It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ferris.Bueller.II
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Exactly. How is the author of the article comparing something that hasn't happened yet?
From article in OP:
In my earlier writings discussing the nationwide school addresses of Presidents George H. W. Bush and Ronald Reagan it turns out I was wrong on one point. It turns out in watchings some clips of the two addresses they were actually very partisan. This new fact makes the conservative hypocrisy toward the neutral Obama school speech even more glaring.
Sounds more like socialist dribble, or Ryan Witt has a time machine and has already seen the future Obama speech. I put my money on dribble.
Originally posted by titorite
reply to post by HunkaHunka
And I suppose you teachers asked you to write Regan?
Originally posted by conspiracyrus
reply to post by HunkaHunka
and isnt obamas address going to be in every school in the nation?
Originally posted by finemanm
Neither Bush nor Regan is President today. If they were and if they wanted to make a speech to my child I would be just as pissed.
Originally posted by conspiracyrus
reply to post by Angus123
Well when you see the video of celebrities pledging service to obama, advocating stem cell research and to be fair some real values... i mean what says there wont be a convoluted agenda in the mix
and yes i know obama didnt make that video but parents wont make that distinction, Obama dug his own hole on this one by surrounding himself with controversy...With healthcare reform with the people he appoints, i mean he created the controversy these people are just trying to sheild their children from it ... and your going to call them Hypocrites? sounds pretty partisan imo
my bad you didnt call neone a hypocrite i got that from someones previous post but the point stands
[edit on 6-9-2009 by conspiracyrus]
[edit on 6-9-2009 by conspiracyrus]
Originally posted by titorite
reply to post by HunkaHunka
Well I just bringing up the fact that you seem convinced that these other presidents utilized the school system to broadcast to a captive audience when in fact the means to do so did not even exist in the time frame you give us.
On WESTLAW, I looked up other news stories about the speech. It was reported as 10 minutes in some reports and 12 minutes in others. It was carried live on CNN, PBS, and [the NBC] and Mutual radio [networks]. The Secretary of Education sent a letter urging schools to have their students watch, but I didn’t find any evidence of how many schools followed that recommendation. And most striking: Bush laid out goals — to increase the graduation rate, improve student competency and better prepare students for entering school — and said, "Let me know how you're doing. Write me a letter. I'm serious about this one. Write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals."
Here are some excerpts:
10/1/91 USA TODAY
President Bush takes to the airwaves today to promote his education goals, a day after the Education Department released a bleak report on students' achievement. Bush is scheduled to make a noontime speech to be carried live by CNN, PBS and Mutual Radio. He'll speak from Alice Deal Junior High School, in Washington's affluent suburb of Chevy Chase, Md.
10/2/91 Cincinnati Post
Bush told students to write him to let him know how they were doing in school and to suggest ways to help achieve his national education goals — to increase the graduation rate, improve student competency and better prepare students for entering school.
10/4/91 Washington Times
Majority Leader Richard Gephardt said Wednesday the Education Department was financing "paid political advertising" by paying technical costs of broadcasting the president's 12-minute speech from Alice Deal Junior High School. . . .
Public Broadcasting Service and Cable News Network televised the speech live and Mutual Radio carried it on its network. Educators had been alerted by mail to encourage classroom viewing.
10/2/91 Baltimore Sun
Yesterday was one of those occasions White House image-makers love.
They gave their boss the hated task of reading a prepared speech from TelePrompTers but put him into one of his favorite places to do it — a small classroom.
Walking casually around the room as he spoke, President Bush gently exhorted 27 rapt eighth-graders — and pupils watching his televised performance throughout the nation — to take control of their own destinies by making sure they get the most out of school.
The effect was part bully pulpit, part campaign ad. Mr. Bush was simultaneously employing the power of his office in the drive to improve American education and making another bid to focus voter attention on what he considers the centerpiece of his domestic agenda.
"I'm asking you to put two and two together," Mr. Bush told Cynthia Mosteller's history class at Alice Deal Junior High School in Northwest Washington. "Make the connection between the homework you do tonight, the tests you take tomorrow, and where you'll be five, 15, even 50 years from now. . . . You're in control." . . .
In one of the few ad-libbed lines of his 10-minute appearance, the president added: "I can't understand for the life of me what's so great about being stupid."
Mr. Bush's speech was part of a broader effort to promote the goals of America 2000, a program that calls for vast improvements in student learning levels by the end of the century. With little new money to put toward the cause, the Bush administration has focused on encouraging students, parents and communities to pressure their schools to meet higher standards.
You say you saw the challenger in school along with other shuttle launches as well as these speechs.
I say you are just exaggerated in defense of your leader not unlike the necon dogs that would always come to the defense of their leader. The players change but the game remains the same.
Originally posted by Alaskan Man
response to HunkaHunka
"So you seem to LOVE obama."
HunkaHunka's reply.
"What? I don't think you see my point. What I love is intellectual honesty. And when people are outraged over this without condemning Bush and Reagan at the same time it reeks of partisan hypocrisy."
haha, riiight, you do realize we can click your user name to view every post you have put up...
your one of the biggest Obama supporters on the site, and i am guessing a die hard democrat.
just another pawn falling for the partisan trap.
please open your eyes, you may see past the left-right paradigm and realize you've been fooled for most your life.
Originally posted by conspiracyrus
reply to post by Angus123
just to let ya know bud i was hung up on another poster about the partisan and hypocracy thing .. you never said anything of the like i just wanted that to be clear
heh i guess in my head i was responding to two people but i think ill just retract the last sentence of that paragraph seeing as its pretty unnecessary and i didnt mean to get you confused my bad
[edit on 6-9-2009 by conspiracyrus]