It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PAYBACKCOMESSOON/
Timothy McVeigh didn't only stand for the innocent women and children who were killed evily in Waco, Texas or the poor girl the sniper killed in Ruby Ridge, he stood for the average American.
Unfortunately, children died in the bombing of Oklahoma City, but just as unfortunately, children died when monsters killed women and children in Waco, Texas.
One man, and only one man vindicated their deaths. One man and only one man stood up and said "blood for blood in honor of fellow Americans".
There should be a statue in his honor erected. I stand firm on this post!
Originally posted by blueorder
reply to post by gimme_some_truth
maybe not, but consider that the US govt, supported by many people in the US (if we look at who got votes and none of them were "anti war"), goes to war in Iraq, knowing full well that this will result in dead babies and children- we moralise but when we look a little closer it aint so prettyedit on 7-2-2012 by blueorder because: (no reason given)edit on 7-2-2012 by blueorder because: (no reason given)
Sovereign citizens are people who reject their U.S. citizenship and don't recognize government authority, like laws and taxes. In 2009, the FBI started paying closer attention to the movement, which previously had been grouped with the militia movements in the bureau's domestic counterterrorism operations. Many people who claim to be followers of this movement are involved in white collar crimes like tax evasion schemes and making fraudulent documents, the FBI said.
Originally posted by Aeons
I don't disagree with you gimmie.
What exactly is your solution to a government out of control, and where changes in governance don't effect any change in a fundamental problem?
The founders of your contry seemed to make what they thought was an effective control for that clear. It would seem to me that all areas of government should be aware that they cannot disassociate themselves from a fundamental meme of the country.
Originally posted by Aeons
How do you meet violence of governance - large scale, or tribal? How do you make societies backwards compatible?
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
My only question is why did someone resurrect a 4 year old thread that had not been commented on since 09
LoL just curious as to why someone would pull it back up again after it died
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
My only question is why did someone resurrect a 4 year old thread that had not been commented on since 09
LoL just curious as to why someone would pull it back up again after it died
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
My only question is why did someone resurrect a 4 year old thread that had not been commented on since 09
LoL just curious as to why someone would pull it back up again after it died
I did that. We got a pod of McVeigh-worshippers in here for a month or two. Real sick people. And so I got curious about previous McVeigh threads and found a few. Got reading them. Commented. That kind of thing ..
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by earthdude
Wishful thinking.
That's what this is. People would rather believe that the government or some super power controls everything, than to consider that individuals are capable of amazing feats and terrible horrors.