It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by drew hempel
If C to G is 2:3 and G to C is 3:4 then we can see that 2:3 x 2 is 4:3 which when inverted is 3:4 (and 3:4 x 2:3 = 1:2 the octave). So far so good. And 2:3 x 4:3 is 8:9 as the major 2nd interval or 2:3 squared is 9:4 which is divided by 2 as the major 2nd interval 9:8. But 9:8 is not the same as 8:9 yet 9:8 cubed is the tritone (the square root of two) -- to equally divide the Perfect 4th and Perfect 5th.
In other words using the undertone harmonic of 4:3 goes against the overtone harmonic of 3:4.
en.wikipedia.org...(music)
The root of a perfect fourth, then, is its top note because it is an octave of the fundamental in the hypothetical harmonic series.
Originally posted by hawk123
Hopefully you now understand the Double Headed Eagle
Originally posted by drew hempel
The actual frequency of the "symbol" is arbitrary based on the scale used -- so if you use "C" as the starting frequency, with Pythagorean "divide and average" harmonics -- then you get a different frequency for "F" then the other way around. If you use "F" as the root tone for the scale then you get a different frequency for "C."
www.jessedeanefreeman.com...
For review of Pythagorean harmonics and changing the root tone frequency.
This is completely understand. But there is a DEEPER POINT -- not only can you not "change" keys of the scale in "divide and average" harmonics BUT ALSO AT THE 12th harmonic there is an EXPANSION of the frequency -- so the frequency is not the same. This means that "F" is not the same frequency when it is divide and averaged -- the octave does not have double the value.
Big snip
Greek miracle etc
Originally posted by CHiram_Abiff
Originally posted by hawk123
Hopefully you now understand the Double Headed Eagle
That is much reading on those sites...
(too much paranoid bible babbling and ranting actually)
Did Manly P. Hall understand the double eagle?
How many folks really do?
Because everybody traces much of the symbolism back to the Egyptian mysteries, and that could not be the source...because Marija Gimbutas' work was not completed until the late 20th century, after Manly P. Hall and Pike, and many others were dead...
Maybe Hawk can give me his summation of the double-headed EAGLE...you obviously have done some research...
>>double headed eagle = illuminati = Lucifer bad?
is that it simple?
namaste
[edit on 31-1-2010 by CHiram_Abiff]
Originally posted by Bagatell
Originally posted by drew hempel
The actual frequency of the "symbol" is arbitrary based on the scale used -- so if you use "C" as the starting frequency, with Pythagorean "divide and average" harmonics -- then you get a different frequency for "F" then the other way around. If you use "F" as the root tone for the scale then you get a different frequency for "C."
www.jessedeanefreeman.com...
For review of Pythagorean harmonics and changing the root tone frequency.
OK we agree on that.
This is completely understand. But there is a DEEPER POINT -- not only can you not "change" keys of the scale in "divide and average" harmonics BUT ALSO AT THE 12th harmonic there is an EXPANSION of the frequency -- so the frequency is not the same. This means that "F" is not the same frequency when it is divide and averaged -- the octave does not have double the value.
It appears to me that we are approaching this from different perspectives i.e musical (musickal?) and mathematical. I agree with everything you say above. However if you recognise F as the authentic Do of the chromatic scale then you don't need to change keys. The fact that everything changes at the twelfth harmonic dosn't worry me too much. My hearing isn't that acute. The fact that the octave is a comma short also doesn't worry me too much other than it makes my Strat less than optimal.
Big snip
Greek miracle etc
Sounds similar to John Harrisons thinking on temperament. Which for me squares the circle because it was him advocating tuning to C=256hz (the cube root of 2) which apparently produces a cymatic point within a circle, which brought me to this thread.
But does any of this tell us to what frequency we should tune our authentic DO?
without a doubt, thank you for contributing, my 'real' life has been so hectic lately I've not had time to be online much let alone continuing my research.
originally posted by drew hempel
Very fascinating research.
