It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

G20 MILITARY dudes? snatch guy from crowd into unmarked car - Illegal beyond belief

page: 4
91
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 11:54 PM
link   
Hey Militia!

If you can read this, Get off your asses and Protect the Citizens.

The militia should be standing between the Citizens and the paramilitaries.












[edit on 24-9-2009 by Exuberant1]



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 11:54 PM
link   
If they are contracted security.. like blackwater.. they do not have to have any identifying marks on the uniforms.

I doubt those were national guard, or military at all... more than likely contract security brought in for the event.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 11:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Arrowmancer
 


Your first excuse for the action is more reasonable than the second. I watched the video again because of your comment and another. Look at the video stop it when you can see the left arm of everyone their. The two wrestling the kid, the driver, the guy on the passenger side of the car all have that reflective tape on the left arm. I noticed that earlier and then I took a slower look at the two guys that look like cops. The one with the helment and the bandolier of zip cuffs also has that shiny reflective material on his left arm. Couldn't tell about the guy with the mask and shotgun but I'd bet he does to.

Barring some sort of crazy psy-op like you propose in #1 this was an arrest.

For anyone who would like to see what an extraction of undercover operatives looks like refer to the Montebello thread, and I suppose this could be an extraction of an undercover agent. I'd have alot less problem with it if so.

The second arrest looks more like a properly conducted arrest. While the first looks like something you'd expect to see in some Communist dictatorship.

[edit on 25-9-2009 by jefwane]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by detachedindividual
 


It does matter. People analyze things like this. Do you know why?!

Because we have NO CONTEXT in which the video takes place, and people fake videos ALL THE TIME.

So we have to go through an analyze the mistakes a rookie film maker might make when staging something like this for a hoax.

If we accepted everything at face value and acted upon it then we would all have been dead a long time ago.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
If they are contracted security.. like blackwater.. they do not have to have any identifying marks on the uniforms.

I doubt those were national guard, or military at all... more than likely contract security brought in for the event.


That would be a GOOD reason for militias to come out armed. I hate pmc's, and I love that our government uses them for stuff like this as well as katrina and wars. I say if you are willing to kill simply for a good paycheck you are fair game for a woodsman with a rifle. But I digress, that is a very plausible explanation of WHO the snatchers were. Hopefully the kid is at home alright, if not, I hope someone got his name.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Lazyninja

Yeah what was up with that? I thought the character looked like a S&M guy, or some freaky character from a first person shooter game, or some sort of cenobite.

I hope the guys who were taken away aren't being raped or anything, these 'cops' looked like they belonged to some hardcore S&M club.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:13 AM
link   
They are not playing over there right now....

www.youtube.com...

Any act of defiance will be dealt with swiftly.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Exuberant1
 


"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason


Get your gun and get out there.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:16 AM
link   
Didn't someone write in the police scanner thread that some guy said he had a bomb in his back pack? and then later the street name Baum was mentioned over and over on the scanner.

Perhaps this is the same guy, in the first video. He is wearing a backpack. Who knows? Maybe they just wanted to get him as far away from the scene as quickly as possible to avoid death and destruction. They take bomb threats really seriously, especially these days.

Of course there are probably tons of protesters who had backpacks on so maybe its not the same guy.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:20 AM
link   

ETA2: Heh, one of the later posters asks if it is Luke Rudkowski, which is a strange coincidence because I heard his last name come over the scanner multiple times. I mean I'm sure that there are multiple Rudkowskis, but it was a strange coincidence, because it was shortly after the incident I mentioned in the previous ETA, and it was an officer asking him to spell his name and repeating it to his dispatcher. very odd indeed.


According to the We Are Change website, Luke Rudkowski was in Philadelphia and had a run-in with the National Guard prior to the Summit. He and two other journalists were contacted by the Military and told that they had been placed on a Watchlist.

Military Attempts to Frame Infowars Reporters for Terrorism at g20 Summit

Also, Police confirmed one arrest -- a man who was charged with civil disobedience right before the Police declared 'unlawful assembly' on a crowd and were authorized to open fire with sound canons and tear-gas on protesters.

Police Open Fire as Protesters Throw Rocks

So, it could be that he was arrested by joint Police forces for Civil Disobedience and taken to a Tactical Trailer for processing.

Then again, this could all have been staged by Alex Jones.

This gets stranger and stranger...

[edit on 25-9-2009 by fraterormus]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by digger2381


Get your gun and get out there.


I wish I could.

But I find it difficult to get back into the country - and that's without my guns.

Every region has a militia. In Pittsburg, it is The Middlesex Militia.

They ought to be there at this protests - this is their area.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:38 AM
link   
reply to post by poisonmekare
 


hahaha. okay. there were thousands of people with backpacks...are we having a backpack rodeo?? roundem all up?



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:45 AM
link   
reply to post by poisonmekare
 


I thought about that.

But if someone had a bomb in their backpack, Im throwing them out of my car, not forcing them in.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:50 AM
link   
You think they could be Blackwater ( or whatever they call themselves now) mercenary type police ? After Katrina they were using these types of rent a cop/ mercenaries. Maybe they drafted in some of those for the g20 event?



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:51 AM
link   
Looks like a M. Moore production to me. Clearly fake. You guys do know that 'police' in riot gear can be hired to make a film?



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:57 AM
link   
reply to post by KSPigpen
 


Exactly.

Any real military assigned to that event are going to be wearing their uniforms to AR 670-1 standards.

Some yahoos with leanings like... oh - I don't know.... OP.... could easily go to a surplus store and buy some ACU pieces to wear.

I call total BS on this whole thing.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 12:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by mf_luder
reply to post by KSPigpen
 


Exactly.

Any real military assigned to that event are going to be wearing their uniforms to AR 670-1 standards.

Some yahoos with leanings like... oh - I don't know.... OP.... could easily go to a surplus store and buy some ACU pieces to wear.

I call total BS on this whole thing.


As said before.. contracted security does not have to conform to any standards.

They could wear pink bunny suits if it suited their purpose.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 01:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by poisonmekare
 


I thought about that.

But if someone had a bomb in their backpack, Im throwing them out of my car, not forcing them in.


Well.

You're right.

But maybe if it would save ALOT of people and you were super confident he had it, you'd risk it.

If so, I'd think he'd set it off anyway. Then again, who the hell knows. But people are getting so upset over this, but trust me, 4 guys in one crown victoria, screeching to a halt, jumping out and grabbing a specific guy, and kidnapping him, well he had to be someone or they had to have a reason.

I am not saying anyone specific, but alot of people all day have been seemingly in a hurry to cry foul at everything, but hell, there are alot of people and someone might have a bomb. Lots of victims packed tightly would be ideal for someone trying to kill innocents. Suicide bombers exist. So I basically have no idea what to believe...



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 01:08 AM
link   
reply to post by BaronVonGodzilla
 


Yeah it's possible though. If they were completely confident they could prevent him from setting it off.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 01:33 AM
link   
digger2381:
I'm just throwing the idea out there, because I read about that incident before but didn't see any follow up on that scenario until I see this video of a guy being roughly taken away wearing a backpack. Just wondering if it might be the same guy.

It seemed like the man himself said that he did, so I figure they already knew who it was.

miraj: I wouldn't blame you I'd probably do the same thing
I like to keep my body all in one piece.

[edit on 25-9-2009 by poisonmekare]



new topics

top topics



 
91
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join