It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
His soul concern is to be one of the few, one of the the what he considers to be the elite the (giggles) the the "elect specimens" if you will the ELECT SPECIMEN.
Taken off the Earth before the final trumpet sounds.
Originally posted by jkrog08
reply to post by Before2017Victor
Just [color=gold]step back, read and listen to what you are saying......PLEASE....
First off why in the world are you bringing religion into this? It has NOTHING to do with ANYTHING here.
Secondly...What does "not being able to prove we are here" have to do with anything related to Victor and the alien interview, or anything ET related for that matter?
Finally, I want to make it CLEAR that I believe Victor(as well many other alien theories), I also believe that many ETs are visiting Earth and have been for sometime. BUT, all I am saying is that we can NOT proclaim something as fact without evidence to back it up. I mean, how do you think the mainstream population would reply to your reply to me?
You are NOT trying to convince me my friend, WE are trying to convince the rest of the world. And the way to go about it is through PURE EVIDENCE AND SCIENCE..........Not blindly believing something and cutting down those who do not agree with your speculative theory with no evidence to back it.
Why don't we first prove that ETs exist and are visiting Earth BEFORE we start speculating on what or what not makes our existence up, as well as the religious implications.
[edit on 8/29/2009 by jkrog08]
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
reply to post by Before2017Victor
I'm curious, what do you think would happen if everyone who read this thread suddenly, magically believed everything? If we all saw your words and were struck with the obviousness of alien life and how simple the whole thing really is, when you get down to it. "Aliens?" Yessir, they're out there.
What then? You've got people believing what YOU want them to believe instead of what the government wants them to believe, and that just puts you in the same control. You might say you've got benevolent intentions, but I'm sure the governments believe they do as well.
Besides, are you 100% certain of your beliefs? If you are, if there is absolutely zero doubt in your mind that things may not be exactly how you perceive them to be, you should be able to show everyone here, regardless and beyond their own skepticism, why you're correct.
When you have the truth, you can show it to people. Right now, you're not showing anybody anything other than words, and words don't really mean a lot when you're trying to explain that the world is coming to an end within the next seven or eight years.
You've obviously got a lot of passion, so use that fire to dig deep and uncover something (like Victor wanted), not to beg people to suddenly change their beliefs because you're asking them to.
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
Well, there's one thing you're absolutely wrong about, and that's that we all have the answer inside us. We don't, because we don't know. If we did, chances are good that we wouldn't be here on these forums debating it, because there's no reason to debate when you know.
You're speaking in platitudes, and that doesn't help anyone with anything other than happy feelings. Do you want people to actually search for truth, or just believe for the sake of believing? Maybe I could convince myself that I believe, no matter what, but that doesn't mean anything without outside proof and validation of my beliefs.
I'm sure a lot of the skeptics on this site actually believe (or at the very least, want to believe) but without sufficient outside proof, it would simply be lying to themselves.
Originally posted by MegaCurious
reply to post by easynow
I wonder if that poor alien dood in the video is ok. I wonder if there's still hope for the poor little dude?
[edit on 29-8-2009 by MegaCurious]
Originally posted by boomadatigger
I thought a group of people conducted an analysis of Victor's voice and speech pattern and determined that he was really Whitley Strieber. I remember one C2C caller accusing that on the Art Bell show a few weeks or months later. Anyone remember that?
Originally posted by Before2017Victor
reply to post by watchd0g
To an extent I agree with you on this.
Yes, sure, hurray for skeptics. They do help to pull the believers back down when things get too grandiose in our heads.
I think someone in this thread already provided evidence. Very convincing evidence that the probability of the footage being a hoax is relatively low.
But, again how does one really prove these theories?
It is beyond the realm of human and our scientific understanding.
We can only go by feelings really. And trusting other people.
Listen to the way "Victor" is speaking.
Either: a skeptic could say this man deserves and Oscar or this man knows something and is completely honest in what he's saying.
How does you measure this stuff is all I am asking?
If we go by what the skeptics say all the time then we may be failing to see the bigger picture.
Then all we're left with is just a big, stupid, dumb, old, boring, lonely planet with a bunch of noisy, smelly things running around asking questions and creating havoc.
[edit on 29-8-2009 by Before2017Victor]