It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Recently a Californian attorney, Orly Taitz, publicly released a copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate. Taitz has filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for authenticating the document, but as of right now, the birth certificate appears authentic. As World News Daily reports, “No doctor is listed. But the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Oduya. It was allegedly used as a certified copy of the original in February 1964. WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical. Despite the fact that a hoax document similar in nature circulated the Internet last week, WND reports that the document ‘bears none of the obvious traits of a hoax.’”[5]
Taitz told WND: “I filed the motion with the court asking for expedited discovery, which would allow me to start subpoenas and depositions even before Obama and the government responds.
I am asking the judge to give me the power to subpoena the documents from the Kenyan embassy and to require a
deposition from Hillary Clinton
so they will be forced to authenticate [the birth certificate].
”[6] The birth certificate was discovered by an anonymous source, who feared publicity because of the possibility of retaliation.[7]
Many Obama supporters have naively claimed that the birther movement has been ridiculous because there is no way the government would allow such a thing to ever happen. Obviously, this discovery raises the question of who allowed this to happen and how honest the American government truly is to its people. Who are the Obama administration and the government really working for?
www.examiner.com...
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by oneclickaway
I am not going to spoon feed you.
Aint that something? you accuse the man of something, your asked back it up under the court of law, and you say "i am not going to spoon feed you".
Yes yes yes that is going to go down well.
There is evidence all over the web.
Text book definition of hypocrisy you are.
There are the divorce documents stating all the dates, times, places etc. There is masses of evidence that Coast province existed and was not part of a region until 64.
www.statoids.com...
Again all talk, nothing to back it up. If there is evidence come up with it and get it backed up by Kenyan officials.
www.scribd.com...
WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
this is the leader of the birther movement? what the heck she is definatley from crackpot central....
Keep on behind her birthers, she on route off a cliff, again.
calm down Orly..... there there
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by oneclickaway
That is wrong.
Uh no its not wrong. The the official label of "Coast province" on documentation did not come about until 1970. In addition even though Kenya became independent in 1963 the republic became official and on documentation on December 1964.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Loke.
Okay . . .
So we can't trust CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, WND, Free Republic, or personal blogs.
WTF are you supposed to use as evidence?
The movement is, naturally, all abuzz. But even people who might normally be inclined to support it, like the founder of conservative forum FreeRepublic.com and the Birthers' favorite self-proclaimed document expert, who declared Obama's Hawaiian certification of live birth a forgery, are calling foul.
Originally posted by oneclickaway
I was not under the delusion that we are in a court of law.
There are the divorce documents stating all the dates, times, places etc. There is masses of evidence that Coast province existed and was not part of a region until 64.
Umm as the divorce was in Hawaii
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
1.) It can easily be proved by the name change from Barry Soetoro to Barak Obama that he is a Muslim. All Muslims change their Christian names to Muslim ones. Would I care if he is a Muslim? Not particularly. But add into that his association with some . . . shady characters, it does raise an eyebrow.
Karl Rove responded to the circulation of the new paper on Twitter, saying "I believe this is likely a forgery."