British admit: Copenhagen intends genocide‚ World Government

reply to post by lpowell0627


It means to have less kids such that the birth rate is lower than the death rate.

If a genocidal event was to be attempted, we would not be hearing about it online and any article exposing such information would be censored. You really think the government is able to cover up other conspiracies including most of the truth behind 9/11 and Alien contact but somehow let this one slip? Nope. Think again.

Originally posted by np6888
As far as a one world government, if a one world government is necessary for our UFO friends to show, then so be it. .....I don't see what the problem is.

Maybe what you wish for are the pieces to their final solution.....

reply to post by GorehoundLarry


So, they cant get away with it you say ?
You are totally ignoring it, that is why they are getting away with it, people are so Numb in the coconut that they can do any thing they like, thats a fact..

[edit on 15/12/2009 by ChemBreather]

So, where's the document where the British admit to stemming population?

Or is it to be just an empty accusation and some non contextual links just thrown down and you expect the rest of us to scrub through it to find what?

an accusation from a tinfoil hat wearer who has exactly zero document that explicitly makes the statement you are claiming.

these are the WORST kinds of threads to have on here. speculation, conjecture and someone's fear thrown down as a reality.

unacceptable in my opinion. If you cannot provide something substantive, then I think you should sit in the corner for a time out.

Originally posted by mopusvindictus
I'd bet

That Killing the few Hundred people that believe in this sort of Evil nonsense would do allot more for the Globe than Killing the 5.5 Billion people who don't wish to rule the world ever would.

Just Sayin

"jumps up and down excited, slaps his knee and looks to the heavens with arms out stretched and 2 thumbs up"
Thank goodness I'm not alone! Just Sayin.. I couldnt agree more with any statement I've heard or read in years!
All this crap, and I do believe All of it....could end in just one well planned out day. There's something to be said for majority rules.

reply to post by TheAgentNineteen


You don't bring logic to a conspiracy site, friend. That's just asking for trouble.

Originally posted by ChemBreather
reply to post by GorehoundLarry

 

So, they cant get away with it you say ?
You are totally ignoring it, that is why they are getting away with it, people are so Numb in the coconut that they can do any thing they like, thats a fact..

[edit on 15/12/2009 by ChemBreather]

Uh, what? I'm not ignoring it. I'm simply wondering how something so tremendous can get leaked and not censored. I'm just not buying it, sorry.


If you want attention, all you have to do is throw the words "government" and "genocide" in the same sentence, now that's a fact.

Obviously I'm not ignoring anything about this, I'm just questioning the authenticity of this information. That's what we should ALL be doing instead of jumping to conclusions and being so gullible.

[edit on 15-12-2009 by GorehoundLarry]

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
I say we do some population genocide on the elite. less polution after and a better world to live in.

I had a dog when I was little. Beautiful little black dog named Fred.
At first I thought he was playing when he used to run in circles and chase his tail. Then he began to chew his tail and I got concerned and told my parents, they did nothing. Then he started eating his tail and his rear, once again the parents did nothing. He became crazed, and angry and you couldnt even approach him. Finally I got my father to pay attention and come see. Since so much time went by and so much damage was done and no attention was given, he was put down.
Such a shame that the beautiful dog I loved was consumed by worms and infection, such a terrible ending. The few worms ruined the entire animal. If only action was taken early, when I first noticed, the worms could have been killed, saving Fred.
(I was six)
The world needs worm medicine. Badly.

The World needs to be depopulated, I see the usual rubbing together of hands, of those who have a great idea of who should be chosen.

However I think you can stop the hand rubbing, we are not talking gas chambers here, or executions, they are talking about through natural means.

For instance, if the Pope would come forward and stop the ban on contraception, then huge families for the sake of following rules, would begin to become a thing of the past, in some places there are as many as 15 kids to a family, mostly because they are afraid of Gods wrath, because the Pope told them so.

That IMO would be the ideal place to start.

[edit on 15/12/2009 by azzllin]

Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
If a genocidal event was to be attempted, we would not be hearing about it online and any article exposing such information would be censored. You really think the government is able to cover up other conspiracies including most of the truth behind 9/11 and Alien contact but somehow let this one slip? Nope. Think again.

Sure you could see and read about it on line or in papers, why not? Its planned but hasnt happened, yet. As more and more people become aware and involved, the lines are going to blur, the secrecy will be more evident, that's going to be the nature of a planet of led beings, awakening.
And what I see happening now is, people who for so long "knew" something was amiss, something wasnt quite right, clamoring and defending "the old ways" the spoon fed ways. Someone comes along with a crack in the armour story and the spoon fed rush to debunk rather than roll up some sleeves and HELP investigate further.
It was novel and entertaining a little while back when there was an anchor (although false) that the order of the world was safe, the governments of the people were there to protect. Yet now that more and more is revealed, that more and more "unbelieveable bad news" is exposed about our governments, the safety net is gone, the anchor line CUT, and peoples subconscience kick in and argue against the alternative.
It cant be both ways. It cant be the united states of deception and then the united states of protection.
The collective facts speak for themselves, and more and more are lining up in a row to tell the story that needs told.
Its a mystery and conspiracy due to apathy.
But then you'll have that, because not everyones ready or able to handle whats coming.

