It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Incorrect -- there is also a neutrino.
No it does not, because the "stable frequency" is just an alias for stability and in no way explains anything related to physics of COMPLEX OBJECTS which are protons and neutrons.
Again, why does pi0 decay to two gammas, while charged pions of almost identical mass decay very differently?
I know it's moot, to list a question after question, because answers aren't coming. To keep saying "this is a fundamental frequency" is like saying "because it's like asparagus".
Originally posted by TheRedneck
What proof do you have that a nucleon (or any hadron) is a complex object?
Consider for a moment what would happen if my concept in the OP is correct: gravity is the flow of the continuum as it is drawn into matter from antimatter arranged at the edge of the Universe. That means that there would be an overall current of continuum that would be more pronounced where more matter is accumulated, as in the center of a galaxy.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
This force increases proportionally to a function of its distance. In other words, the farther one particle gets from another, the stronger the force holding them together becomes. It gets stranger, however, since this 'strong force' also suddenly drops off to zero after a certain distance. No force has ever been observed that follows this relationship with distance.
Are you describing a bow shock? Like the force of water against a rock in a river, the larger the rock the greater the force. Upstream the force is great (bow shock) and downstream there is an equal and opposite reaction (eddy). If I understand this correctly then this explains gravity as a pushing force and I don't think proof has been made for or against this idea. It shouldn't be too difficult to prove gravity as either a pushing or pulling force by the way.
In the manner which you explained would this then be described as a fictitious force or the reaction to an acceleration? Except that this is backwards, the force is inversely proportional by the square of its distance towards the center?
matter is integral to the continuum, any motion of that continuum would not present itself to an observer in the immediate area.
We can also find examples of bow shock in the magnetic fields around planets, stars and even galaxies. This is medium equilibrium and is evidence for a medium in space that is something other that light in either a particle or wave form.
I see similarities in the two concepts you present yet your idea of the continuum being separated I find difficult to accept. The way I understand it is that everything is connected to this continuum which acts like a single place and we are all connected to this one place.
High red shift values from QSOs show that our time is dilated compared to these objects, time around a Quasar is moving much faster then ours since we are actually accelerating at a much faster rate (gravity pressure and rate of rotation).
High red shift values from QSOs show that our time is dilated compared to these objects, time around a Quasar is moving much faster then ours since we are actually accelerating at a much faster rate (gravity pressure and rate of rotation).
Please forgive my ignorance, but I have not heard of such observations being made. Can you locate some links to this? I would love to investigate!
Originally posted by TheRedneck
High red shift values from QSOs show that our time is dilated compared to these objects, time around a Quasar is moving much faster then ours since we are actually accelerating at a much faster rate (gravity pressure and rate of rotation).
Please forgive my ignorance, but I have not heard of such observations being made. Can you locate some links to this? I would love to investigate!
TheRedneck
Originally posted by TheRedneck
This force increases proportionally to a function of its distance. In other words, the farther one particle gets from another, the stronger the force holding them together becomes. It gets stranger, however, since this 'strong force' also suddenly drops off to zero after a certain distance. No force has ever been observed that follows this relationship with distance.