It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
(GEE....this sorta blows the whole notion of an "inside Job", now, doesn't it? IF UA93 had impacted the WH??? Certainly, the PTB, the "evil ones" behind this whole thing, would have KNOWN the Prez's schedule...right???)
Originally posted by bsbray11
No, that's a really bad representation of what I was saying you should prove.
Why don't you recap your theory as to how all this stuff just happened to come together and do this, and I'll point out to you specifically what I want to see sources/references/evidence for. Okay?
Ie tell me your theory again, and I'll tell you what you need to validate it.
Corrosive gases
Air, oxygen: The reaction between air and a material is normally called oxidation and is quite often observed as a separate discipline in regard to corrosion science. In most industrial cases where metal is in contact with air, the oxidation processes are not as much determined by plain oxidation by oxygen but one has to consider all possible contaminants of the air which can have disastrous consequences for the oxidation resistance.
Steam: Steam in contact with steel can effect the carbon level of the steel can also oxidize the iron.
Carbon, carbon oxides and methane: Compounds of carbon like carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and methane can change the carbon level in the steel and subsequently influence the mechanical properties of the metal.
Sulfur containing Gases: Even in small amounts, sulfur in various forms can accelerate corrosion at high temperatures.
Hydrogen: Hydrogen gas is a reducing agent and in contact with steel at high temperatures can result in decarburization and the subsequent formation of hydrogen carbons; C(Fe) + 2H2 CH4
Nitrogen: Nitrogen plays in most cases no role in oxidation phenomena as it is overshadowed to the large effect of oxygen and most nitrides are only formed at high temperatures. However, active nitrogen produced from ammonia can form nitrides below 540oC.
Combustion gases: The gas mixture arising from combustion of fuels contains for a large part carbon oxides and water vapor together with nitrogen. In situations with incomplete combustion hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and several hydrocarbons are present as well as oxygen. Most fuels contain sulfur compounds so that sulfur oxides and even hydrogen sulfide will be present in the combustion gases resulting in more severe corrosive conditions.
Chlorine and hydrogen chloride: Dry chlorine and hydrogen chloride do not cause major problems as far as corrosion is concerned however, accidental or deliberate increases of the moisture in the gas result in rapid localized attack.
Originally posted by SPreston
reply to post by GenRadek
Wow. A major scientific breakthrough?
Wait until all the foundries find out they can create their molten steel for pouring by using water.
Water is so much cheaper than natural gas or black oil.
They will save millions of dollars.
You are a genius General.
posted by GenRadek
SPreston, please check your incredulity at the door. If you are not interested in fact or having an intelligent conversation, then please find your way out the door.
who are genuinely interested in having an intelligent discussion.
Originally posted by SPreston
Adding water to hot metal in order to make it hotter or even turn it into molten steel, is called having an intelligent discussion?
If you say so.
But NIST Engineer John Gross said there was no molten steel under the WTC.
Are you also calling him a liar?
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Since OP posted nothing of the content of this National Geo. entertainment
special it is hard to comment on it.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Well SPreston if you had any real researching capability beyond the conspiracy sites, and an understanding of chemistry, you would see that it is true.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by SPreston
Adding water to hot metal in order to make it hotter or even turn it into molten steel, is called having an intelligent discussion?
If you say so.
But NIST Engineer John Gross said there was no molten steel under the WTC.
Are you also calling him a liar?
Well SPreston if you had any real researching capability beyond the conspiracy sites, and an understanding of chemistry, you would see that it is true. However if you can find anything credible that shows this is not true, by all means please post it here.
However, molten "steel" has never been 100% proven by anyone, nor confirmed.
All I have done is put forward facts that are relevant to the discussion on what caused the corrosion on the steel beams, and the heat, and the appearance of molten "MATERIALS".
If you would like I will be most happy to provide you with links and sources on corrosion, oxidation, the process of commercially making hydrogen and what exactly hydrogen does when it burns, how sulfur is corrosive, how oxidation of iron and steel is an exothermic reaction, and how the combination of all of these seemingly "unrelated" events can combine to create what has happened to some of the steel in the WTC piles. I can supply you with pages and pages of facts. However I also realize that it will be a futile exercise since you have shown time and again you really are not interested in facts and no matter what i put forward it shall be dismissed with your trademark incredulity and handwaving away.
Who said anything about John Gross? I am not calling him anything, his statement does not affect what I posting about.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Your excessive posts of scientific mumbo jumbo...
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Your excessive posts of scientific mumbo jumbo are NOT tied to the happenings at the world trade towers by anything but smoke and mirrors.
No matter what pant load you try to leave on the reader.
The most important factor you have omitted is the element of time.
Were people before 1491 frauds for believing the world is flat or just miserably ill informed?
Originally posted by CameronFox
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Since OP posted nothing of the content of this National Geo. entertainment
special it is hard to comment on it.
I suggest you re-read the OP and click the link that was posted. This will give you access to the website along with many pictures etc.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Your excessive posts of scientific mumbo jumbo...
Translation: "I haven't a clue as to what you're talking about, so I must handwave it away and bring up the flat earthers from centuries ago. [/quote
Read carefully. Ok got yer spects?
Element of time!!!!!
[edit on 23-8-2009 by Donny 4 million]
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Your excessive posts of scientific mumbo jumbo are NOT tied to the happenings at the world trade towers by anything but smoke and mirrors.
No matter what pant load you try to leave on the reader.
The most important factor you have omitted is the element of time.
Were people before 1491 frauds for believing the world is flat or just miserably ill informed?
OH!!! I GET IT!
Real facts are nothing more than scientific mumbo-jumbo and smoke and mirrors, and crappy, error filled "papers" printed in a pay-to-print vanity journal is science gold?
*excuse me while the laughter dies down*
So I take it you are not interested in facts, you never were interested in facts, and even if God himself came down and said there was no "inside government job" and it was done in fact by extremist Muslim terrorists, you would believe that He TOO is a part of the conspiracy.
So rather than go on and on and on with your incredulity and antics, hows about explaining how what I typed is wrong, how it has nothing to do with the steel discovered and the observed effects on it, and explain how all of it is non-admissible to the discussion? Since understanding chemistry is mystery to you, and it all looks like "smoke and mirrors" please refute anything I have said, coherently and most importantly INTELLIGENTLY and backed up with actual facts.
And here is the IRONIC TWIST! You are behaving exactly like the flat-worlders when explorers and scientists of the time said the world is round, AND like the people who believed the sun and the planets revolved around the Earth. My my my, how the tables have turned!
[edit on 8/23/2009 by GenRadek]
Real facts are nothing more than scientific mumbo-jumbo and smoke and mirrors, and crappy,