SERVANT of GOD you made INTO GOD himself!
...
In general, if you bring arguments against them, christian apologists will bombard you with words, twisting them, talking around the bush, words, words, words. This is even worse if you dare to refute any christian claim, like the belief in Trinity. You can be sure of one thing, they will talk so much and say so little.
Originally posted by Dasher
The Jews were taught Order and the glory of God escaped their obtainment.
The Christians were taught Charity and the glory of God has escaped their obtainment.
This pattern continues except that God gives the gifts of OrderCharity to live within. There is no obtainment. Such boasting leads to death. There are only gifts. Such imagery leads to life.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by Barkster
But has Raj Patel given his FIRST TV interview recently?
If not he ain't the Maitraya as described by Creme,because I think it had to be his first TV appearence?NOt 100% on that though.
Can't help thinking the whole thing exists purely as an idea in Creme's head myself...Remind me to eat my words when the spaceships become visible,and the star,and we all hear and understand the words of Maitraya as if in our own language,worldwide.
Originally posted by Neo__
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by Barkster
But has Raj Patel given his FIRST TV interview recently?
If not he ain't the Maitraya as described by Creme,because I think it had to be his first TV appearence?NOt 100% on that though.
Can't help thinking the whole thing exists purely as an idea in Creme's head myself...Remind me to eat my words when the spaceships become visible,and the star,and we all hear and understand the words of Maitraya as if in our own language,worldwide.
That time is not far off. It will come when the Saquasohuh (Blue Star) Kachina dances in the plaza and removes his mask. He represents a blue star, far off and yet invisible, which will make its appearance soon. The time is foretold by a song sung during the Wuwuchim ceremony. It was sung in 1914 just before World War I, and again in 1940 before World War II, describing the disunity, corruption, and hatred contaminating Hopi rituals, which were followed by the same evils spreading over the world. This same song was sung in 1961 during the Wuwuchim ceremony.
Originally posted by Barkster
The more I look into this the more I think its Patel. He has given a few interviews lately. His books are about socialistic approach to the worlds problems. He is addressing the worlds problems in his books. His books are gaining popularity. He leaves clues as to who he is. He doesn't own the title yet because he wants to be accepted by his ideas not as a messianic figure. However he doesn't have to because creme is working that side of the coin for him.
With people being downright fervent for this guy to appear and with clues being put forth as to his identity, folks are buying his books and trying to get a heads up on where Patel stands. Just the rumor will be enough to fuel a hastening toward this personage, His philosophy, the maitreya, stepping forward and taking his position as such. Patel doesn't deny that he is Maitreya.
Originally posted by RMFX1
Originally posted by The X
Keep your wits about you because the moment it happens and you go "Pah its all a trick" prepare to be chased by hordes of people screaming "UNBELIEVER UNBELIEVER we must kill him in the name of the new messiah"......Lets wait and see.....
I've had this thought myself. It's a scary prospect.