Debunking ET, 1947-2009 :'Flying Saucers' Do Not Exist But They Are Dangerous And Rapacious To Men

reply to post by GEORGETHEGREEK

........and when you get sick of all that, you can buy the magazines, the books, the CD's, etc...

It's all on there, as usual.

$$$$$$$$$$$$

...

Sam, George.

Guys, stay on topic.

If you want to debate Share International,
go ahead, start a thread.

...

...

I brought a point here, for consideration.

I'm not in the entertainment business,
though I do love to play my guitar.

Also I am a great fan of science fiction.

Not to write it though.

...
..
.

Originally posted by Sol12
...

Sam, George.

Guys, stay on topic.

If you want to debate Share International,
go ahead, start a thread.

...

Your original quote in itself means nothing.

The credibility of the source is pertinent, in order to know background regarding the quote.

The quote is from a new age / alternative money earning site.

The site won't even name the person who made the quote. The site will only say the quote is from "....a senior member of the Hierarchy of Masters of Wisdom..." who is in constant telepathic contact with something or other.

Therefore the discussion regarding the source of the quote is on topic.


[edit on 1-8-2009 by Sam60]

Originally posted by Sol12
...

Sam, George.

Guys, stay on topic.

If you want to debate Share International,
go ahead, start a thread.

...

What topic?

You posted a little snippet that you later admit to taking out of context and didn't even offer any source for where you originally got it.

Then people started wondering what you're talking about and you start coming off as arrogant and rude.

Try creating a thread they way you're supposed to and there will be a reason for people to stay on topic.

Also

....

This stuff

..

Is really

.

Annoying

...

And just wastes space

@Sam60

The message is apparently from Matreiya aka "the anti-christ" - "the one" people call him all kinds of things. I call him a figment of Benjamin Cremes imagination.

[edit on 2-8-2009 by nightmare_david]

[edit on 2-8-2009 by nightmare_david]

Originally posted by nightmare_david

Originally posted by Sol12
@Sam60

The message is apparently from Matreiya aka "the anti-christ" - "the one" people call him all kinds of things. I call him a figment of Benjamin Cremes imagination.

[edit on 2-8-2009 by nightmare_david]

[edit on 2-8-2009 by nightmare_david]

Thanks nightmare_david - I was not aware of Creme.

I just did some reading about him. It looks as if he's another typical cult-of-personality type crackpot. There must be a lot of people with empty lives out there keeping these guys successful.

this looks like an indirect advertising of metreya or some sort.dont think it belongs in this forum at all

...

What is it that some here don't understand
about, someone bringing forward a point
for consideration to the ATS board?

I'm not trying to sell you books/videos?

You don't have to pay for entering/reading my thread?

Nobody forces you to read here.

You are not required to respond.

It's free to agree or disagree.

The only thing you are not supposed to do
is try change the topic, or hijack a thread.

You still don't understand?

Ok,

Find the Bird:


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/413dfbea09ea.jpg[/atsimg]

...
..
.

Originally posted by Sol12
I brought a point here, for consideration.

Not to be rude but, in the New Thread Composition Window it states....

AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.

Since you seem savvy to T & C, you may want to remember that one. Sure many astute members have already "Connected Your Dots" (unintended pun) but please elaborate already or return under the bridge from where you came.

Regards...KK

[edit on 2-8-2009 by kinda kurious]

Originally posted by kinda kurious
but please elaborate already or return under the bridge from where you came.
[edit on 2-8-2009 by kinda kurious]

...

And you seriously expect me to respond to this?

I'm not here to argue.

I'm not the judge here.

The Mods are.

This discussion does not belong here.

...

It would help if you had a point or opinion, to clearly state it. Also helpful would be links to these sources, and the reason for doing so. Nebulous dialog in an attempt to make yourself look clever, is actually rather annoying.

Originally posted by fleabit
Nebulous dialog in an attempt to make yourself look clever, is actually rather annoying.

...

I'm trying to "look clever"?

How about some, trying to look very stupid ??

There is a source, has been provided,
but the source is not the subject here.

I have clearly stated my point.

Disclosure?

We are being deceived, and ET is getting debunked
by means of an illogical approach.

...

reply to post by Sol12
And your point? Your meant to make a discussion not confusion, another member even had to provide the source.

reply to post by Haydn_17


...

He didn't have to.

He did so voluntarily, while I was here
to answer on-topic questions.

...

reply to post by Sol12


As many members here are saying, Sol when starting a thread with a quote you the OP needs to post the source for some credibility so the other members can reply to your thread as you wish. Your first post makes no sense and yes omniskeptic provided the source, still it is up to you to do better research before posting.

No thanks can be given to you as other members are providing links to your thread topic.

reply to post by qonone


...

Hi qonone,

Please take a look at the time stamps.

I posted the thread 1-8-2009 @ 06:33 PM.

Omniskeptic was kind to provide the source link
@ 1-8-2009 06:48 PM.

That was exactly 15 minutes later,
while I was here online.

Now, you tell me this, 2-8-2009 @ 11:59 AM.

Obviously, I had the link ready to post.

I could have added the source link in the OP,
however, I thought to add it later
in order to make the point, what is,
and what is not the subject here.

...

This has been the thread equivalent of Monty Python's French taunter. "Go away or I will taunt you a second time!" One or two replies have made me laugh out loud. Genius!



My turn for a slapdown?! I'm guessing the OP is suggesting that ETs have been unfairly described as dangerous and rapacious when in fact they are all friendly. The 'debunking' refers to the myth that since 1947 UFOs have been denied and/or described as hostile.

They have thus created a major myth: “‘flying saucers’ do not exist but they are dangerous and rapacious to men of Earth”! Likewise, they have taught the people to deride the notion that crop circles are a legacy from Space, yet every government has unassailable proof of the existence, creativity and superior technology of these brave and harmless visitors from the sister planets of our System.

Linked article.

I think the only reasonable position is that we don't have enough evidence to know if there's a 'who' before we consider the 'where' or the 'why.' Speculating on the intentions of a suspected intelligence is premature. Too many ET hypotheses lack intelligence. They often work on the premise that a technologically superior species is unable to make contact without the say-so of a US representative.

^^I just hope mods ban your smarta**.