It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hangedman13
reply to post by skunknuts
Yeah, yeah, yeah, as if Bush didn't send aid to countries after national disaster. What was being pointed out was that Obama and co. would turn this in to a p.r. moment. Can anyone point out when a sitting potus didn't send aid after a natural disaster? The difference is how the event is spun.
Originally posted by rainfall
And why does he have to bring up light-skinned and dark-skinned blacks???
Originally posted by skunknuts
The country is turning against this non-sense. You will see what happens in Massachusetts next week. For all your vitriol and hope, it will be nothing but a big letdown. You all are going to become even bigger sore losers, if that is actually possible.
Best,
Skunknuts
Originally posted by rainfall
And why does he have to bring up light-skinned and dark-skinned blacks???
Originally posted by Carseller4
Originally posted by skunknuts
The country is turning against this non-sense. You will see what happens in Massachusetts next week. For all your vitriol and hope, it will be nothing but a big letdown. You all are going to become even bigger sore losers, if that is actually possible.
Best,
Skunknuts
The fact that Massachusetts is even close is a victory for Republicans. At least we are putting up a fight and making them send in the big guns, big donors and big special interests to spend money they normally wouldn't have to spend.
It's a win-win situation for Republicans.
Originally posted by genius/idoit
reply to post by skunknuts
Is that the election where the atty.generals aide assaulted a reporter and she did nothing?That's who your hoping wins?Is that because you believe her policies are the best for Massachusetts and the country or obama?
[edit on 13-1-2010 by genius/idoit]
Originally posted by joey_hv
Rush hits the nail on the head once again. He seems to know the libs better than they know themselves. Hypocritical idiots.
"And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused, convicted, and sent up the river. What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. too many whites are getting away with drug sales, and too many whites are getting away with drug trafficking in this stuff. the answer for this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail, because we're not putting people in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them, and send them to jail too".
Wouldn't your money be better spent destroying Charlie Christ (R) in Florida, and guaranteeing a democratic senator (I mean, go rubio, go!!)
Originally posted by Becker44
reply to post by skunknuts
I'm not sure if I understand your statement correctly:
Wouldn't your money be better spent destroying Charlie Christ (R) in Florida, and guaranteeing a democratic senator (I mean, go rubio, go!!)
Are you aware Marco Rubio is a republican?
en.wikipedia.org...
While your raging against the conservatives I just thought you might want to be factual to bolster your impressive and deeply thought provoking tirades
PS: The Wisconsin thing has given you away. Of course you are a liberal. You'd have to move otherwise!
Becker
Originally posted by WTFover
Making judgments based on 43 second clips is quite narrow minded.
Originally posted by On the Edge
reply to post by skunknuts
orangejuiceblog.com...
I wonder if he had a medical prescription for this.
At least Rush faced his problem. Many good people who suffer extreme pain become addicted.