It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ecoparity
reply to post by Libertygal
Here is the EU briefing document which contains the real details: PDF Download
The Baxter incident begins on pg 11 of the presentation.
It was not a vaccine, it was a virus used to test a vaccine that had been given to the ferrets.
The virus was not contagious to humans, only ferrets died.
This had nothing to do with vaccine production. This was first round testing where the virus used for testing is mixed by hand and labeled by hand. It's a common mistake.
Mike's interview with one of the top Health officials in the country at that time will confirm this was not a big deal and is not what it's been made out to be, at all.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Can anyone come up with a GOOD reason that the WHO will not release detailed info on the current genetic makeup of the virus obtained from Ukraine?
Originally posted by ecoparity
reply to post by nikiano
Where are you getting phase two clinical trial from? This was phase one, animal testing and very early phase one at that. There is no mention anywhere in the document about a phase 2 clinical trial.
If we're being honest here I seriously doubt your proclaimed expertise and based on what you are willing to believe agree completely with your decision to get out of health care if that is really your profession.
[edit on 17-11-2009 by ecoparity]
Originally posted by JJay55
Ok. Can we get to a concensus yet?
Bad guys:
WHO
UN
Baxter
Victims:
Ukraine
Poland
test animals
Good guys:
us
Moshe
Now who at WHO is personally responsible? UN? Baxter?
Originally posted by Kailassa
My information is that the 72 kg of contaminated material was for use as a basis for the next batch of vaccines, and the testing on ferrets was purely the idea of a researcher who was given a private warning.
That would explain why none of the other 3 laboratories this material was sent out to even began testing it on animals.
The Czech ag authorities reported an outbreak of low pathogenic avian influenza (H5N3) in a holding with mallard ducks for restocking of game in Jihoceský. From 40 cloacal swabs taken in the frame of regular monitoring, one sample appeared positive. Clinical signs were absent. All 280 susceptible birds were destroyed. H5 and H7 avian influenza in its low pathogenic form in poultry is a notifiable disease.
Sorry, I didn't respond because I can only argue, and I didn't see anything to disagree with, Except maybe that (or so I have read here) Moshe doesn't even exist!
Originally posted by JJay55
Ok. Can we get to a concensus yet?
Bad guys:
WHO
UN
Baxter
Victims:
Ukraine
Poland
test animals
Good guys:
us
Moshe
Now who at WHO is personally responsible? UN? Baxter?
Originally posted by Cloudsinthesky
reply to post by JJay55
I am all eyes now........Where do I sign up for the red pill.......
Since your so hot.........you get a free pass on presenting documentation and referenses
Originally posted by butcherguy
Sorry, I didn't respond because I can only argue, and I didn't see anything to disagree with, Except maybe that (or so I have read here) Moshe doesn't even exist!
Originally posted by apacheman
Don't know if this has been posted yet or not. It seems a fair summary of what is known and suspected so far, with a reasonable projection of fatalities, a starting place for further discussion...
www.infowars.com...
One thing I've been picking up that may explain what's happening is this:
hisz.rsoe.hu...〈=eng
Hope JustMike isn't coming down with that. On another note, talk about a crappy job, swabbing a duck's cloaca.
The Czech ag authorities reported an outbreak of low pathogenic avian influenza (H5N3) in a holding with mallard ducks for restocking of game in Jihoceský.
I really hope I'm wrong though. I really think I'd rather deal with an engineered virus than a reassortment with avian flu.
Originally posted by Chevalerous
Originally posted by Kailassa
My information is that the 72 kg of contaminated material was for use as a basis for the next batch of vaccines, and the testing on ferrets was purely the idea of a researcher who was given a private warning.
That would explain why none of the other 3 laboratories this material was sent out to even began testing it on animals.
Yes you are right about this!
The 72kg of contaminated material was meant for vaccine production by sub-contractors to Baxter Europe.
Whatever report that is circulating now even inside of EU is a part of the cleaning up and cover up of this event!
[edit on 17-11-2009 by Chevalerous]
Originally posted by martin3030
The reports continue to appear to be very contradictory.
Heres one from yesterday which says that a Ukraine Emergency Physician states that this is NOT the N1N1 virus ????
www.examiner.com... flu-or-something-else
Additionally there are some very valid questions that need answers following the WHO statements,posed here;
www.examiner.com... ding-to-WHO-analysis
[edit on 17-11-2009 by martin3030]