Originally posted by np6888
reply to post by lpowell0627

 

It means to have less kids such that the birth rate is lower than the death rate.

Thanks for clarifying. But isn't that actually called population CONTROL?

Population control is the practice of artificially altering the rate of population growth.

Link: en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by Keymaster1


What else would you expect from the fact that the Socialist/Liberal/Progressive elites want to sequester atmospheric CO2, which will cause massive harvest failures, which will cause more starvation.

But the AGW proponents are too naive, and to ignorant for their own good, at least the regular people who have no knowledge whatsoever on this topic.

I said it before, and I'll say it again, this is the perfect way, among some others, for population control/depopulate the world, and most people are so ignorant that they are not only accepting this scam, but they are demanding immediate action to sequester atmospheric CO2...

But as i said before, perhaps the Socialist elites are right and we will be better off without the lot of them, at least those people with lesser IQs who are part of the AGW camp.

However, other innocent people will also suffer, and starve because of these measures. Those are the only people I feel sorry for whenever these globalist plans are implemented, but the AGW gang deserve everything they will get, sorry to say, because of these idiotic demands they have been making.




[edit on 15-12-2009 by ElectricUniverse]

For anyone interested, here is a pretty informative article regarding the need for population control:

As a consequence of this modern-day “Malthusian dilemma,” it seems reasonable to suggest that it is now time -- indeed, past time -- to think boldly about the midrange future, and to consider alternatives that go beyond merely slowing the growth, or even the stabilization, of global human numbers. In this brief essay, I shall argue that it has now become necessary for the human species to develop and implement, as quickly as possible, a well conceived, clearly articulated, flexibly designed, broadly equitable, and internationally coordinated program focused on bringing about a very significant reduction in global human numbers over the next two or more centuries. In simple quantitative terms, this effort will likely require a global population “shrinkage” of at least two-thirds to three-fourths, from a probable mid-to-late 21st century “peak” in the 9 to 10 billion range to a future (23rd century and beyond) “population optimum” of not more than 2 to 3 billion, or perhaps even fewer.

Link: culturechange.org...

The author of the article is Professor Ken Smail. Some information on him:

J. Kenneth Smail's varied academic background, while not unusual for an anthropologist trained in the 1950s and 1960s, gives new meaning to the phrase "death by degrees." He earned his A.B. in 1960 from DePauw University, with an "area major" in Zoology, Botany, and Geology. During his three-year high school teaching career in the early 1960s, he acquired the first of his three Master's degrees, an M.Ed. from the University of Pittsburgh (1961: Secondary Education). By that time, he had discovered Anthropology--the "one true discipline"--and proceeded to acquire an M.A. from Indiana University in 1965, focussing primarily on physical anthropology and archaeology.

Link: anthropology.kenyon.edu...

reply to post by Keymaster1
So if I understand you correctly, then since I had my Nuts clipped a few years ago so I wouldn't knock my wife up again,... I am a murderer??? I guess that also means that any man that chokes the chicken is also a murderer?. tell me that is not what you are saying. unholy crap batman,.. their gonna put me on death row...



[edit on 15-12-2009 by Lil Drummerboy]

[edit on 15-12-2009 by Lil Drummerboy]

reply to post by lpowell0627


He is not the only one my friend. Not too long ago I posted a paper which was made for the UN in 1991 by environlunatic professor Ignacy Sachs.

In this paper he calls for the implementation of a One World government, for the redistribution of wealth from developed countries to deveoping countries, which btw it appears that most people don't understand that this means they will take away the savings of the REGULAR people, the elites will continue being rich... He also calls for the dissolution of the middle classes around the world, meaning everyone will be equally poor which is what happens in true Socialism/Communism, and as i stated in the thread I started:

He states in this paper that the governments of the western world will most probably not accept this transfer of wealth, and dissolution of their sovereignty unless their hands are forced "by a popular movement or a catastrophe, such as another Great Depression or ecological disaster.“

How about if you cause all tree of them?... Cause a worldwide economic crisis, claim that there is an environmental problem that MUST BE SOLVED RIGHT NOW, and that if you don't do it THE WORLD WILL DIE, and make a "popular movements of the people backing immediate action to stop such an environmental problem, and economic prolem....Wouldn't that be better?.....

Here is the link to the thread I started about this paper.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

And here is part of the original article:

Published on 12-10-2009

By Jurriaan Maessen

“The governments of Europe, the United States, and Japan are unlikely to negotiate a social-democratic pattern of globalization – unless their hands are forced by a popular movement or a catastrophe, such as another Great Depression or ecological disaster“

Richard Sandbrook, Closing the Circle: Democratization and Development in Africa, Zed Books limited, London, 2000.

