It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kenochs
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand
Also, wouldn't it be nice if there were a sure thing... well beyond the knowledge of our own mortality.
[edit on 14-1-2010 by kenochs]
Originally posted by kenochs
reply to post by The Riley Family
I think the point I was trying to make is this: in many faith based paradigms, there is a very definitive attempt to defuse any logical arguments based on the fact that they're logical.
I you look at some of the published speeches from the discovery institute folks they talk repeatedly about defusing logical arguments.
They do this by suggesting there are two ways of looking at the world, the bible based view, which uses as its foundation the teachings of the Bible, and the beginning point for all intellectual viewpoints is based on what the Bible says.
The argument then goes that us scientifically minded folks can never understand bible based believers because we don't accept their beginning thesis, that the Bible is the unalterable word of God and that it is the basis for all truth.
You can't really have a thoughtful discussion when the end point of the argument is: because the Bible says so.
Originally posted by kenochs
reply to post by The Riley Family
I'm not sure I understand your point anymore... I didn't say anything about accepting it. What I said is that I am okay of the concept that some things are unknowable, be it in reference to God, or to what came before the Big Bang (though I actually think that's knowable, or will be).
I accept it because the people who believe it don't use science as their basis for believing... they use faith.
I don't question someone's faith, I question someone who uses their faith to make a quasi-scientific explanation for how the world works.
In other words, if you want to believe that God made the world in 6 days more power to you. I am aware that any amount of science I lay down to suggest otherwise, you won't accept. So, I have to let it go.
So, the issue I have on ATS, are people telling me that humans rode dinosaurs, and put unicorns on the Ark, and the can prove it. If you suggest otherwise and lay out scientific points to prove your point, the ultimate end to the argument is... the bible says so.
Still, maybe you and I are talking at cross purposes here.
Originally posted by kenochs
reply to post by The Riley Family
I don't question someone's faith, I question someone who uses their faith to make a quasi-scientific explanation for how the world works.
In other words, if you want to believe that God made the world in 6 days more power to you. I am aware that any amount of science I lay down to suggest otherwise, you won't accept. So, I have to let it go.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by autowrench
Thought so. Rant off. One more thing, before I go, just in case you are in denial....
1000 Years of Carnage & Barbarity in the name of Christ
Originally posted by nixie_nox
I call it the Glen Beck effect. He makes a living by letting people think they are in on something no one else knows or has figured out.A speudo conspiracy theory.
So naturally whats the next step? a website.
That is why you see so many Obama rantings and religion and etc. Just watch Glen Beck and you will see it show up on ATS.
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
reply to post by kenochs
I think Julian Jaynes' "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind" will shed light on why religion and feelings of faith arise in virtually every single instance of human development and how the vestiges of our past are carried forward into the present through the expression of religious and political structures used for social control.
Brilliant man.