It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Duke_Nukem
Colonel, I just fear that while we are attempting to do all of this that there would be another attack of some type, if another 9-11 occured ( without any DOUBT about who did it) what would be an apropriate response?
We drop support for Israel, fine, what will that do for the stability of the region? IN THE NEAR TERM.
That's why I put you as President. What ever actions you take from my point of view must keep Americas interests in mind. our people are there now and as President that must be your main concern. The American people must be your concern.
To many it seems the answer is clear, just pull out, but what are the full ramifications of such an action? Like it or not the Middle East is of strategic importance to the US. Do we back off and take our lumps? Do we say screw you we're the USA ? Do we say we screwed up but we're going to do the best we can to get things right?
What happens if Israel attacks Iran? Iran gets Nukes? Pakistan goes to a fundamentalist Islamic Rule? What ever actions we take are going to have an effect on the stability of the region.
Originally posted by Slayer
I'd nuke Texas. That'd solve a lot of our problems.
Originally posted by curme
They can keep the peace until free elections, and won't have all of the hatred to US does.
I would certantly NEVER BOOT LICK THE UN, nor would I give away American SOVERINTY to such a corrupt entity.
As far as the UN goes, i wouldnt apologise to them, I would put a fire under their butts....We pay the lions share for their operations,and gee, USA armed forces comprise most of the muscle anyway so getting them (UN) more into Iraq means american troops with blue helmets rather than green ones...some change there except that the UN would be using American lives instead of America, and Im not giving up my armed forces lives, control or responsibility to a corrupt and mostly anti USA body politic.
I would spearhead a full investigation of the food for oil scandal. and demmand justice!
Again, its time for the UN to put up and shut up.
Originally posted by CazMedia
Hey, after we get several Presidential adgendas for review here,
why dont we have a mock election and see who would get re elected based on the platforms they've provided?
Fun and political, and noone really gets hurt.
Originally posted by Duke_Nukem
To get the UN in: first, you must apologize. Then build a coalition of nations (run by the UN). That means we would have to give up the oil. But, this is needed becasue we can't do this alone as you can see.
Colonel, I just fear that while we are attempting to do all of this that there would be another attack of some type, if another 9-11 occured ( without any DOUBT about who did it) what would be an apropriate response?