It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Clickfoot
reply to post by Tifozi
Maybe you're right. But the fact that people called the police, and made that thread in the first place, suggests this wasn't simply fireworks. Maybe some of those people saw/heard fireworks. But the fact is, those reports are there, and unless all those people are idiots, it shouldn't be ruled out. I know damn well I wouldn't mistake fireworks for anything else.
Originally posted by sickofitall2012
I just realized while I was reporting my experience to UFO casebook, Where the heck is the " WIDE LOAD " sign that it placed on ALLover-sized equipment transports. If this is just some innocent machinery being transported, where the heck is the freakin sign????? Who cares about a missing tarp, where is the wide load sign???? Isn't it a law???
Originally posted by sickofitall2012
I just realized while I was reporting my experience to UFO casebook, Where the heck is the " WIDE LOAD " sign that it placed on ALLover-sized equipment transports. If this is just some innocent machinery being transported, where the heck is the freakin sign????? Who cares about a missing tarp, where is the wide load sign???? Isn't it a law???
Originally posted by sickofitall2012
reply to post by WeSbO
I remember those wide load signs being pretty big, and in the second photo I can see the back of the truck and the object pretty clearly as it appears to be lite up by the lights on the escort cars. I see no evidence of any kind of banner or license plate.
Jeff Bridges Reply » | Report Abuse | Judge it! | #49 2 hrs ago Tweet from same guy: It was basically a full scale F35 model built to test for stress and such. pretty funny seeing the web report. we are all LOAO
Originally posted by sickofitall2012
reply to post by ratphour
Doesn't look anything like photo # one. I know what the front of a jet looks like and that is not it.
Good try though. I want to know why there was no wide load sign across the back. Lockheed doesn't have to follow transport laws? I have a sneaky suspicion about this. Why would the radio station hide that?
[edit on 11-8-2009 by sickofitall2012]
Originally posted by ratphour
Jeff Bridges Reply » | Report Abuse | Judge it! | #49 2 hrs ago Tweet from same guy: It was basically a full scale F35 model built to test for stress and such. pretty funny seeing the web report. we are all LOAO
Source, Page 3 - Post #49
I-20 UFO Picture #2, rear view side by side with a F-35 Joint Strike Fighter rear view.
F-35 source
UFO Picture #2 source
To me, IMHO, looks close, remove the wings/tail/engine.. Just leave it with a chassis.
Originally posted by Larryman
An alien ship would not land on a busy highway, when there are plenty of large empty parking lots available.