It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by Icon_xof
How would it matter to me?
Not greatly. If god does exist then fine, it can do as it pleases and I'm not going to be able to do much. But if one odes exist then it's likely to have always existed and considering the rise and fall of religions over the millennia, I think we can safely assume that none of them had it right and that god is somewhat unconcerned by our follies.
So I would say that we should as always, concern ourselves with trying to improve ourselves in areas of intellect, health, relationships, technology/quality-of-life and our ongoing evolution as a species (I am of course talking about transhumanism).
Oh and stop picking on the gays! Let them marry for goodness sake, we could use the revenue right now.
I do not think it is safe to assume that none of them had it right. Perhaps all of them had it right, IN THE BEGINNING.
We begin to revel in this world that we can EXPERIENCE.
If indeed this world is the only thing you believe we have. Then by all means, transhumanism is definately the way to go.
In the beginning? So God won't try to maintain his religion? You seriously think that "Man with his brilliant ideas" has a more powerful influence than god?
The real life situations are in the US where many politicians are very religious and base their decisions and morals on their faith.
It's not God's religion, therefore it's not his to maintain. It is in our hands. It was given to us.
And sure, you may you see it as naive to think we are his special creations.
Does a mother/father not cherish his/her child(ren)? Does one not try to nurture them to be something they can be proud of? (generally speaking)
But we are not god's children, it's offspring. If god exists, that still doesn't mean it made us, cosmically we are infinitesimally insignificant with sort lifespans. At least with parents they hold you and teach, god is not even apparent. And look at the crappiness of the world, he must be a very poor parent.
The god that you envision is lazy, irresponsible and incompetent when it comes to us.
Or is it the other way around friend? Perhaps you are lazy, irresponsible, and incompetent, when it comes to Him.
But religions are astonishingly different and they all come and go. What makes your religion and more truthful that the Ancient Egyptians or Ancient Greeks. The God of the old testament is more angry and sadistic than all the sill god's of the ancient Greeks. It's nonsense.
But we are not god's children, it's offspring. If god exists, that still doesn't mean it made us, cosmically we are infinitesimally insignificant with sort lifespans.
So to presume that it made us and cares for us is a very stupid thing to do. But I'll ask you. "Do you want to believe that god exists and cares for us?" If the answer is yes, and I'm figuring that it is, then you need to consider that perhaps reality just isn't what you want it to be. Hell, it's not what I want it to be either.
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
- Carl Sagan "
How can I be? I don't have reason to believe it exists and it has not revealed itself to me - even when I was a Christian.
Proof and faith cannot coexist.
Those are indeed different times.
Religion to me is a personal thing. One must make up their own mind. In my mind, the NEW Testament, is called NEW for a reason. The teachings of Jesus have conflict with the teachings of the OT, I will admit. This is why I am prone to think the OT is more or less the product of man. Not indefinately, yet still diluted.
Perception friend, we are indeed infinitesimally insignificant through your eyes.
'Want' is what my flesh does. Like the Buddha said, reality is what we make it. I am perfectly content with my reality. I know what I want and I strive to achieve it. Am I wrong for doing so?
Sagan should know full-well that 'grasping the universe as it really is' is to persist in a delusion as well. How does one substantiate the claims of knowing the universe as it really is? I do not know....
Again, the reason is faith. If it has revealed itself to you, you no longer have to rely on faith.
True, but it doesn't need to be one or the other.
Faith is defined as a belief without evidence, it therefore also means belief without certainty. So I remain in a position of uncertainly, a.k.a. doubt.
The bible says God is unchanging.
Also, a great deal of the OT is completely unverifiable. Not a scrap of evidence for the existence of King Solomon, for starters. Exodus, is another. ALL of Genesis is unverified and much is impossible.
But there are still major issues here. There is no guarantee, after all all the books of the bible had human authors. There is also the Problem of Paul who seems to have a greater impact on Christos's religion than Christos. Then there is the problem that there is no evidence for Christos Yeshua's existence, conflicting accounts and alternate accounts in apocryphal texts. There is also the fact that much of even Christos's teachings are borrowed from other religious sects - The golden rule pre-dates Christos by 500 years by Confucius. Much of the doctrines and even texts can be seen to be lifted from older religions, many of them Pagan religions. For instance, an early version of Psalm 104 was known as the Hymn to the Aten.
Not through my eyes, but in the context of all that we know about the universe. Some 14 billion years the universe has existed, hand god's "special creation" as it is now has only existed for around 8 thousand years (before hand we were no greater different to animals foraging, hunting in packs). The universe will be awash with life now and long after we are gone. The only way that we could become significant is if we evolved ourselves technologically to stretch our lifespans to match that of cosmic events.
Surely if you were to humble yourself as your book teaches, you'd be willing to make the ultimate step of humility and accept the possibility (though I would say "probability") that we are naught but dust in the wind.
But if your desire is influencing your perception of reality, then "you've been living in a dream world, Neo."
He is not saying that he knows absolutely the nature of the universe, he's saying that one should not indulge in beliefs that have no evident basis.
But why should I rely on faith?! There are 100's of thousands of 'faith's in the world and every one of them is equally valid. And faith is no reason to believe - I can't understand how people could take such pride in ignorance - if god is going to send me to hell for not believing then it is his fault for not giving me reason to believe.
I want you to try and visualise your argument from the otherside.
A skeptic criticises your belief for lack of empirical evidence. You respond by basically saying that evidence is unimportant. To us you sound no better than the psychics and pallor magicians. "Believe anyway." is the long and the short of your argument. "... No." we'd respond because your argument doesn't deliver.
I am not the one to decide for you. You must decide for yourself. There are no "facts" that say there is/isn't a Grand Creator.
For you friend. For me it is different. I have facts within myself that are impossible to reveal. You must search yourself for the answer, and if your answer is to not believe, then I wish you the best of luck.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by Agree2Disagree
Truth is demonstrable. These facts are not but subjective beliefs that you have a great amount of faith in but you probably don't realise that believing in them convinces you they are truer when they may not at all be.
Who are you to say what I know and what I don't? To have my reality is to have walked in my shoes, which indeed you have not.
Don't you care that you maybe living in a complete fantasy? What if one of the other fantasies isn't a fantasy but the truth - believing as you do would then be a blinder to truth as faith is.
It does not bother me. I bear not a single fraction of regret for living a life of love, compassion, and understanding.
When the time comes for real truth, let us all be enlightened. Until that time, we will be separated. I will only be proven right or wrong only in death, as will you. Will you regret it? Probably not, because you believe in your own comprehension, knowledge, and life experiences. The same goes for me.
Who are you to say what I know and what I don't? To have my reality is to have walked in my shoes, which indeed you have not.
It does not bother me. I bear not a single fraction of regret for living a life of love, compassion, and understanding.
When the time comes for real truth, let us all be enlightened. Until that time, we will be separated. I will only be proven right or wrong only in death, as will you. Will you regret it?