A 1991 policy paper prepared for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) by self-described ‘ecosocioeconomist’ professor Ignacy Sachs outlines a strategy for the transfer of wealth in name of the environment to be implemented in the course of 35 to 40 years. As it turns out, it is a visionary paper describing phase by phase the road to world dictatorship. As the professor states in the paper:

“To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades. Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the time-span.“

In his paper “The Next 40 Years: Transition Strategies to the Virtuous Green Path: North/South/East/Global“, Sachs accurately describes not only the intended time-span to bring about a global society, but also what steps should be taken to ensure “population stabilization”:

“In order to stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics, mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved fairly inefficient.“

In the first part of the (in retrospect) bizarrely accurate description of the years to come, Sachs points out redistribution of wealth is the only viable path towards population stabilization and- as he calls it- a “virtuous green world”. The professor:

“The way out from the double bind of poverty and environmental disruption calls for a fairly long period of more economic growth to sustain the transition strategies towards the virtuous green path of what has been called in Stockholm ecodevelopement and has since changed its name in Anglo-Saxon countries to sustainable development.”

“(…) a fair degree of agreement seems to exist, therefore, about the ideal development path to be followed so long as we do not manage to stabilize the world population and, at the same time, sharply reduce the inequalities prevailing today.”

“The bolder the steps taken in the near future”, Sachs asserts, “the shorter will be the time span that separates us from a steady state. Radical solutions must address to the roots of the problem and not to its symptoms. Theoretically, the transition could be made shorter by measures of redistribution of assets and income.”

Sachs points to the political difficulties of such proposals being implemented (because free humanity tends to distrust any national government let alone transnational government to redistribute its well-earned wealth). He therefore proposes these measures to be implemented gradually, following a meticulously planned strategy:

“The pragmatic prospect is one of transition extending itself over several decades.”

In the second sub-chapter “The Five Dimensions of Ecodevelopment”, professor Sachs sums up the main dimensions of this carefully outlined move to make Agenda 21 a very real future prospect. The first dimension he touches upon is “Social Sustainability“:

“The aim is to build a civilization of being within greater equity in asset and income distribution, so as to improve substantially the entitlements of the broad masses of population and of reduce the gap in standards of living between the have and the have nots.”

This of course means, reducing the standards of living in “The North” (U.S., Europe) and upgrading those of the developing nations (”The South and The East”). This would have to be realized through what Sachs calls “Economic Sustainability“: “made possible by a more efficient allocation and management of resources and a steady flow of public and private investment.”

The third dimension described by the professor is “Ecological Sustainability” which, among other things, limits “the consumption of fossile fuels and other easily depletable or environmentally harmful products, substituting them by renewable and/or plentiful and environmentally friendly resources, reducing the volume of pollutants by means of energy and resource conservation and recycling and, last but not least, promoting self-constraint in material consumption on part of the rich countries and of the privileged social strata all over the world;”

In order to make this happen Sachs stresses the need of “defining the rules for adequate environmental protection, designing the institutional machinery and choosing the mix of economic, legal and administrative instruments necessary for the implementation of environmental policies.”
........

blacklistednews.com...

reply to post by rickyrrr

Here's your proof, couldn't have said it better, though I will add " Every time you have intercourse with a Women without the express purpose of reproduction, You are commiting an act of Deception, therefore she knows now that she is being USED for your own twisted sense of PLEASURE! It then causes her to become depressed and she may even become suicidal or at least HATE you/herself for abusing her, disrespecting her, and most likely will Divorce you and then find herself on the road to self-abuse by trying to find a decect MAN that won't USE her, in which she will realize that Modern Males have no Honor and she will be DOOMED to purgatory for letting you Pummel her without any true love, then she will either eat herself to death, or take drugs to try to forget what you've done to her, or just kill herself outright!

Hence, you have MURDERED HER!

Get some Morals, Dude! (you noticed I didn'y refer to you as a MAN, cause you're NOT!)


www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by InSpiteOf


There are approximately 11,000 extended families with approx. 1-3 million Individuals that control 95% of Global Commerce. (from memory, read I believe in Noam Chomsky's Book 'Manufacturing Consent'.)

That leaves room for 497,000,000 Peons to do the Work for them!

Originally posted by azzllin
.........
However I think you can stop the hand rubbing, we are not talking gas chambers here, or executions, they are talking about through natural means.
.........

Are you part of the rich elite?... Did you even bother to read what the environlunatics are saying?...

BTW, sequestering atmospheric CO2 for depopulation is not "a natural mean".... It is a way to stare most of the world to death meanwhile people like you keep siding with the lunatic, egomaniacs who want to murder most of the world...

But keep siding with them, you are one of those people they want to get rid off.



[edit on 15-12-2009 by ElectricUniverse]

Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by Signals

 

A stone tablet no one has claimed credit for or proved it's origins. Yup complete proof.

WHY THE HELL IS IT THERE THOUGH? and why does it match what papers have said is an ideal population?