ufo caught on bbc webcam during live broadcast

reply to post by Sam60


no...really, that's who that big wabbit is!!!

i got the joke, just not sure why it was directed at me, i assume it was a bludgeoning but i might be over sensitive today.

Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by Sam60

 

no...really, that's who that big wabbit is!!!

i got the joke, just not sure why it was directed at me, i assume it was a bludgeoning but i might be over sensitive today.

Hey......no worries.

I just go a bit "odd" every time I get in a "rods" argument.

I should know better!



[edit on 7-8-2009 by Sam60]

I think we should consider the size of whatever this bug, orb or craft is.

I've now wondered about the possibility if it could be one of those flying egg shaped craft or even a larger cloaked or similar technology and that what we're seeing is the exhaust.

As difficult as that would be considering a more advanced technology that wouldn't have any exhaust.

So, I would also suspect one of those egg shaped craft that are about as big as a van or midsized truck.

Originally posted by aleon1018
I think we should consider the size of whatever this bug, orb or craft is. (...)

So, I would also suspect one of those egg shaped craft that are about as big as a van or midsized truck.

You are assuming the object isn't really close to the camera. Which if it is, and I think it is, it's a really small object giving credence to the idea that this is probably a bug or a bird.

Originally posted by SLAYER69
I say bird.

The motion capture on some web cams are horrible.
[edit on 5-8-2009 by SLAYER69]

I would say in all probability a bird - simply by process of eliminating what it quite probably isn't (ET craft being one example).

Just wondering slayer, when you say webcam, were you just being figurative?

Originally posted by Sam60
G'day Depthof field.........So what do you think.....bug, bird, something else?

hello, Sam60.
I think, most probably a bug. Surely is a bug in our minds.

Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
That is definately no BUG!!
Did you not see how big that thing is? You can tell from the video that's way too big to be a BUG.

Originally posted by aleon1018
I think we should consider the size of whatever this bug, orb or craft is.

Now, WHAT SIZE are both of you talking?

Tell me the size of this bug here:

r24
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e91ea0cc9772.gif[/atsimg]


Can you? You can't.


Nobody can tell the size of an unknown object in a 2D representation (which a single picture is), unless that unknown object can be localized FOR SURE in front or behind a known landmark.

In BBC picture, the "object" could be from just near the camera until the bridge, which is a too great uncertainty...because the depth of field of the camera (boring technicall term).

it coud be a bug.
it could be a bird
it could be a small millitary secret observational device.
it could be an alien craft
it could be Superman.
it could be many other things.

Probability and exactly match of manifestations on picture says: it is a bug.

Finally it is an UFO, as what definition means: "unidentified flying object".

For me, it is unimportant, because i rely on BIG probabilities as beeing just a bug, from my experience telling how bugs manifest in images and how easy is to capture them, and because i don't have enough information to determine what it is (for example a bee from Hymenoptera or whatever class of bees :lol" ).

As i said, finnally is only a subject of discussion.

Originally posted by converge

Originally posted by aleon1018
I think we should consider the size of whatever this bug, orb or craft is. (...)

So, I would also suspect one of those egg shaped craft that are about as big as a van or midsized truck.

You are assuming the object isn't really close to the camera. Which if it is, and I think it is, it's a really small object giving credence to the idea that this is probably a bug or a bird.

This whole thread is based on assumptions and is starting to " BUG" me. No amount of debunking assumptions is going to solve it for everyone.

So, it's a bug. Big deal, next theard, next questionable video.

reply to post by depthoffield


Ok, after a second look at that picture of yours it could well be a bug but i still don't see it........ still seems to big when it goes under the arc of that bridge.....

Anyway.......... i dunno...........

Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by depthoffield

 

Ok, after a second look at that picture of yours it could well be a bug but i still don't see it........ still seems to big when it goes under the arc of that bridge.....

Anyway.......... i dunno...........

That fact or illusion would than most likely disprove the bug theory if it flies under an object and of that size, rather than just in front of it.

[edit on 7-8-2009 by aleon1018]

Originally posted by aleon1018
That fact or illusion would than most likely disprove the bug theory if it flies under an object and of that size, rather than just in front of it.

