It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
The source - the FBI! As you well know - a spokesman for the FBI stated that 95% was recovered. Prove him wrong or prove he is a liar.
Originally posted by hooper
You're right - United Airlines has the material in storage - have you asked to see it yet? Have you contacted the FBI and the NTSB and requested information?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Once again, you are citing from a source that has ZERO credibility anymore (Pilots for 9/11 Truth). They've destroyed what little cache' they allegedly started out with by the outlandish mistakes of late.
The scene photos seem/quote]
There's your answer. You want that opinion. Well you got it. Its just your opinion. You've been shown all the photos. You want to believe that, I guess you will.
Its lame, but self-deception seems to work for you. Like the idea that the trees in Shanksville should have been dripping with blood.
Originally posted by hooper
Your constant state of denial is not my failure. That must have other sources.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
THAT is why there is a few minutes' discrepancy!!
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ProRipp
I guess the most curious thing to me is how conspiracy believers like to apply "common sense" to things like airplane crashes and building collapses. Exactly how many people are "commonly" confronted with these experinces wherein they can develop a common knowledge? How did you develop your baseline from which you were able to deduce that these things are extraordinary?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ProRipp
Probably because the aircraft in question miraculasly crashed into a small, isolated, natural earth depression which was already there before the event, according to google earth anyway.
MSM news footage showed smoke rising from the site but absolutely no fuselage, 6 tonne engines, landing gear, luggage, fags, booze or bodies. maybe it was all thrown into the back of chevvies before the cameras got there by locals wearing asbestos oven gloves.
Check around the internet, why do you think it is that there are many more sites calling foul than backing up the OS?
This is what a genuine "common sense" crash site normally looks like before it gets cleared:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/22b377f2a8c4.jpg[/atsimg]
PEACE,
RK
Originally posted by hooper
Wait - "absolutely no"? When did that happen? All the photos and video I saw showed debris
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Wait - "absolutely no"? When did that happen? All the photos and video I saw showed debris
Please list the photos and videos with proper sources showing the debris is from Flight 93.
Originally posted by hooper
You prove that is from something other than Flight 93.
Originally posted by hooper
All the evidence has been presented. It has also been accepted in a court of law as I've told you a thousand times.