Giza Pyramid Machines: Their true purpose finally revealed.

originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Byrd

The most obvious noticeable missing features from the outside have to be either the lack of casing stones or the fact that the pyramid has no top. It is generally agreed that the casing stones have been gradually removed and used as masonry for local building projects in Cairo. The capstone or 'Ben-Ben', which one would normally assume to be found on top of any pyramid, is however, conspicuously missing. Although there are various myths surrounding it, there are no recorded eye-witness accounts, which suggests that it either never existed or that it was 'lost' at some time in the distant past. There is no myth or story (That I know of), of it having been stolen or destroyed. It is not mentioned by Herodotus (which more suggests that it was there). In fact historians as far back as the time of Christ described it as both 'perfect and topless'.

That would be 2500 years after it was first built, and 1000 years after they started using it as a "quarry" for stone. And yes, bits and pieces of the cladding are all over Cairo. Why dig for stone when there's this big ruined monument with lovely stone just for the taking.

As I understand it, the capstone might have been electrum. It could have well been carried off by one of the pharaohs of the Middle Kingdom or New Kingdom -- they repurposed graves and temples regularly.

i found that there is a fine geopolymer used in the construction of the blocks

Not true. If you walk up to the pyramid (I have been there) and look at the rocks and if you've taken geology, you will recognize it as limestone... and you can even see the bedding planes. Cast material is uniform in consistency. This is pretty clearly not.

Besides, the blocks are all of different sizes. Who would construct individual molds for each of the million stones in the pyramids (rather than mass casting them) and wait for 3 weeks while each block hardened? It takes less time than that to quarry the block from the soft limestone.

The Romans were the first to invent concrete... about 2,000 years after Giza.

a reply to: Byrd

ah very interesting, will get back to this but i have to go to work and build something slightly less impressive

a reply to: Byrd


As I understand it, the capstone might have been electrum. It could have well been carried off by one of the pharaohs of the Middle Kingdom or New Kingdom -- they repurposed graves and temples regularly.

couldnt find this. pliny talked about capstones on obelisks.
obviously its an attractive assumption that the pyramidal form is followed through
i am sure the cement, which to clarify is only in these upper layers, (alledgedly) is a repair.
but again i keep these questions coming because theres just alot of hearsay
so many theories. and obviously every contention must be assessed on its individual merits
the thing is ... it wasnt exactly accessible, and try and imagine moving it. where do you stand?
if it was big you would need an earthquake to remove it

a reply to: Byrd

i found that there is a fine geopolymer used in the construction of the blocks

ah, maybe a misunderstanding. i dont mean as cast concrete, just stuck together

Well you are not the first one to suggest it is a power plant.. Instead of aliens you should probably should have said annunaki aka Sumerian texts.. If you are familiar with Joseph Patrick Farrell he did a series of books on Giza. his research is based on ancient documents. He has suggested that Giza is a WMD on a planetary scale and possibly a power plant. There was also a reference to a war of the 2 pyramids .. Well you have to read them yourself n decide .

Well you are not the first one to suggest it is a power plant.. Instead of aliens you should probably should have said annunaki aka Sumerian texts.. If you are familiar with Joseph Patrick Farrell he did a series of books on Giza. his research is based on ancient documents. He has suggested that Giza is a WMD on a planetary scale and possibly a power plant. There was also a reference to a war of the 2 pyramids .. Well you have to read them yourself n decide .

originally posted by: rustywho Instead of aliens you should probably should have said annunaki aka Sumerian texts.. .

aka Zechariah Sitchins unsupported version of the Sumerian texts, where the Annunaki are aliens from the planet Nibiru
the real texts can be found here
etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk...