But it's not accurate in terms of real alchemical Pythagorean resonance -- which is also the same as Taoist alchemy and goes back to the Dravidian tantra practice and originated with the Bushmen trance dance healing tradition
If you want to actually practice Pythagorean philosophy the best bet is to use the "small universe" exercise -- which as the music scale applied to the outer body -- you LISTEN to the 12 notes as the energy nodes along the outside of the body. springforestqigong.com... has great c.d.s to practice the small universe. As you practice this scale then the sound resonates as ultrasound which then ionizes your electrochemical energy -- the emotional energy -- which then ionizes further into electromagnetic energy -- and then finally the middle of the brain gets permanently magnetized.
During this training of REAL Pythagorean harmonics you get telekinesis, telepathy, precognition and healing abilities and you can go without food and water. I went 8 days on half a glass of water but I was never hungry and my energy kept increasing.
The final teaching is that external reality is a projection of our internal chakras so that the universe is a holograph which we exist within. This is called the "rainbow body" or the "Rainbow vortex of reality" or '___' hyperspace -- but it's created FROM the abstract process of the complementary opposite harmonics ratios as the eternal spacetime transformation or formless consciousness.
originally posted by CHiram_Abiff
But we all know that the MAIN SIGNIFICANCE of the pentagram is that within its architecture we find the GOLDEN RATIO
originally posted by Drew hempel
There is no beginning nor ending to "sound" -- it's an eternal resonance with no one listening!
As math professor Steve Strogatz points out fractals (synchronized chaos) are based on Platonic mathematics -- they are ideals NOT FOUND IN NATURE.
originally posted by CHiram_Abiff Funny that it can be transferred again in your famous number.
Originally posted by drew hempel
Hertz is another example of frequency -- Hertz defines time as spatial distance by using the commutative property. Second was defined by Galileo by time over distance.
So in Pythagorean harmonics you IGNORE HERTZ AND FREQUENCY and you just go by the complementary opposite harmonics of the 1-4-5 as an INFINITE SPIRAL OF FIFTHS.
You LISTEN to this infinite process of frequency through the 1-4-5 ratios -- it can not be measured visually because it violates symmetry and all Western math relies on symmetry.
So we can then logically infer that there is no source for sound -- it's infinite.
originally posted by hawk123
Unfortunately I do not know the answer, since I first need to make the connection with planets.
originally posted by drew hempel You can read the book "Taoist Yoga: Alchemy and Immortality" translated by Charles Luk for the details on the small universe exercise. You can also get a c.d. to practice it as real Pythagorean harmonics from springforestqigong.com... -- Level 1 sitting meditation c.d.
O.K. you can use "divide and average" math which was converted to logarithms as the Greek Miracle -- but it is based on "deep disharmony" with an escalating diminishing rate of return for technology -- the destructive effects increase. This, again, is from the "divide and average" music harmonics:
nonduality.com... gives further details.
Again because G x C does not equal C x G.
The list of artists who explored demonic forces is a long one and includes, in composers, Mozart, Beethoven, Berlioz, Gounod, Tchaikovsky, Boito, Liszt, Wagner and, finally, Scriabin who, in his last tone poem "Prometheus: Poem of Fire" Op. 60, made the linkage between Prometheus and Lucifer explicit.
The Sumerians, the people of the land of Sumer, are sometimes called the ‘sudden civilization’, and for good reason. They suddenly spawned around 4000BC in between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, Mesopotamia. Many Biblical scholars claim this area to be the Biblical site of the ‘Garden of ED.EN’; it is regarded as the Cradle of Civilization.
It’s interesting that a lot of Origins ‘myths’ talk about lands covered with water, leaves a lot for speculation, but that is for another time. The Sumerians referred to themselves as ùĝ saĝ gígpe which translates to ‘the big-headed people’.
if not depicting what they actually are (being ‘big-headed’) could only be describing what they want to be OR what they are in some way connected to. Ancient Sumerian mythology carries vivid tales of wars between men and God’s, interaction between men and God’s and the transferring of knowledge between men and God’s.
The deities of the Sumerian people were called Annunaki (sometimes Ananaki). Annunaki were ‘those of royal blood’ as they were the children of Heaven (Anu) and (Na) Earth (Ki).
Anu was the prime God, the God of heaven, the God of god’s. Anu was one of the first Sumerian God’s, along with Enki and Enlil.
