posted on Jul, 18 2016 @ 07:52 PM
a reply to:
7redorbs
I've given a lot of thought to this over the years. I used to be a pacifist who believed very similar to you in this regards, but I now wonder what
is morally more humane regarding the following two scenarios; (1) If we have a vision of peace and progress for our future humanity, there will have
to be some sacrifices for navigating towards that vision of peace and progress. (2) The current trend seems to be to let the wind blow us wherever it
may, as long as we don't hurt anyone, offend anyone, or label anyone. This leads to innocent and good people being hurt, whereas in scenario number 1
at least we can concentrate our swift and humane punishments (without hatred and anger) on those that actively make this world a worse place by their
actions.
The winds are now strong, and due to no one being willing to stand up and call out people and thinking that create more chaos than good in this world,
we are going to be bringing more chaos until someone grabs the helm and says enough is enough.
edit on 18-7-2016 by Galacticsun because: Forgot to include numbers for my two scenarios. Thanks!