hi.heres my take on how they got them blocks up high. simple.you kept the blocks on the floating barge up the nile. dug a channel from nile right up to were your building your pyramid start laying your blocks and build a lock system inside said pyramid to your desired high pull the block from your wooden barge fit in is place. release the water back into a holding chamber and do it all over again. so block leaves source stays on barge to its finale resting place. it would only take a couple of camels to pull the blocks. everone of us could lift 1000s of tons by ourself and no even brake a sweat. easy massive cruise liner moves into lock shut the lock gates and then we get our garden hose out and fill the lock with water.the boat floats and there you have it. we can lift it by ourselfs no massive manpower needed. just a hose and some water. what do you think?.

originally posted by: Harte
In fact, there exists very strong evidence that some tombs, including Khufu's, werre actually robbed by the priests themselves, acting on behalf of the priesthood because the "government" was out of money.

Harte

Pity you could not provide this evidence for the Khufu pyramid. I guess some of us prefer to believe in concocted fantasies than in real evidence....

a reply to: username74

its got something to do with the 3 stars directly above them. and looking at it could look like an dierection arrow from outer space pointing the aliens to the exact spot . or they could have khowing there was going to be an impending disaster the shape the size and strenth the weight could maybe have saved the kings from a massive sunami

originally posted by: glen007
a reply to: username74

its got something to do with the 3 stars directly above them. and looking at it could look like an dierection arrow from outer space pointing the aliens to the exact spot . or they could have khowing there was going to be an impending disaster the shape the size and strenth the weight could maybe have saved the kings from a massive sunami

You may not be aware of it, but the stars aren't sitting on a flat background. They're billions of miles from each other and only appear to "line up" if you're in our solar system.

They don't actually "point" to anything.

originally posted by: micpsi

originally posted by: Harte
In fact, there exists very strong evidence that some tombs, including Khufu's, werre actually robbed by the priests themselves, acting on behalf of the priesthood because the "government" was out of money.

Harte

Pity you could not provide this evidence for the Khufu pyramid. I guess some of us prefer to believe in concocted fantasies than in real evidence....

There's precious little evidence for anything regarding Khufu. You wouldn't exactly expect scribes, who were also priests or working for priests, to document such a larceny anyway.
However, there is plenty of evidence of tomb robbing, and evidence that the actual entrance to the GP was well known in an era prior to it being dug into by the Arabs. The fact that I don't provide links to said evidence merely reflects my own laziness and my disinterest in whether or not people care to accept it as fact.

Harte

The estimated volume of removed bedrock stone matches without any problem with the actual volume of stone material used for the great Pyramid.
Just south of it.

Volume cubic meters
Khufu pyramid 2,590,000
Khufu quarry 2,760,000

the quarry was mostly exploited before the second pyramid (Khafre, 2520-2494 BC) was built at Giza because Khafre’s children built tombs in the west walls of the quarry.

The size, location, and dating makes a good argument for identifying this big hole in the Mokkatam Formation as the Khufu quarry.

www.aeraweb.org...

originally posted by: seattletruth
I know that everybody and their sister has a theory of what the Giza pyramids were built for, but every single one them doesn't really explain what the machine truly accomplished, or tie in how they were built to the purpose of the largest machines in the world. At this point anyone who has researched the issue at all knows that one thing is for certain: they weren't burial tombs. Not a single mummy was found. No hieroglyphs whatsoever inside the "King's Chamber".

Only after researching alternative technologies that are held back by the powers that be, have I thought of a coherent theory which ties many aspects and mysteries of the pyramids together. Some of the technologies I'll be talking about seem so far fetched, and you might be quick to call me crazy. I implore you to actually research each and every one of these technologies in detail, and the science that makes them work. These technologies are real, and make scientific sense, although at this time, they haven't been fully explored or mastered by the general populace (although probably by military). Some of these technologies were in fact mastered by rogue geniuses within the last century, who unfortunately took their mastery to the grave with them. Still, at this point in time, there are enough clues to put the pieces together and have a basic understanding of the principles behind these technologies.


