It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Parallex
I have made threads like this before, as well as commented on the fundies, and usually, I get shot down or shut up / censored by moderators. We can't bash the fundies
Originally posted by masqua
Originally posted by Parallex
I have made threads like this before, as well as commented on the fundies, and usually, I get shot down or shut up / censored by moderators. We can't bash the fundies
As an agnostic within the group you mention, I must take umbrage with the statement quoted. There is a wide mix of personal belief within the staff and no one staffer acts on their own without the rest being in the know of what went down.
Yes. There are a lot of threads and posts concerning religious issues which pepper the forums. That's to be expected when the majority of humankind has religion. That it winds up being discussed on a board which promotes social commentary is no surprise to me.
Debate and critical thinking is the proper way to debate such issues, either pro or con.
Originally posted by Parallex
The next time a fundie posts nothing but 'doomsaying' and scripture in a thread, or commits an adhom attack on someone for not being a Christian (these things do not contribute to discussion, they only promote Christianity virally) - I fully expect the moderators to do their duty and delete or edit the post. Is that fair?
Originally posted by kenochs
I'm a journalist by trade... But I have always hoped, and used to see more posters adhering to at least the basic principles of scientific inquiry, on this site. What I am seeing now is a complete abandonment of those rules and more and more posters whose skepticism swings towards an abandonment of science altogether. What that means to me is a flood of people who throw evolution, and climate change and 'scientists' into their over-arching vision of a nightmarish conspiracy against the everyman.
To me that's a bit like saying 'gravity is a conspiracy to keep us all down'. It takes away from what I have always thought is a wonderful venue to examine the fringes of 'scientific' thinking.
I find it sad.
Originally posted by On the Edge
"...biggest fundamental religious event that occurred over the past two years was a farce called global warming?"....
How did religious fundamentalism get mixed up with that?!
(If you were only kidding,sorry if I didn't catch it!)
Originally posted by kenochs
I'm a journalist by trade, and when I originally began reading a year or two ago I found this to be a site to get a lead on interesting events going on terrestrially and otherwise and to read some reasonably intelligent scientific discussion of events that don't get a whole lot of press.
I'm a trained skeptic and used to really enjoy the give and take with those far more credulous and generally it's been a lot of fun.
But lately I can't open any thread, especially threads related to Obama or 2012 without someone telling me the end times are coming and Obama is the Anti-Christ and that I need to get right with God. And as we all know, it is impossible to have a scientific discussion about faith, its counterintuitive, and counterproductive.
Faith... is, and if you believe, well, generally I find that's that. I got no problem with accepting the great unknowable.
But I have always hoped, and used to see more posters adhering to at least the basic principles of scientific inquiry, on this site. What I am seeing now is a complete abandonment of those rules and more and more posters whose skepticism swings towards an abandonment of science altogether. What that means to me is a flood of people who throw evolution, and climate change and 'scientists' into their over-arching vision of a nightmarish conspiracy against the everyman.
To me that's a bit like saying 'gravity is a conspiracy to keep us all down'. It takes away from what I have always thought is a wonderful venue to examine the fringes of 'scientific' thinking.
I find it sad. Any thoughts?
[edit on 14-1-2010 by kenochs]
Originally posted by Sigismundus
There's only one real BIG problem with today's so-called right wing christian 'fundamentalists' especially in the US - they purport to 'believe every word of the bible' but 99.9% of these persons cannot read a single word of Koine Greek, Unpointed Paleo-Hebrew and have even less Galilean Aramaic under their belts.
Also, the vast majority have ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE as to how the books that form their 'bible' came to be voted into the 'bible' by all those raucous councils in antiquity (most of whom were casting aspersions at other councils who were casting aspersions at them) and harldy any of them are conversant with the hand-copied (and therefore 'hand-manipulated') manuscript mess of both the so-called 'old' and 'new' testaments of their 'bible' in different places and different times before c. the year 400 CE-- and all the deliberate changes that occured to the texts over time in different places, especially at the very very earliest stages of their written transmission (even more so from the oral to the written stages).
Added to this, very very very few of modern day persons who style themeselves as 'fundamentalist Christians' have any kind of working knowledge of the actual contents of the Dead Sea Scroll material found in Caves 1-11 at Qumran (beisdes not being able to read them for themselves, that is !) or the very very very very sticky contradictory MSS Old Testament situation unravelled by Origen in his Hexapla of the various versions of the Greek 'Old Testaments' that were circulating from around 150BCE to his own time in the early 3rd century (e.g. Symmachus, Aquilla, Theodotion and others)--which was further compounded when Caves 1, 4 and 11 were re-opened beginning in Nov of 1946 at Qumran (despite the Ecole Biblique's plan to keeping these facts a secret away from the prying eyes of the masses for more than 40 years)...
Even more serious is the fact that most of today's 'fundamentalist Christians' have little working knowledge of the 1st century Judaean Messianic movements that sprouted up over time in Palestine during successive waves of Occupation (Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Roman) and the brief periods of political Liberation in places (i.e. the Macabbean revolt which freed Jerusalem from the Syrian Greeks in 140BCE ) and the reaction to those events as they played out in the arrest and execution for 'armed sedition against Rome' ('Luke' 22:35-40) of their purported founder during the 'Insurrection' in 36 CE (see 'Mark' 14:53-56)
One 'originally-fundamentalist Christian' scholar--(Dr Bart Erhman, resident now in North Carolina)--once he got deep into the textual weeds of the NT by studying all the contradictory new testament texts (5446 Greek MSS, no two alike), eventually had a near nervous breakdown and threw up his hands after 10 years of soul searching and became....(shock and awe !) an 'agnostic'.
So technically, unless all these uneducated modern fundamentalist
'Christians' can get under their own belt the literary and historical tools they need actually to READ & UNDERSTAND THE VERY TEXTS they PURPORT TO BELIEVE EVERY WORD OF, they are just so much HOT AIR 'blowin in the wind...'
[edit on 14-1-2010 by Sigismundus]