It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source from above link.
Summary: Polynesian settlement of New Zealand (c. 1000 yr B.P.) led directly to the extinction or reduction of much of the vertebrate fauna, destruction of half of the lowland and montane forests, and widespread soil erosion. The climate and natural vegetation changed over the same time but had negligible effects on the fauna compared with the impact of settlement. The most severe modification occurred between 750 and 500 years ago, when a rapidly increasing human population, over-exploited animal populations and used fire to clear the land.
Originally posted by Essan
We seem to have gone ff track.
Does anyone have any valid reason why evidence for the presence of humans in New Zealand before the Maoris would be supressed by archaeologists?
Originally posted by MoothyKnight
I don't get it, why would they want to cover up cool things like this? I'm assuming it would be for religious means considering what the major religions believe. This would probably cause a lot of hell in their world. But still, it seems stupid to hide something this cool.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Essan
If anyone is unsure about those events...they could read this...THE POLYNESIAN SETTLEMENT OF NEW ZEALAND IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND BIOTIC CHANGES
Originally posted by chiron613
I don't think any of us would appreciate someone digging up our deceased ancestors in the name of "science", no matter how interesting those ancestors might be. Why should the Maori be any different? It's just a desecration to dig up their ancestors.
I'm not seeing any serious conspiracy here, other than a belated sensitivity to the customs and sensibilities of the Maori. If they revere their dead, who are we to dig them up?
As for the unusual sizes of these alleged bones - easy to say, when there's nothing to prove it wrong. You can say they had three heads and tentacles, or anything else you want. But, is it true? Or is it just an embellishment to a story of not allowing people to dig up other people's ancestors?
Originally posted by Desolate Cancer
I just feel like it would be next to impossible to keep a lid on these types of things. Since there is no national security involved, and those who discover it realize the huge implications I just cant imagine them staying quiet.
Originally posted by careface
there is an archealogical coverup going on throughout the whole world.
frankly i'm sick and tired of it. i am ready for the veil to be removed from our faces.
one can only hope that on december 21st, 2012 is when the veil will be lifted.
Originally posted by spellbound
reply to post by rapunzel222
In the huge echo of silence I am posting what I was taught.
That the Moriori was here first.
That the Maori decimated them, and they fled to the Chatham Islands.
Actually, the Maori ate them. Tell me I am wrong.
Originally posted by Recouper
Originally posted by Desolate Cancer
I just feel like it would be next to impossible to keep a lid on these types of things. Since there is no national security involved, and those who discover it realize the huge implications I just cant imagine them staying quiet.
Ok, so lets say they tell all their friends and family. Does that necessarily mean people in general are going to hear about it and accept it as truth? If it isn't reported on TV or in the national newspaper will the lid come off?
Originally posted by Recouper
reply to post by rapunzel222
rapunzel222, not sure if there was a misunderstanding. What I meant in my comment is pretty much what you re-iterated in your reply.
I could be wrong, but it seemed to me like you were schooling me, when we seem to have the same or simalar view about exposure of finds made by contractors.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by rapunzel222
The Gympie Pyramid has caught the interest of a lot of people. A quick look online shows the usual suspects...secrets, conspiracies, Incan trans-oceanic voyages etc etc. A guy in Australia was asked about 'ol Gympie and actually went and investigated the claims, located the people and went to the 'pyramid.'
In Quest of
Australia's lost pyramids
I imagine you won't believe it because it's written by a qualified scientist. On the other hand, the article is an excellent example of how these myths grow in stature. His article is pretty rare online, yet Rex Gilroy and extraordinary claims for pyramids in Australia are by the hundred.
I mean this in a humorous way so don't take offense...your lecturers must be nervous around you. As they are lecturing there must be just one face scowling at them in distrust and disbelief from the back of the hall