It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by exponent
What I am trying to show here tezza is that it is not going to be possible for me to prove this to you, because you can rationalise it away using the claim that it is faith based.
Originally posted by exponent
Take this thread for example, you have been pressing me constantly for equations to determine the penetration into dirt, wheras I have been unable to get you to even illustrate the barest essentials of any alternative theory.
We don't really know that they didn't, the pictures we have were released as trial exhibits, they were likely a selection from a larger set. It wouldn't hurt to file a FOIA to find out if there are actually more.
Originally posted by exponent
I'm afraid not. I have little information to go off
I don't see how my opinion of how much was buried affects the scene.
I believe it was quoted as 40 feet, but I can look this up if there's any actual importance attached to it.
So you don't actually know the dimensions at all. You're just guessing,
and somehow thinking that guesses are more worthwhile than DNA evidence.
I don't think so, and this attitude is horrifying to me.
AHA! So the fact there was someone in the hole is proof they were staged? Oh wait no again it's just more worthless speculation from someone who has an irreducible delusion.
It isn't much remains, but luckily using modern forensic techniques he can use these small remains to identify the body they are from. This was done, and obviously you can't think of any way to counter this so you just ignore it.
I doubt you would accept it if a volunteer with provable credentials explained it to you. You want to believe that it's faked, and therefore you do believe it is faked, there is no logic you are using, just your own personal bias.
Note I didn't say most, because I cannot quantify the amount.
I believe a large amount of it was buried because there's nothing impossible about this
and there were many people involved in the recovery of bits of Flight 93 from under the ground!
Unless some actual evidence gets presented
posted by benoni
Quite frankly, I m still looking for evidence of a plane that crashed there at all, let alone how much/what percentage was buried!!
No wreckage at the site , but small pieces of debris scattered about for 5 miles??Come on..
Sounds like a missile strike, based on the evidence thus far.....and certainly no plane divebombed into the ground vertically....that i am sure of....based on the evidence.
posted by benoni
look swamp...
perhaps you havent been reading my comments...
let me spell it out to you again..
The plane was not, and could not have been intact when it "hit the floor"..
Why??
Because of the trail of debris spread over 5 miles....OK???and because there where no plane parts found at the alledged crash site...same as no bodies, no wings, no fuselage, no engines, no seats, no NOTHING!!
This is why Donald Rumsfeld and i concur that the plane was shot down by a missile..OK??Clear enough??
Good....
posted by pinch
The clearance listed on your screen shot for Sword 31 is as follows:
ADW AML J149 EMPTY J80 LMN SHACK OFF
which translated to the uninformed, is depart Andrews AFB (ADW), proceed to the fix known as ARMEL (AML), which is a vortac near Dulles, join jet route 149 (J149) fly on that route until you hit the fix named EMPTY (an intersection near Columbus, OH) join jet route 80 (J80) until you hit the waypoint TILMN in southern Indiana, then direct to SHACK, which is a fix on the Offutt, AFB (their destination) HI-ILS RWY 30 approach, then land at Offutt (OFF).
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by ATH911
But you continue to have faith that most of Flight laid buried under that shallow crater.
Originally posted by exponent
As usual tezza your post is filled with accusation and insinuation. You have failed to propose any reasonable theory, and rely on nothing more than speculation while ignoring the amount of evidence that is available.
Originally posted by exponent
I have explained to you in depth as to why I will never be able to prove this to you, and you have unknowingly confirmed this with your repetition.
Originally posted by exponent
Until you are able to present evidence which actually favours an alternate theory (which you'll also have to figure out) then what is the point in debating any further? The evidence has been presented, it clearly favours a plane impact, and there is nothing more I can add.
posted by GenRadek
reply to post by SPreston
For the last time, the "second debris field" CONSISTED OF: LIGHT MATERIALS, (ie: PAPER, NYLONS, CLOTHS, MAGAZINES, INSULATION, SMALL SHARDS OF THE SKIN, HUMAN REMAINS)