I disagree. I don't think it was undead zombies, but deadhead cellphone looters
Originally posted by bonzye
Evidence 1.
Looting was very extreme after "earthquake".
Theory: People could of scattered for stuff to protect themselves from this zombie outbreak.
Or: Looting was so extreme, more then any other disaster before because of the huge amount of poverty.
Or: Looting was so extreme, more than any other disaster before, because of the huge number of imported cellphone looters. Imported from where, you
ask? Africa, Juárez, Somalia.
Evidence 2.
Theory: if it were a zombie outbreak, forms of transportation would be shut down to contain. Which actually happened. To cover it up, it was said
there was so much traffic there no planes could fly in or out. So all transportation was cut off. It was said there was only one airport, but there is
actually five! list here en.wikipedia.org... Coincidence?
Transportation cut off to facilitate movement of imported cellphone looters in and out of country
Evidence 3.
Theory: The virus may of hit Haiti first due to its poverty and low sanitation. Its shown poorest countries are affected first and the most by
diseases .
Evidence 4.
Theory: One of the biggest death tolls in history to earthquake. People are still dying every second, its almost amazing how so many could still be
dying even four days after a earthquake and no aftershocks.
Or: The disaster was so severe it still is killing people.
Or the cellphone looters are still killing people
Evidence 5.
Theory: It almost seems like a government cover up situation. Why would a government want to cover up a earthquake? Maybe to keep things calm?. The
government is being very careful what they release to the media.
Or: They want to keep things censored.
or they want to cover up the cellphone looters because they are working undercover for the CIA
I totally agree with you, but zombies are hard to recruit, while cell phone snatchers are much more readily available.
Why the cellphones? Every country no matter how impoverished has plenty of cellphones.
One in three persons -- 3.2 million in a land of nine million
-- had cellphones in 2008, according to the CIA Fact Book. But we didn't get thousands of cell phone pictures from Haitians about what they
were going through. My theory is that the Haitians were prevented from calling out by some interference. Then the cellphone snatchers snatched the
cell phones from the Haitians, either alive or killed by the quake or murdered by looters, and sold them somewhere else and got some money for them,
after first wiping them of incriminating pictures ofcourse. If the cell phones were not confiscated, any missed victims could call out later, and any
pictures taken with their cameras would become evidence. People wanting to donate money for Haiti relief can send their cell phones and they will
donate that amount.
Cellphones for Haiti Otherwise someone might want to know how come they suddenly have so
many cell phones for sale.
This may sound dark, but there is a lot more going on in Haiti then meets the eye. It may be just a coincidence that the red cross is asking for cell
phones for Haiti. The red cross should be positively above board where international conspiracies are concerned, however their track record, they
practically financed the Russian Revolutions for one, bears looking into. An account of how they financed the Russian Revolutions you can find in The
Creature from Jekyll Island.
The point being that no where in recorded history have 200,000 people been killed in an earthquake except maybe if the ground opened up and swallowed
them. In this case it didn't. It just collapsed some buildings. In China in May 2008 they lost 85,000, but not near 200,000. And this number was
estimated right off the bat. Why would anyone come up with such a huge estimate without first collecting data?
At least in China the relief work was carried out under the supervision of their own country. This relief was carried under the tight control of a
country whose leaders are known for wanting the world population reduced. I.e. Obama calling for a New World Order, when the New World Order's
primary agenda, second to consolidating its power, is to reduce the population by 5.5 billion
just a thought.
[edit on 24-3-2010 by m khan]