It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
DONT WORRY GUYS!!! Shes isnt gonna remeber it anyway. Stop crying.
If my 83 yrld grandmother wants to pick up a knife and walk around a public place then by all means gun her down. Just because people are crazy does not give them and exucse to weild a weapon.
A good point has come up in the last 5 pages of the discusion. The question is; why didn't anyone else help the woman? It is my opinion that people do not help for two reasons. The reasons are:
1. People are afraid of law suits.
2. Everyone also believes that the police will find some crime to charge them with.
Basically, on every front you look, civil and criminal people believe that if they are a 'Good Samaritan' they will be in trouble. It is true many states now have 'Good Samaritan' laws but they are mainly there to protect people with medical training. Doctors, R.N.'s, EMT's are excused from any liability when they help someone outside of their duty. The same is not true for individuals or the general public: they are liable. People are afraid to help on a civil level.
The criminal side of the house scares the public as well. The public is of the opinion if they help they could be:
1. Charged with interfering.
2. Cops will associate them with a crime/crimes the person they innocently help may be guilty of or involved in doing.
3. The public is also afraid of angering the cops so that they become walking targets for the police.
4. Generally accused of anything. For example, the person helped had 500.00 dollars cash and now doesn't. If an EMT or another cop took it the person who is the civilian becomes an attractive fall guy.
People are afraid of being accused of something criminal. People are afraid of being liable civily. Therefore, it is my opinion people don't help for the above mentioned reasons. Cops rarely think of this because they act with impunity on/off duty.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by LoneGunMan
If you were there you would probably would have gotten yourself cut by the old lady or worse, killed.
Now, don't start claiming that you are some sort of superhero and you could have gotten the knife without some sort of altercation with the old lady, because you should know that people with Alzheimer can become very violent very quickly.
Originally posted by GTORick
Personally, I dream of a day when we can go through a drive-thru get coffee, liquor, guns and cigarettes and have a chance to use them all before I get home.
Originally posted by eNumbra
I'm aware there are ways to disarm a person without slamming them to the ground. The problem is, if someone is brandishing a knife (blade is obviously pointing outward) and you go to disarm by grabbing around the weapon arm you will more than likely be getting slashed.
The only reason there is a percieved problem here is that it happened to an elderly woman.
the only dangerous people with a knife are professional knife fighters
WOW...can you be anymore inexperianced with knife incidents?
Bottom line most of you have never and will never deal with what cops deal with...EVER! Talking about it from your computer desk and actually being on scene are two different things.
Originally posted by truthquest
reply to post by MegaCurious
It was either 50 stitches for the officer or 50 for the old lady. Since the old lady was the one attacking a police officer with a knife, I'd rather see the old lady with the stitches. I can hardly believe there are so many hand-to-hand combat experts at ATS. I don't think you guys know what you are talking about.
There is tons of police brutality and even more police rudeness in the USA, but this is neither. I'd rather ATS focus on the recent string of celebrities who have been arrested for "wandering around" and "trying to get from point A to point B at an airport". Both are not crimes, much unlike wielding a knife at an officer.
Originally posted by Dramey
at absolutely no point did the woman in the video, that is the subject of this thread, pose any threat whatsoever to the officer or the people involved
she was a woman in her 80s who had Alzheimer's and walked with a cane
if she is considered a threat in anyone's mind then they are obviously a very feeble and insecure person
a person in a wheelchair could escape danger from this woman
once the officer had grabbed the woman the threat was over, there was no need for the throw to the ground
the woman was old 1st of all, on top of that, she appeared to weigh no more then 140 pounds, and thats not some boxer, its a old alzheimer lady, that meant there was probably barely any muscle
anyone grabbing her arm would immediately disarm her
bottom line this cop was wrong
anyone who doesnt see that is blind and or a police officer and or someone with a agenda or something to gain from arguing this case
and to me we dont need anyone that pathetic on ats
and on top of all of that
its argued who should get the 50 stitches
the old woman who has no clue what is going on (the old woman with alzheimers)
or
the person whos career is to serve and protect, paid by we the people to serve and protect we the people
in my opinion its part of their job to go into risky situations and handle them appropriately
anyone who thinks this was the appropriate reaction is extremely out of touch with reality and nothing more then a troll seeking attention
and unfortunately it seems there isnt a single thread here on ats anymore that isnt plagued by troll like opinions
Originally posted by detachedindividual
I have been reluctant to post in response to this story because reading the insane thoughts of some others disturbs me a little.
But I give up, it's too good an opportunity to pass up.
This is an old woman.
I could have removed this "threat" with a cup of tea and a biscuit.
That is the problem with American Policing, they treat all people like they are the next terrorist incident just waiting to happen. There's not common sense, just training to be "a hero" in everything they do.
They've forgotten that a Police Officer needs to be more than the first finger of the law. They need to be social workers, teachers, medical staff, babysitters, carers...
They all seem to think they are G.I. Joe!
Yes she had a knife, but she clearly isn't stable.
If a kid was walking around that car park with a knife, would they have acted in the same way? (it actually wouldn't surprise me if some dumb cop did use that move on a child under the same situation, they seem so completely detached from reality and reason!)
The fact is this was an old woman. Whatever move is "legal", you have to have some common sense and realize that the threat is minor and the situation could have been handled with a bit more intelligence and less "act now think later".
IMO, this is just another example of everything wrong with modern policing. Every incident to them is a potential terrorist incident in which they get to play hero.
It's sad, and it's pathetic, that policing in your country has sunk so low as to not be able to discriminate between a true threat and an old lady who's lost her marbles.
Originally posted by truthquest
reply to post by MegaCurious
It was either 50 stitches for the officer or 50 for the old lady. Since the old lady was the one attacking a police officer with a knife, I'd rather see the old lady with the stitches. I can hardly believe there are so many hand-to-hand combat experts at ATS. I don't think you guys know what you are talking about.
There is tons of police brutality and even more police rudeness in the USA, but this is neither. I'd rather ATS focus on the recent string of celebrities who have been arrested for "wandering around" and "trying to get from point A to point B at an airport". Both are not crimes, much unlike wielding a knife at an officer.