Enki was the God of water, but more importantly he was considered the God knowledge and wisdom as it was Enki who travelled to Earth and taught man. Enki means lord (En) of Earth (Ki). Enki’s sacred number was the number 40 (the number of death), further, Enki is regarded by some as the snake (devil) in the Garden of ED.EN in Genesis. The demonization of Enki is evident.
In the Epic, the God Marduk is the son of Enki, the ‘lord’ God of ancient Babylon. The epic depicts the battle between Marduk and Tiamat (mother of life), Tiamat is believed by some to be the physical and metaphysical planet Earth. Tiamat seeks revenge over Ea (Enki’s father, primeval God) after Ea killed Tiamat’s husband, Apsu (primeval God). Marduk, being Enki’s son fights against Kingu (the consort of Tiamat) over who will have control of Earth. Marduk ends up winning and slays Kingu; he then creates humankind from his own blood.
Gen. 1:14: And God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years”
Enuma Elish 5:12–13: “The Moon-god he caused to shine forth, the night he entrusted to him. He appointed him, a being of the night, to determine the days;”
The consultation of God(s) before the creation of man:
Gen 1:26: "God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness
Enuma Elish 6:4-9: That which he had conceived in his heart he imparted unto him:"My blood will I take and bone will I fashion. I will make man, that man may. I will create man who shall inhabit the earth”
Prometheus is credited, in Greek mythology as being an enthusiast of mankind as he went against the other God’s wishes and taught forbidden knowledge. Much like Enki, who was considered the God of wisdom and knowledge, among other things. Enki was one of the keepers of divine decrees called ME, these ME made civilization possible as they held the secrets to technology, societal development, agriculture, etc.
According to Laurence Gardner, “The dominant tenet of the new thought was based wholly on the utmost fear of Enlil [Enki’s brother], who was known to have instigated the great Flood [or else acquiesced in not warning the humans, or making any attempt to save them], and to have facilitated the invasion and destruction of civilized Sumer. Here was a deity who spared no mercy for those who did not comply with his dictatorial authority.” Bramley states that, “We therefore find Ea [Enki] as the reputed culprit who tried to teach early man (Adam) the way to spiritual freedom. This suggests that Ea intended his creation, Homo sapiens, to be suited for Earth labor, but at some point he changed his mind about using spiritual enslavement as a means.”
Let’s look at this feisty relationship between the brother God’s in the Biblical perspective.
+It was Enki who created the first humans, AD.AM and EVE.
+It was Enlil though, who created the land that was, ED.EN.
+Enki was the serpent in the garden who urged AD.AM and EVE to eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil in the garden, Enki was the serpent.
+It was Enlil then, who drove them out of ED.EN once they had betrayed his commands, his authority.
+Enki was there to clothe AD.AM and EVE.
It’s interesting to note here the use of the Hebrew word for snake in the Bible, nâchâsh, which translates to ‘the hissing serpent’. But it comes from the word NHSH, which means ‘to decipher, to find out’.
Originally posted by hawk123
Thanks for this update.
Last year I was in Athens and my hotel was on the same street as Zeus.
en.wikipedia.org...(Athens)
The numerical value of NCHSH (serpent) is 358; it is therefore
equivalent by Gematria to MSHICH, Messiah
In Jewish messianic tradition and eschatology, messiah refers to a future King of Israel from the Davidic line, who will rule the people of united tribes of Israel[1] and herald the Messianic Age[2] of global peace. In Standard Hebrew, The Messiah is often referred to as מלך המשיח, Méleḫ ha-Mašíaḥ (in the Tiberian vocalization pronounced Méleḵ haMMāšîªḥ), literally meaning "the Anointed King."
Christians believe that prophecies in the Hebrew Bible refer to a spiritual savior, partly evidenced in passages from the Book of Isaiah: "Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel,"[Isa. 7:14]
A strong number connection with my previous post and the Maya 's.
www.earthmatrix.com...
"As a psychology major with a Master's degree, I ended up taking 30 pages of notes while watching this video. That's how much of an impact it made on me!" - maya12-21-2012