It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AllSeeingI
reply to post by OzWeatherman
As what? Janitor? Boss? Raindancer? Be more specific... Just because you work for such a group does not mean you are an expert in the field. Could just be a mailroom worker or assistant. If you get my drift.
Title? Credentials?
now replace 'planet' with 'god',
You had not answered them. You did not state it was opinion. You did not state your reason for your opinion.
BTW...when there are MILLIONS of hybrids releasing tons, and tons of water vapor which is 95% to 98% WORSE than CO2 as a ghg, are you going to be screaming to the top of your lungs once again?...
Originally posted by john124
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by john124
Already answered those questions ages ago.
It's plausible that some of the emails have been doctored. Enjoy trying to fit emails as "evidence" around your conspiracy - you won't get very far!
It is also possible that you are nothing more than a mindless zombie who the aliens brainwashed for their evil plan to take over the world.... Good luck proving otherwise....
As I said - you haven't got very far, and you never will with that kind of attitude. I've seen you post so many comments on ATS about this issue, much more than the average user such as myself, and almost every post is an attack on climate science or denials! When do you get the time to actually study the science of global warming?!
Do you prefer to fantasise over people's personal emails, rather than be a scientist? as you pretend to know-it-all!
[edit on 26-11-2009 by john124]
Originally posted by john124
I had already answered the questions to the extent I saw to be necessary in giving my opinion. You only state that I didn't, because you don't like the answer.
I'm not making any wild claims, yet you persist with this nonsense - all because of a difference of opinion.
from this thread
Originally posted by john124
It's pretty obvious that a lot of comments have been added to the hacked emails
Already answered those questions ages ago.
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
AHHH YES...the "grow up tactic." That gets used alot by people pretending to be "Above" a situation that they are themselves...participating in. Need I say more???
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
My work email has been going crazy with this stuff, which was prior to this being posted on ATS. Now New Zealands data has come under scrutiny, and I suspect my organisations climate research centre may also come under review. (I hope we arent involved though)
BTW, for those that dont know, I work for the Australian Bureau of Meteorology
Originally posted by john124
Erm... NO!
Human's ARE treating planet Earth as though it can be easily replaceable. I'm not talking of an invisible entity.
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
You do know that PHYTOPLANKTON provides most of the earth's oxygen...RIGHT???) to counterbalance the excessive CARBON MONOXIDE content due to EMISSIONS, then there is an inherent PROBLEM to how the earth's heating, or cooling system will respond.
source
the average atmospheric lifetime of carbon monoxide can be calculated to be about 2 months, with a range between 1 and 4 months, which reflects the uncertainty in the annual emissions of carbon monoxide
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More recent reports of carbon monoxide measurements in air samples show that from 1988 to 1993, global carbon monoxide concentrations started to decline rapidly. Novelli et al. (1994) collected air samples from 27 locations between 71 °N and 41 °S about once every 3 weeks from a ship during the period June 1990 to June 1993. In the northern latitudes, carbon monoxide concentrations decreased at a spatially and temporally average rate of 8.4 ± 1.0 µg/m3 (7.3 ± 0.9 ppb) per year (6.1% per year). In the southern latitudes, carbon monoxide concentrations decreased at a rate of 4.8 ± 0.6 µg/m3 (4.2 ± 0.5 ppb) per year (7.0% per year). Khalil & Rasmussen (1994) reported a slightly smaller decline in global carbon monoxide concentrations of 2.6 ± 0.8% per year during the period from 1988 to 1992. The rate of decrease reported by Khalil & Rasmussen (1994) was particularly rapid in the southern hemisphere. The authors hypothesize that this decline may reflect a reduction in tropical biomass burning.
Since 1993, the downward trend in global carbon monoxide concentrations has levelled off, and it is not clear if carbon monoxide will continue to decline or increase
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
According to the study that you provided, there was a 50% decrease in the phytoplankton's ability to photosynthesize after the introduction of oil into the environment. Could you image a 50% decrease of the world's supply of oxygen and what would actually occur as a result?