It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by john124
reply to post by habfan1968
Without creation there is no science and science has yet to explain creation.
And neither has any religion any more so than for me to state a belief in fairies farting mushrooms that gave birth to humankind.
Science is at least looking for ways to explain origins of the universe as far back in time as our current technology allows & searching for more evidence of the standard model of particle physics. If you were to research the space-based telescopes NASA and ESA are launching in the next few years, we are expecting to answer many unanswered questions about the first half million years of the universe, and so origins of the universe. Do you expect similar discoveries to how exactly life first began on Earth to be answered overnight?
What work is religion doing to answer such questions? Nothing, as they've made up the answers and don't care whether they're right or wrong! Some religions still think the Earth is only exactly 6000 years old for christ's sake! Those people could have added some +/- error in that value to at least try and pretend that they are using some scientific method to determine their value. Never mind the constant flat out denial of all of the evidence of evolution.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by JaxonRoberts
'Watchmaker' analogy
Please explain. It probably does pertain.
Originally posted by 13579
reply to post by Max_TO
So if one believes that intelligent design is a possibility
Yet let me poin out "believes"
you equate intelligent design with a BEING.. yet it is not is it?
I can show you proof that it is not.. HUMANS.. yet i can show you the function of life
does not mean it is "INTELLIGENT" it just means you have nothing to equate the reason for it other than your own "intelliegnce"
that i find mind bending considering the state of the planet...
I'm not an atheist
Why are we here
Originally posted by 13579
reply to post by habfan1968
Seen the clip before and interesting as it may be, it is the survival instinct and the need of protection which motivates the octopus to use the coconut, not logic. If logic was to be used the octopus would have just left.
sorry... but if you was being SHOT AT or WAS ALONE what would you do logicaly?
PROTECT YOUR SELF FROM HARM
are you dens? or just think some how god made the universe just so your little ego can have a role to play?
i do petty you i do
and if god is real hes telling me to tell you
GET A GRIP
Originally posted by randyvs
Why do atheists spend so much time attacking something they dont believe?
I can see how it might be possible for someone to look around on earth and say there is
no God, I fail to conceive how anyone could look up into the heavens and
make the same claim.
[edit on 30-12-2009 by randyvs]
It's not about a lesson dude.
Originally posted by 13579
reply to post by heyo
Well it was actually the designer of humanity I was talking about.
yes so was i his name is god? or allah or heck knows?
if hes so smart why the EFFING HELL is life this way? oh wait i know its a lesson?
piss on my foot and tell me its raining please
thank yaw
You know how clouds always look like different things to different people.
With out God you cannot ever know the answer.
Originally posted by habfan1968
PROTECT YOUR SELF FROM HARM you do realize you have proved my point by using the exact terms I have used in layman, Protect yourself from harm is .......Survival, which is instinct.
Meanwhile, researchers at the University of Oxford found that New Caledonian crows can build and use several different tools to reach a treat. These birds have been observed in the wild using tools made from small twigs to pull grubs from hard-to-reach places.
here
Open Sesame Billye, a giant Pacific octopus, has a brain the size of a walnut. But she can solve puzzles she would never encounter in the wild, such as opening a glass jar to remove the fish inside. At right, (1) Billye is offered the jar. (2) She grasps the jar and, in (3) and (4), manipulates it into position and twists. (5) The top is released. Biologist Roland Anderson says he was not surprised that Billye could perform such a complex task. "Back in the '50s," he says, "Jacques Cousteau found that octopuses could open a corked bottle. He would put the cork in the bottle with a little hole in the top, and the octopus would reach inside and remove the cork."
Science is looking for the answer to an age old question that creationism has already answered, hey, if science produces an viable answer I am all ears but, in over 200 years of questioning we have not been able to answer the question other than, creationism.