It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
Unless I misunderstood the point of the thread, this is about the huge disparity in the aid being given to Haiti. Israel doesn't need 30 billion dollars and yet they are getting a blank check for billions and our most powerful war machines. Haiti desperately needs aid and infrastructure to stabilize the country, reduce the extreme systemic poverty, help the injured, and rebuild from the destruction, yet they are only receiving a fraction of the amount of Israel.
Despite the serious financial crisis, the Americans did not raise the possibility of reducing the aid or cancelling it at any stage. Israel is bound by the agreement to use 75% of the security aid in dollars – in other words, to produce military devices in the US in order to help create workplaces there
Obama said the $100 million the government is initialing directing toward the relief effort would certainly grow over the year as the recovery turns from emergency to rebuilding the already deeply impoverished nation.
what a sick farce this country and its "leader" have become
Obama said the $100 million the government is initialing directing toward the relief effort would certainly grow over the year as the recovery turns from emergency to rebuilding the already deeply impoverished nation.
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
Unless I misunderstood the point of the thread, this is about the huge disparity in the aid being given to Haiti. Israel doesn't need 30 billion dollars and yet they are getting a blank check for billions and our most powerful war machines. Haiti desperately needs aid and infrastructure to stabilize the country, reduce the extreme systemic poverty, help the injured, and rebuild from the destruction, yet they are only receiving a fraction of the amount of Israel.
They are getting 30B over the next 10 years. It's not a lump sum payment. Also, 75% of it will be spent on military aid from the US, so the money will be employing Americans. At least that the theory.
Also, why is it the responsiblity of the US to stablize Haiti? I mean, we went to Iraq to stablize that country, and it seems like everyone on ATS freaks and geeks over that. So, why Haiti and not Iraq?
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
Nice job warping history.
We never went to Iraq to stabilize the country. We went to Iraq to get Saddam's WMDs because he had mobile labs creating biological weapons and terrorist training camps, remember?
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
I never said Israel was getting a lump sum, I said they were getting a blank check, which means they basically get a free pass from the American government and access to our coffers with little or no restrictions.
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
II agree that it's not the responsibility of the US government to stabilize Haiti. I was making a point that instead of us blowing cash like it's nothing in the Middle East, we could have used it for countries in our own back yard to create a stable continent for ourselves.
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
Also, stabilizing a country after a decimating Earthquake that has killed tens of thousands of people and left the island in tatters is a far cry from a muscular shock and awe campaign in a Middle Eastern country that had nothing to do with terrorism or the US and didn't want us within their borders.
It's a complete apples and oranges comparison.
Originally posted by rufusdrak
Thanks for owning that guy. He truly has no clue. To him INVADING a country and killing hundreds of thousands of civilians as we did in Iraq is equivalent to sending AID to a country ravaged by an earthquake? What a brainwashed sheeple.
The World Bank reported last February that virtually all its projects in Haiti in the past fifteen years failed because of ineffective and corrupt government. "The Bank and other donors erred by offering traditional assistance programs without identifying the fundamental governance and political barriers to development." Kidder would have us repeat that error.
In fact, aid to the Haitian government today would be, as Rep. Otto Passman used to say in his incomparable Louisiana drawl, "taking money from the poor folks in the rich countries and giving it to rich folks in the poor countries."
The government officials in Haiti make the people who run the cities of Atlanta, Baltimore and Detroit look like the Swiss in comparison
Former Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide's government illegally pumped at least $21 million of his country's meager public funds into private firms that existed only on paper and into his charities, government investigators allege.
The investigators reported that about $2.4 million went directly to charities tied to Aristide and his political party, allowing him to take credit for humanitarian works and strengthening his image as a champion of Haiti's poor.
But the bulk of the money is still unaccounted for, according to a report by the Central Unit for Economic and Financial Investigations, or UCREF, created by the interim government that replaced Aristide after his ouster last year.
The "right" group to give to in this -- or any -- disaster is any of the many with a solid reputation for being even-handed and competent, and -- very importantly -already active where the need is greatest. In other words, one with staff who know the victims and the turf, as well as what assistance and supplies are available, what's coming from outside, and how to get it to where it's needed
HOW YOU CAN HELP
A coalition of CARE, Oxfam and Save the Children
www.thehumanitariancoalition.ca
1 800 464 9154
Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace
www.devp.org