It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by audibear
reply to post by InhaleExhale
Interesting accusation, yet far from the truth. First of all, I don't posses the arrogance to believe we are the only sentient beings in the universe. Humankind hasn't even learned to crawl yet much less walk. I try to remain objective and base my findings on observations. Not just my own either. Energy was created and used for a specific purpose. That my friend is the knowledge I seek. WHAT WAS THAT PURPOSE?
Howdy audibear
Interesting remarks
You said this
Humankind hasn't even learned to crawl yet much less walk
Then said this
I try to remain objective and base my findings on observations
...and what observation leads you to make the first statement - to what criteria/race are you comparing humankind too?
Alex Whitaker of Ancient-Wisdom.co.uk:
Whilst I have not received any training in prehistory, I respect the value of empirical research and have attempted to maintain a fully referenced academic standard throughout.
Originally posted by R0CR13
.
reply to post by Hanslune
What purpose would it serve to "summarize" ..you cant even see the scorched granite in the coffer .
There is a wealth of information that traditional (dogmatic) believers in the academic line refuse to acknowledge .
So presenting an incomplete picture of complex process of interactions is worthless except to offer you another opportunity to dismiss offhand what you do not understand .
Originally posted by audibear
Wow! I could put in supporting evidence and will at a later date.
I don't have all the proof to prove my hypothesis so would some of you folks due me the honor of disproving me?
I'm having a hard time with that one. I am not linking man made technologies to the machine. I am theorizing it is all natural materials assembled in a form that works. The simplicity is the beauty. A working creation in very simple form.
I see granite and perhaps soot - what scorches granite and what does that look like? That particular piece of granite is chocolate coloured,...
You mean all the information that contradicts itself ....... ?
Originally posted by R0CR13
It is NOT chocolate colored that is residue from usage .. once cleaned it is clearly Aswan rose granite !
The interior being more distressed than the exterior
You want a quick answer but refuse to consider the evidence before your eyes .
It is you that lack understanding and your traditional bias is your stumbling block .
Originally posted by R0CR13
.
You really want to do this ?
Ok but it will not be one sided .
I'd like to start with construction location orientation and materials used in construction and the reasons for their selection with special focus on the attributes of the materials ...
Why don't you begin by giving us the traditional perspective .
.
originally posted by: flubbnutts
All the clues are there, If anybody can provide any reason to refute my theory i would be happy to hear from them
The mere fact that the internal walls of the chambers are not covered in hieroglyphs defies logic.
If it were indeed a burial chamber there would be spells or something adorning the walls to send them to the afterlife. They were deeply mystical people after all.