It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FritosBBQTwist
reply to post by pause4thought
I re-read the article and didn't see anything about life in prison.
Originally posted by pause4thought
Could it be that Gary actually saw real evidence of the type of super-advanced top-secret undercover black projects so beloved of ATS?
Originally posted by Laurauk
reply to post by pause4thought
No, the US Defense, Pentagon what ever youwant to call it, were caught withthier pants down, and they want to make an example.
It beggars believe, that the law courts is allowing this to proceed. Absoultely disgusting to say the least.
Those judges should hang thier heads in shame.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by mr-lizard
reply to post by SLAYER69
You seem quite sure about that Slayer69, what gives you that idea (i ask in all honesty).
I thought he faces long term jail time.
Well if you have to ask then you really don't seem to know much about the American justice system. His lawyers will tie it all up or get it reduced to nothing.
Originally posted by Laurauk
reply to post by h3akalee
I can see it now, American Authorities, face barrage of violence from locals over the extradition of Mr Gary Mckinnon, or it will be UK Extradition authorities, go to collect Mr Mckinnion, bu face a volatile barrage from Locals.
We will be classed as terroists, and taken off to gitmo
[edit on 31-7-2009 by Laurauk]
Originally posted by pause4thought
Those who've looked at the case with an open mind generally conclude he is being made a scape-goat for very lapse security.
Originally posted by Thebudweiserstuntman
There's a petition against his extradition her:
petitions.number10.gov.uk...
I've signed it. Not sure what good it will do.
Originally posted by pause4thought
reply to post by SLAYER69
Good man. That's the spirit. No-one is claiming the guy's a saint. But his minor misdemeanor is leading to his public execution. He deserves justice: a fair trial. For which he'll need massive legal backup.
reply to post by Kaifan
I'm on the fence about the following, but you're an expert, so: what do you say regarding the premise that many hackers have effectively worked towards increasing the security of computer systems by revealing their weaknesses? In fact, in Gary's case I'd go as far as to say what he has achieved is MASSIVELY in the public interest: if what "should" have been secret was so easily available online, it has exposed the monumental incompetence of the institutions funded by public taxation.
[edit on 31/7/09 by pause4thought]
Originally posted by PGRacer
Gordon Brown, grow a pair and tell them this....
You want him America, come and get him. But we pull out of Iraq, Iran, and every other skirmish in the middle east and you have to fight it out on your own. Good luck,
Alan Johnson is under huge pressure to 'pluck up the courage' to save Gary McKinnon after judges warned he might kill himself if extradited. They ruled they could not stop the Government from sending him to the U.S., where the vulnerable Asperger's sufferer faces up to 60 years behind bars.
But the two High Court judges declared in a pointed statement that, if extradited, 'his mental health will suffer and there are risks of worse, including suicide'.
Crucially, the judges also said the 43-year-old computer hacker could be prosecuted in London - a process which would automatically halt extradition
I think the public interest defence is a cop out - often used by hackers/script kiddies. He has stated his intent and it was not to alert the US authorities to possible weaknesses in their systems security.
"I robbed that bank but it was only to show them how it could be done".
Its nonsense.
If i was to forget to shut a window or lock a door before going out, that does not excuse someone coming in and snooping around - even if they don't take anything!
I think the public interest defence is a cop out - often used by hackers/script kiddies. He has stated his intent and it was not to alert the US authorities to possible weaknesses in their systems security.
"I robbed that bank but it was only to show them how it could be done".
Its nonsense.
Originally posted by johnnyflip
Actually, since there was no encryption or even any real security to bypass, the question of the illegality of his actions is a very real issue. These were open systems that required no real hacking at all. The laws are actually pretty vague on this. The real issue is why the UK is letting him be tried in a country where he never even visited to commit his crime. If he is to be tried he should be tried in the UK where the so called crime was committed.