It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That's not what I said, or at least that's not what I thought I was saying when I wrote it, what I meant is that I am not more interested in any particular photo when compared with the other photos you posted.
Originally posted by mixmix
So you are not interested like many ATS users by latest moon pictures from LRO ?
Old pictures, hairy or hairless, are also interesting, that's why I am also downloading the Clementine photos, the Apollo photos (although I only download the 2GB Apollo metric photos when I need to see more detail, like on those "sickle" photos, and delete the 2GB file after converting it to PNG) and the Lunar Orbiter photos.
Just old hairy pictures.
Maybe, but I like rocks.
Just rocks.
Maybe, but I like rocks.
PS: I can post some things I thought interesting in some LRO photos that I have posted on another thread.
Sure, everything is important to get the best idea of the conditions in which the photo was taken, but I don't see any reference to sun angle, for example, on the pre-release images or on the associated documentation.
Quite fascinationg this one - reminded me of something...
What do you think?!
Originally posted by mixmix
Maybe, but I like rocks.
PS: I can post some things I thought interesting in some LRO photos that I have posted on another thread.
me too I like rocks
but shape matter's.
not just picture ID.
long, latt, resolution, sun angle.
height of rocks, length of shadows.
a bigger view of the sherrif star crater
unmodified
ATS posters, use your own brigthness and contrast settings.
[snip]
from LRO M102781689LE.IMG line 11
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by ArMaP
Awesome stuff mate. Thanks!
Can you explain how in a few of the rolling rock images they seem to roll in and out of craters?!
And what, pray tell, are you implying can be seen?