Have you or anyone else shown that the 'object' flies under the bridge or arc?

Originally posted by converge

Originally posted by aleon1018
That fact or illusion would than most likely disprove the bug theory if it flies under an object and of that size, rather than just in front of it.

Have you or anyone else shown that the 'object' flies under the bridge or arc?

Can you show that it hasn't?

Originally posted by aleon1018
Can you show that it hasn't?

The burden of proof falls on those who claim we are witnessing something extraordinary. Your argument is ad ignorantiam, a logical fallacy.

Until your side provides evidence to support the notion that it's actually a big object and it flies under the bridge, there's nothing for us to try to disprove.



[edit on 7-8-2009 by converge]

reply to post by depthoffield

as beeing just a bug,

Whether you meant it of not, that little play on words made me laugh for sure :-)

As for the video it's so difficult to tell but for what it's worth I guess either a bug or a bird(maybe not). Whatever it is I also laughed at the face he pulls in the last half second of the clip...
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dc923f689418.jpg[/atsimg]

Well this one is close to home so I think I can add a little insight into this.

The news story was from BBC Look North, a local BBC news broadcast from their Studios in Newcastle Upon Tyne. North East England. The camera in question is on the end of a building and overlooks the river Tyne. It’s almost directly opposite Baltic, a large art gallery: can be seen on their website and updates every few minutes. However, it streams constantly to the studio backdrop during news broadcasts.
This type of thing is seen often and really this story only made it to air as an end of show fill in. I’ve seen similar bulletins on many occasions.

Additionally, I was visiting the gallery opposite the camera last week and it was a nice day so I walked along the river bank and noted a large number of small white birds about the place. Don’t ask me what they are as I have no idea. So honestly, I think its nothing more than a bird, and a local station trying to add a little bit of mystery just to to an otherwise boring show!

reply to post by converge


can't you see that this object flies under and through to the other side?

And i have to say again that birds do not fly that fast..... they can dive fast like a bird of prey but not fly in a straight line like that.......

Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
can't you see that this object flies under and through to the other side?

No, I can't see that. And the video is too low resolution and quality to be able to tell for sure if this 'object' flies under the arc of the bridge or if it appears to do that merely because of the perspective.

Dog-soldier on his post says he's been to the area and noticed a number of white birds.

In this video filmed on the bridge (it's called the Millenium Bridge btw) you can hear what to me sound like seagulls.

It's not a stretch to think this was just a bird flying close to the camera and giving off the impression that it flew under the arc.

It's obviously far from conclusive evidence, but then again what evidence is there to support the idea that his is really a big object flying under the arc of the bridge?

And i have to say again that birds do not fly that fast..... they can dive fast like a bird of prey but not fly in a straight line like that.......

I didn't know you were an ornithologist! Btw and since you are such an expert on birds, can you tell me if it's really seagulls that I hear on that Youtube video filmed on the bridge? Thanks


[edit on 7-8-2009 by converge]

Always look to the sky to be sure of a UFO.
Very lightning bright glowing cylinders might not be bugs if they
leave trails across the sky.
We have enough non bug videos to know we do not have bugs all the time.
And not balloons flying at high speed with trails and no wings.

I do not think the object in the video is a bird, although i cannot offer an opinion has to what it might be.

reply to post by converge


Well, after watching that youtube vid on repeat about 10 times just now i gotta say that a bird it aint, a remote controlled plane it aint, a rod.... now that is a definate possibility after watching the video about rods but i doubt it......... so to me it seems like some rocket blasted from some super high-tech ufo.... the way it shoots through like that..........

And btw after watching it tens times on repeat it seems to fly through the arc and then swerve over to the left over the next bridge...........

Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
a rod.... now that is a definate possibility after watching the video about rods but i doubt it.........

I doubt it's a rod too, because well... because rods are complete and total BS! Not to mention that they have been debunked over and over again.

so to me it seems like some rocket blasted from some super high-tech ufo.... the way it shoots through like that..........

What?? It's nice to have an open mind, but really, aren't you overdoing it?