It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
San Fran being the bastion of intelligence.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Oh, and the examples are NOT to numerous to list.
Originally posted by flightsuit
Yes, as a matter of fact, it is. California in general, and Northern California in particular, have sterling literacy rates
You don't like us because we tend to be liberals, so you fantasize that we're not intelligent. Sorry, but quite the opposite is true. Intelligence and what you call "liberalism" happen to go hand-in-hand.
Originally posted by flightsuit
You misspelled "too."
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by kozmo
Why should you care where one is born?
what is the definition of being born English, American or Welsh, or anything else for that matter.
It is a stupid argument,and a stupid law.If you are born in a certain country, then you would be by law, a citizen of that country, like America, Britain and probably most other so-called Democratic countries which allows its citizens to become President or Prime Minister, or even Dictator.
I did include Britain, whose constitution is unwritten, and given a time period allows Commonwealth "citizens" to become a Prime Minister,however a Roman Catholic Prime Minister is so far not on the cards.
Anybody who lives in a Democratic country and who has not disgraced themselves should be allowed to be the chief.
[edit on 20-7-2009 by smurfy]
Originally posted by proximo
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by kozmo
Why should you care where one is born?
what is the definition of being born English, American or Welsh, or anything else for that matter.
It is a stupid argument,and a stupid law.If you are born in a certain country, then you would be by law, a citizen of that country, like America, Britain and probably most other so-called Democratic countries which allows its citizens to become President or Prime Minister, or even Dictator.
I did include Britain, whose constitution is unwritten, and given a time period allows Commonwealth "citizens" to become a Prime Minister,however a Roman Catholic Prime Minister is so far not on the cards.
Anybody who lives in a Democratic country and who has not disgraced themselves should be allowed to be the chief.
[edit on 20-7-2009 by smurfy]
You know I keep reading these threads and it just amazes me how many people miss the point.
It's not about where he was born nearly as much as it is about the fact he would cover up the fact he is not eligible (intentionally break the law), and in the process cause a constitutional crisis apparently all for his desire for power.
If the president does not uphold the law and gets away with it, than it only demonstrates he is above the law. What happens when laws are no longer followed? This is how dictatorships start.
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
If the Judaical Branch follows it, then they are just as guilty.
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
If the Judaical Branch follows it, then they are just as guilty.
Hey, come on, leave the Jews out of this!
Originally posted by A Bunch of Nervous Conservatives
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah...
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
If the Judaical Branch follows it, then they are just as guilty.
Hey, come on, leave the Jews out of this!
Originally posted by mikerussellus
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
If the Judaical Branch follows it, then they are just as guilty.
Hey, come on, leave the Jews out of this!
Not nice. Racist. But you're a liberal, so that makes it ok. Want to pick on another ethnic group next?
How about people who cling to their guns and bibles?
-snort-
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by A Bunch of Nervous Conservatives
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah...
You guys are all laboring under the delusion that this is a question of liberal versus conservative. It's not. It's a question of rational, moral, mainstream, middle-of-the-road American people versus the blind nationalism that has cost us so much.
Originally posted by flightsuit
Intelligence and what you call "liberalism" happen to go hand-in-hand.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
If the Judaical Branch follows it, then they are just as guilty.
Hey, come on, leave the Jews out of this!
Not nice. Racist. But you're a liberal, so that makes it ok. Want to pick on another ethnic group next?
How about people who cling to their guns and bibles?
-snort-
Originally posted by mikerussellus
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by A Bunch of Nervous Conservatives
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah...
You guys are all laboring under the delusion that this is a question of liberal versus conservative. It's not. It's a question of rational, moral, mainstream, middle-of-the-road American people versus the blind nationalism that has cost us so much.
Arrogant AND racist. Are you sure you're not a member of the Obama administration?