It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by videoworldwide
Then checked and found no Matt Holt or Hill on AE 911 Truth
Originally posted by videoworldwide
Hey....if you are a part of the coverup, Bonez.....then I have every right to investigate you and put the dirt on the internet for the truth seekers to do their own research.
Originally posted by videoworldwide
That's the way the game works.....player.
Ps. It ain't Ghandi
First off, the only one who's so hyper sensitive that they'd see this as a personal attack here is you. Everyone else sees it as an attack on these websites spreading outright nonsense. Second, this author is admitting the problem IS with these websites, becuase they're attempting to stomp out dissenting opinions like his "no planes" scenario in favor of ther own "controlled demolitions" scenario.
Did you even read anyone's posts, before posting this?
My recommendation is don’t waste your time reading the 911 commission report because it is a WHITE WASH nothing but lies and unanswered questions that the people in the United States did not get. It was a cover-up at best.
and that is EXACTLY why you lost your last debate wiith me, and badly. From my point of view, a genuine researcher of the events of 9/11 would want to read EVERYTHING being published on it, for a number of reasons-
1) The more information that one has access to, the more one can weed out the good information from the bad information. It's obvious there are plenty of one-sided opinions out there and it's only from listening to both side that allows us to make an informed opinion. I keep saying this over and over, and it's still true- the truth doesn't have to run and hide from falsehoods. It's falsehoods that have to run and hide from the truth.
2) If the 9/11 commission report really IS just a pack of lies, it would be your responsibility to look at the material specifically to identify the lies and expose it for the source of lies that it is. I keep asking over and over for anyone to point out even ONE actual lie in the report. Just why do you think I do this? If it's lying to us then tell me how it's lying to us. It ain't a trick question.
3) Not to mention, it's intellectual dishonesty to accuse someone or something of being a pack of lies without even knowing what the pack of lies even are. You keep accusing your opponents of not wanting to listen to your information, so you can't have double standards like that.
This is why you lost your debate with me- not only were you unable to identify even ONE falsehood in the commission report, you kept avoiding having to read it even when it was to answer a question YOU asked. I don't know what kind of game you're playing, but I really don't care- All I'm seeing is that YOU are the one who's hiding from the information in the 9/11 commission report. The information in the report isn't hiding from you. You'll forgive me if I'm not seeing a whole lot of credibility coming from you.
Now that I think of it, this other guy's problem with censorship from his fellow conspiracy proponents is becoming crystal clear. His "no planes" scenario is every bit as much of a threat to what you "controlled demolitions" people want to believe as the 9/11 commission report is. He's just threatening you from the opposite direction.
Originally posted by Mark_Amy
Believe it or not, but I'm not playing innuendo games. I'm just simple Joe Public trying to reconcile these two things in my mind. Help me out so that I can understand it because I admit I don't know how these things work with grand juries and indictments, civil court and military court etc.
Even if there was mention of him being wanted in connection for 9/11 or for being a suspect in 9/11 etc that would be something, but it's the way there is no mention of it that makes it look like there is something fishy going on.
Originally posted by impressme
Tell you what, why don’t you post all the truthers websites that tell all these lies and show with proof with sources and links how they have lied. Furthmore, people who are searching for the truth do not support opinions as facts.
Again, you are focusing on me! I am not the topic of this thread. I never lost any debate with you because you don’t know how to debate period. Furthmore, you are lying I had to put you on ignore as I will have to do so again! Anyone reading your nonsense can see who is playing a game. I already made one mistake today and that was by responding to you.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Originally posted by Mark_Amy
Wow! Truthers attacking other truthers. No wonder the debunkers have such a field day with this forum!
yep...Bonez had good points on this issue. I just wish he could see where the ridiculous stops and reality starts.
I wish that for many on this forum.
Originally posted by impressme
It is people like you who have proved that 911 was an inside job and I thank you.
Originally posted by videoworldwide
There is no evidence that any planes hit the twin towers. Yet alone, a specific type of plane.
There is no evidence that any planes hit the twin towers. Yet alone, a specific type of plane.
Originally posted by argentus
reply to post by videoworldwide
I have watched September Clues; I'm aware of four parts. No to the other two.
Originally posted by argentus
I have watched September Clues; I'm aware of four parts. No to the other two.
Google Video Link |