It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Magnitude 6.5
Date-Time
* Sunday, January 10, 2010 at 00:27:39 UTC
* Saturday, January 09, 2010 at 04:27:39 PM at epicenter
Location 40.674°N, 124.655°W
Depth 16.4 km (10.2 miles)
Region OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances
* 35 km (22 miles) WNW (288°) from Ferndale, CA
* 39 km (24 miles) W (261°) from Humboldt Hill, CA
* 41 km (26 miles) WSW (256°) from Bayview, CA
* 43 km (27 miles) WSW (253°) from Eureka, CA
* 361 km (224 miles) NW (312°) from Sacramento, CA
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.7 km (0.4 miles); depth +/- 1.1 km
Originally posted by whoshotJR
reply to post by Phlynx
She is still rumbling with those aftershocks. Lets just hope they are all actually after shocks and not just preshocks for a much bigger.
A powerful 6.5 magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of northern California on Saturday, the US Geological Survey said.
Local media said police in Ferndale reported some damage to the city hall building, but gave no initial reports of injuries.
Originally posted by alysha.angel
hisz.rsoe.hu...
acording to this site there was a 6.2 on land in northern cali why isnt usgs picking it up?
Originally posted by alysha.angel
hisz.rsoe.hu...
acording to this site there was a 6.2 on land in northern cali why isnt usgs picking it up?
Originally posted by phoenix103
Originally posted by alysha.angel
hisz.rsoe.hu...
acording to this site there was a 6.2 on land in northern cali why isnt usgs picking it up?
Your post reads like you think USGS are wrong.
Lets face it, that other site uses data originating from USGS somewhere down the line.
Due to dodgy software/conversion of the data is obvious a few details have been offset from the 6.5.
Yes, this may be a conspiracy theory but don't assume everything is one!
Originally posted by Phlynx
Originally posted by phoenix103
Originally posted by alysha.angel
hisz.rsoe.hu...
acording to this site there was a 6.2 on land in northern cali why isnt usgs picking it up?
Your post reads like you think USGS are wrong.
Lets face it, that other site uses data originating from USGS somewhere down the line.
Due to dodgy software/conversion of the data is obvious a few details have been offset from the 6.5.
Yes, this may be a conspiracy theory but don't assume everything is one!
Where did you hear him say that it was a conspiracy theory?
Originally posted by Phlynx
Originally posted by alysha.angel
hisz.rsoe.hu...
acording to this site there was a 6.2 on land in northern cali why isnt usgs picking it up?
That's odd. If there's two, that's a bad thing. There was just a 3.6 earthquake, offshore again. If you have firefox, download the equake app thing. That's how I found out so fast. It shakes the browser screen whenever there is an earthquake
Originally posted by alysha.angel
Originally posted by Phlynx
Originally posted by alysha.angel
hisz.rsoe.hu...
acording to this site there was a 6.2 on land in northern cali why isnt usgs picking it up?
That's odd. If there's two, that's a bad thing. There was just a 3.6 earthquake, offshore again. If you have firefox, download the equake app thing. That's how I found out so fast. It shakes the browser screen whenever there is an earthquake
ha i had it installed for over a year now , but i just dont trust the usgs
also the two are to far apart to be mistaken
[edit on 9/1/10 by alysha.angel]
Originally posted by phoenix103
Originally posted by Phlynx
Originally posted by phoenix103
Originally posted by alysha.angel
hisz.rsoe.hu...
acording to this site there was a 6.2 on land in northern cali why isnt usgs picking it up?
Your post reads like you think USGS are wrong.
Lets face it, that other site uses data originating from USGS somewhere down the line.
Due to dodgy software/conversion of the data is obvious a few details have been offset from the 6.5.
Yes, this may be a conspiracy theory but don't assume everything is one!
Where did you hear him say that it was a conspiracy theory?
The tone and content of their post indicates they felt USGS was wrong. As the "its a conspiracy theory site" is the usual defence for not considering a situation, i felt it prudent to nip that in the bud beforehand.
I've actually looked at the other site and see no such thing anyway. The recent quakes for California clearly are located offshore.