It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jukiodone2
Im actually shocked by how many people refuse to accept what little verified evidence we have on this.
Give me one piece of evidence that is as strong as the intercepted warning of a rocket launch at the exact time and then we have a discussion , until then we have 17 pages of people listing their "wishes" of what they'd like it to be with absolutely no evidence.
People who dont think it's a rocket need to stop asking for evidence of a rocket launch ( please see red circle photo showing tell tale rocket launch and intercepted launch info) and start providing something of substance themselves.
There must be 50000 scientists and engineers out there who understand rockets, metreology and weapons testing inside out and not one of them has said this could be anything else....
ahhh I forgot they're all under the controll of a shadowy organisation seeking to hide the truth about our ability to create wormholes from the LHC to facilitate stargates for ET...
Originally posted by jukiodone2
Im actually shocked by how many people refuse to accept what little verified evidence we have on this.
Give me one piece of evidence that is as strong as the intercepted warning of a rocket launch at the exact time and then we have a discussion , until then we have 17 pages of people listing their "wishes" of what they'd like it to be with absolutely no evidence.
People who dont think it's a rocket need to stop asking for evidence of a rocket launch ( please see red circle photo showing tell tale rocket launch and intercepted launch info) and start providing something of substance themselves.
There must be 50000 scientists and engineers out there who understand rockets, metreology and weapons testing inside out and not one of them has said this could be anything else....
ahhh I forgot they're all under the controll of a shadowy organisation seeking to hide the truth about our ability to create wormholes from the LHC to facilitate stargates for ET...
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Jeez, you go to bed for 8 hours and miss out on all the fun.
Im glad it turned out to be a rocket launch which I said back on page three, thanks to the guys at atmospheric optics. Certainly an unbelievable image, good to see its been debunked.
Originally posted by Hack28
Originally posted by TheOneElectric
Anyone remember that other video from Florida taken in 1992 where the sky was littered with odd colored lights and colored dust changing shapes constantly?
That was called a rocket test, and this one is being called one too. I am not buying it anymore.
Isnt it funny how 99% of the poeple on here dont trust anyone higher than their pay grade, yet as soon as they hear someone with a title say "we test fired a rocket" they will believe it to be the gospel of god.
Im sorry but Okums Razors suggest the simpliest theory is usually the correct one, but this doesnt sound like the simpliest explanation:
A russian rocket with a newly invented propolsion system failed, spun out of control and failed in a perfectly shaped spiral (read chaos theory) that lasted for multiple minutes, then reacted with something in the earths atmosphere so as to create a bubble, and no rocket was located or confirmed to have been fired?
Doesnt seem like the simpliest IMHO, seems like the most logical perhaps in our understandiong of the universe but simplest?
Originally posted by wigit
I'm surprised no-one's been warned to close windows or stay indoors if they live underneath or downwind from that stuff. The sky looks kinda oily in the last of the photos. God knows what's in it.
Originally posted by aboveGoos
reply to post by nataylor
That is probably the most convincing similarities with rockets and this, if it wouldn't be made privately by someone unknown with a very vague description. Still, if it's backed up by real footage, I'll accept that it might be a rocket. Can't refute evidence, right?