One thing that's apparent about the pyramids is that whoever built them were masters of sound. Masters of Frequency. I'm not saying they could eat beans and toot Beethoven's 5th on command, I'm saying that they knew the true powers that sounds and frequencies could yield. It's common knowledge that the dimensions of the chambers of the pyramid actually create resonating chambers for sound. Check out this page for more information.www.humanresonance.org...

Well, that's cool I guess. Maybe they just liked to yodel loud enough to piss off the town folks. Just kidding. There has to be a reason to why they'd be resonating sounds.

Now, lets skip to a theory that was posted on ATS recently that revealed that the underground chambers in the Gizamids were actually part of a "hydraulic ram pump". Meaning that they were using the water and from the Nile to pump water up inside the pyramid. It's an ingenious concept because it requires no external power source other than the flowing water. Here's an explanation of how a hydraulic ram pump works:www.howstuffworks.com.... And here's a video showing evidence of it in the pyramid, and also built SCALE MODELS of the device in action.

Ok, remember I said that whoever built the pyramids were true masters of sound / frequency? I'm sure many people are also aware of "acoustic levitation" or "harmonic grid levitation" or "resonant levitation" or whatever you want to call it. This is actually the most prominent theory that explains exactly how these massive stones, anywhere from a few tonnes, up to 100s of tonnes were not only moved from their quarries, but also how they were stacked without using gigantic steel cranes and modern machinery. The best evidence that this technique was used (besides the lack of trees in Egypt which could have been used to roll the stones), is the stacks of blocks that were relieved from the around the Sphinx. I'm sure all of you guys know the Sphinx was carved, not built. But in order to carve it, they had to first cut out the area surrounding it. If humans using hand tools and normal means of building had quarried the relief stones around the Sphinx, they would have cut and removed them in maybe 50 lb blocks, or 100 lb blocks, or maybe 500 lb blocks. Instead, the massive stones quarried were actually 200 tonne blocks. And not only did they move them nearby, but they stacked these 200 tonne blocks. Not something that a normal logical human with hand tools and vine ropes would do, right? Geological analysis of the blocks prove exactly where they came from.


This resonant frequency levitation was also mastered by Ed Leedskalnin, who built the magnificent Coral Castle in Florida in the first half of 1900s. He was not much taller than 5' and weighed less than 120lbs, yet was able to cut, move and stack 15-30 tonne blocks by himself. Here's a documentary explaining the basic theory and how Coral Castle in general.

Basically, how harmonic levitation works is this: The crystalline structure of the blocks is made of dipole molecules. A dipole means that it has a magnetic positive and negative. Every stone / molecule a series of harmonic frequencies that cause the poles of the molecules to arrange in a specific manner. When the correct arrangement of the magnetic poles is achieved, it will literally repel the gravity of earth, and will levitate.

Ok, so it's just a theory, you say? No proof, huh? Hutchinson effects work on basically the same principles. Watch this video to see some proof of various objects levitating and doing weird things that can't be explained by normal physics. Watch the 70 lb metal ball float, amongst other things.

Hutchinson may not have mastery of these effects, but the technology has none the less been suppressed. In the early 90s he was given a $20k grant and flown to Ft. Detrick to study the effects further. After he taught the army everything he knew, they canceled further research and told him to get lost. Being a Canadian, they sure weren't going to teach him what they knew, or help to further the technology without secrecy.

Back to the ancient Egyptians, there's some more mysteries that have yet to be explained. Hieroglyphs might not be prevalent in the pyramids themselves, but in pitch-black temples and tombs nearby they are literally covered with hieroglyphs on the ceilings. Yet no soot or sulfur residues were left behind. Not even a trace. People have tried to align mirrors to shine light in, but it just doesn't work after a few turns in the temples. Some external source of energy must have been used. There's even hieroglyphs that some people claim are pictures of a light bulb.

.


...continued in part 2.


