It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cabaret Voltaire
Change your diet. Eat dog food.
My little pug drops nice hard nuggets and never wipes. She just pinches them off clean.
I suspect your mooshy smears are all diet related.
I can't believe anybody actually lived before toilet paper. I mean what did they use? Corn cobs are a joke, right? Leaves? Did people go gather leaves to poop? This is actually a horrifying topic to consider, and I am very happy that toilet paper exists. How can you NOT have toilet paper?!! Wipe with a wash cloth? That is gross. Your hand?! That is disgusting. No wonder there is so much disease in other countries.
My toilet paper country is nice and clean.
Thank you.
Originally posted by RestingInPieces
Originally posted by heyo
I know what you mean. I thought about this years ago and haven't wiped my ass since.
Well I used to, but there is no longer a "paper or plastic" option, and newspapers stain.
I have a bidet, and then get in the shower and use soap and water afterward.
It's actually pretty disgusting to leave a layer of feces on your... skin and butt hair, isn't it? It's like you are walking around with a few small chunks and a thin layer.
How much of the bacteria and fecal matter can you really get rid of with paper?
Originally posted by RestingInPieces
Originally posted by mrsoul2009
Originally posted by RestingInPieces
Originally posted by The Parallelogram
This thread contains no evidence. Not even an ATTEMPT at providing any.
why the hell is it at the top of the ATS page? WHY?
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because there is no evidence because nobody has even bothered to look doesn't mean there is no evidence at all.
Frankly, I'm surprised at the ignorance and juvenile responses to this important issue.
Forgive me, but I thought that the implications were so OBVIOUS that evidence need not be directly provided. After all, I don't try to provide evidence that salad is green when I'm discussing the mastication of it.
Then again, I only say this because I've come to terms with the dangers of toilet paper, no matter how silly it may seem to the programmed masses who can't think of any other way to clean themselves.
Since you appear too LAZY and to find evidence (which should be entirely obvious, I'll do a 2 minute search... something you are obviously incapable of)
Recycled paper needs to be deinked before it is pulped and processed. This deinking process may involve chlorine to bleach the paper. Chlorine based chemicals can react with paper fibers to create toxic compounds such as dioxin and organochlorines.
Dioxins cause cancer, learning disorders, decreased immune response, diabetes and all sorts of other nasty problems in the environment. By the way, the same chlorine issue is prevalent when using virgin-fiber based toilet tissue too.
www.greenlivingtips.com...
Here is a link to a 65 page report entitled "Survey of Chemical Substances
in Paper Handkerchiefs and Toilet Paper". I think you'll be very surprised at the number of chemicals used to manufacture toilet paper and those same chemicals that remain in the tissue.
www.mst.dk...
A quick example:
hydroxybiphenyl
This substance is often used as a biocide
The substance is on the EU list of hazardous substances under the
classification Xi; R36/37/38. The substance must be labelled with N; R50
(dangerous for the environment/very toxic to aquatic organisms).
Believe me, TP is more dangerous than your now ignorant mind knows.
Sorry sir, but the Carl Sagan statement you quote was not meant to justify or prove theories that have little or no evidence. Yes these chemicals are produced in the production of paper but there is no evidence that harmful amounts exist in the finished product. The title of your post is not only irresponsible, its flat out wrong.
Perhaps another Sagan quote is more appropriate here:
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
There is plenty of evidence that the chemicals are still in the tissue afterward.
For example, I provided a 65 page survey by the Danish EPA which shows this to be true; You obviously are ignoring it (like you are ignoring intelligence and reason).
It describes the chemicals found in off the shelf tissue products.
you can continue to play stupid if you want by ignoring the evidence... just let it be known that there are a myriad of harmful chemicals in the tissue that you apply to your backside.
[/quote
Sorry I'm not buying nor ignoring anything. The Danish paper is interesting - however its only one study. Has it been peer reviewed? If so, please provide the links. Regardless, this paper doesn't prove anything. least of all that Toilet paper kills" - which is over the top hyperbole and as I said. irresponsible.
I am a true believer in science and its methods - but the methods shouldn't allow for such conclusions to be drawn before the evidence is all in and tested. Anything other than that is just being lazy and sensational.
Originally posted by RestingInPieces
Originally posted by The Parallelogram
This thread contains no evidence. Not even an ATTEMPT at providing any.
why the hell is it at the top of the ATS page? WHY?
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because there is no evidence because nobody has even bothered to look doesn't mean there is no evidence at all.
Frankly, I'm surprised at the ignorance and juvenile responses to this important issue.
Forgive me, but I thought that the implications were so OBVIOUS that evidence need not be directly provided. After all, I don't try to provide evidence that salad is green when I'm discussing the mastication of it.
Then again, I only say this because I've come to terms with the dangers of toilet paper, no matter how silly it may seem to the programmed masses who can't think of any other way to clean themselves.
Since you appear too LAZY and to find evidence (which should be entirely obvious, I'll do a 2 minute search... something you are obviously incapable of)
Recycled paper needs to be deinked before it is pulped and processed. This deinking process may involve chlorine to bleach the paper. Chlorine based chemicals can react with paper fibers to create toxic compounds such as dioxin and organochlorines.
Dioxins cause cancer, learning disorders, decreased immune response, diabetes and all sorts of other nasty problems in the environment. By the way, the same chlorine issue is prevalent when using virgin-fiber based toilet tissue too.
www.greenlivingtips.com...
Here is a link to a 65 page report entitled "Survey of Chemical Substances
in Paper Handkerchiefs and Toilet Paper". I think you'll be very surprised at the number of chemicals used to manufacture toilet paper and those same chemicals that remain in the tissue.
www.mst.dk...
A quick example:
hydroxybiphenyl
This substance is often used as a biocide
The substance is on the EU list of hazardous substances under the
classification Xi; R36/37/38. The substance must be labelled with N; R50
(dangerous for the environment/very toxic to aquatic organisms).
Believe me, TP is more dangerous than your now ignorant mind knows.
so in the course of one post i'm ignorant, juvenile, lazy, and obviously incapable of operating the Internet. and then ignorant again.
you really don't like it when people ask you to prove your claims, do you?
please, tell me how you know i'm ignorant (twice!), juvenile, lazy, and obviously incapable of operating the Internet.
in my two-line original post, what did I say that proved any of these things?
aren't you being a little more juvenile than i am, really? look at this objectively, now. i'd hate to have to call you names.
Originally posted by The Parallelogram
so in the course of one post i'm ignorant, juvenile, lazy, and obviously incapable of operating the Internet. and then ignorant again.
you really don't like it when people ask you to prove your claims, do you?
please, tell me how you know i'm ignorant (twice!), juvenile, lazy, and obviously incapable of operating the Internet.
in my two-line original post, what did I say that proved any of these things?
aren't you being a little more juvenile than i am, really? look at this objectively, now. i'd hate to have to call you names.
Originally posted by thewarhead
ridiculous idea
"use normal then to wipe your ass. but then youll get paranoid about the ink in the paper.. maybe you smoke a bit too much"
Originally posted by nepafogo
Are we that hard up for a topic that we post this? And it is on the front page? What is wrong with people that S&F this post. Ridiculous to the max. Sorry. Thumbs down!