[edit on 9-1-2010 by seattletruth]

ok I'm very late to the party, but this is my favorite OP on ATS period. Pure GENIUS!! I'm floored, I think you really figured it out. However I believe that human beings built the pyramids and the Sphinx but it happened in the very very distant past (maybe 100,000's of years ago maybe longer) before the world was destroyed by whatever cataclysm that gave birth to the great flood story, and humanity had to start over.

pyramids were built by satan. I thought pyramids were tesla coils?

imagine if pyramids provided egypt with both water and electricity. the reason satan built the pyramids was so he will be worshipped by the egyptians as their god.

this is why freemasons refer to satan as the great architect.

nephilims also helped. in fact they were recorded in one of the hieroglyphs as the actual builders of the pyramids.

each single stone block of a pyramid weighed more than 2 tons.

aliens do not exist. earth is flat. and einstein was a zionist fraud working for the jesuits.

a reply to: seattletruth

great job bro. I actually enjoyed it very much.

who else is master of frequency? are you talking about satan or tesla? lol

don't worry about people who are very quick to call you crazy. they are just retarded shills trying to gaslight.

they use saul alinsky's work, rules for radicals, which is dedicated to satan.

in fact, ATS in general is funded by CFR's initiative to serve as a honey pot or limited hangout.

it's called controlled opposition. I hope you are well 'til this day.

although I don't believe in aliens, since we actually live under the blue ice dome firmament.

TPTB is actually Venice. they are head quartered in San Marino today.

don't get the wrong idea. Venice is evil. they are twisted cannibalistic psychopaths!

and you are right they are descendants of the Pharaohs and also Roman patrician Senate.

these Venetians control the world's finance and economy from London, through the Crown Company.

headed by a Lord Mayor, 25 Aldermen and 100 lower house members, who are all bloodline families.

their servants are the barristers so called freemen laymen who are members of City of London livery.

they control all central banks and intelligence agencies in the world through Jesuit Malta order, Freemasonry and other secret societies.

ah and nukes don't exist. so called nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers run solely on hydrogen fuel. it's swimming on its own fuel source, in case you haven't noticed.

gravity also doesn't exist. there is no such thing as outer space and black holes.

the sun is some type of LED powered by a telsa coil. which is the earth's magnetic field.

here are some videos I'd like to share, enjoy:












I hope you folks found the videos enlightening in case you never seen them before. and keep spreading the truth because...

thedailyquotes.com...

The word "Pyramid" comes from Greek : "Pyra" = Fire "mid"= Middle (or centre) "Fire in the middle " WHY?
It is not describing a geometrical shape, but a description of function. Why is this?

a reply to: seattletruth

genius inventor seriously???? He copied how to make electrolysis cell, and not a good one. separating oxygen and hydrogen isnt hard the problem is you use more energy than you get out of the system. He would cheat by using batteries he had already charged and his motors ran only as long as he had enough batteries to sustain the reaction. Now some of the electrolysis cells are very close to one to one ratio meaning the almost produce as much energy as they use. This means its useful to convert energy like on say the space shuttle where you can use it to help supply oxygen as well.

originally posted by: bluesfreak
The word "Pyramid" comes from Greek : "Pyra" = Fire "mid"= Middle (or centre) "Fire in the middle " WHY?
It is not describing a geometrical shape, but a description of function. Why is this?

No, it doesn't.
Current thought is the Greek term comes from the Egyptian word "pimar." As far as I can tell, "pimar" translates roughly as "man inside."

Alternatively, the Greek word for pyramid is possibly from the word pyramis, which was a type of wheat cake the Greeks ate that, when baked, had a pointy top - like a pyramid.

Your translation was made up by a fringe scam artist after your money.

Harte

So " pyra " doesn't mean 'fire' in Greek and " mid " doesn't mean 'middle' or central in Greek , is that what you are saying? Which fringe scam artist are you referring to, please?
I don't purport to have all the answers, just curious, that's all
a reply to: Harte